Molecular details of the activation of the μ opioid receptor

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 117, Issue 26, 2013, Pages 7907-7917

  Shim, Jihyun ^a   Coop, Andrew ^a   Mackerell, Alexander D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF PHARMACY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

BASIC NITROGEN; BUPRENORPHINE; CONSTITUTIVELY ACTIVES; DIRECT INTERACTIONS; DYNAMICS SIMULATION; HIGH PROBABILITY; MEDIUM SIZE; OPIOID RECEPTORS; RECEPTOR ACTIVATION; STERIC INTERACTIONS;

CHEMICAL ACTIVATION;

EID: 84879740874     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: 15205207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp404238n     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Martin, T. J.; Eisenach, J. C. Pharmacology of Opioid and Nonopioid Analgesics in Chronic Pain States J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2001, 299, 811-7
2. Stevens, R. C.; Cherezov, V.; Katritch, V.; Abagyan, R.; Kuhn, P.; Rosen, H.; Wuthrich, K. The Gpcr Network: A Large-Scale Collaboration to Determine Human Gpcr Structure and Function Nat. Rev. Drug. Discovery 2012, 12, 25-34
3. Casy, A. F.; Parfitt, R. T. Opioid Analgesics: Chemistry and Receptors; Plenum Press: New York, 1986.
4. Coop, A.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr. The Future of Opioid Analgesics Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2002, 66, 153-156
5. Urban, J. D.; Clarke, W. P.; von Zastrow, M.; Nichols, D. E.; Kobilka, B.; Weinstein, H.; Javitch, J. A.; Roth, B. L.; Christopoulos, A.; Sexton, P. M. Functional Selectivity and Classical Concepts of Quantitative Pharmacology J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2007, 320, 1-13
6. Portoghese, P. S.; Sultana, M.; Nagase, H.; Takemori, A. E. Application of the Message-Address Concept in the Design of Highly Potent and Selective Non-Peptide Delta Opioid Receptor Antagonists J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 281-2
7. Bernard, D.; Coop, A.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr. Quantitative Conformationally Sampled Pharmacophore for Δ Opioid Ligands: Reevaluation of Hydrophobic Moieties Essential for Biological Activity J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 1799-1809
8. Shim, J.; Coop, A.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr. Consensus 3d Model of Mu-Opioid Receptor Ligand Efficacy Based on a Quantitative Conformationally Sampled Pharmacophore J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 7487-7496
9. Granier, S.; Manglik, A.; Kruse, A. C.; Kobilka, T. S.; Thian, F. S.; Weis, W. I.; Kobilka, B. K. Structure of the Delta-Opioid Receptor Bound to Naltrindole Nature 2012, 485, 400-404
10. Manglik, A.; Kruse, A. C.; Kobilka, T. S.; Thian, F. S.; Mathiesen, J. M.; Sunahara, R. K.; Pardo, L.; Weis, W. I.; Kobilka, B. K.; Granier, S. Crystal Structure of the Mu-Opioid Receptor Bound to a Morphinan Antagonist Nature 2012, 485, 321-326
11. Thompson, A. A.; Liu, W.; Chun, E.; Katritch, V.; Wu, H.; Vardy, E.; Huang, X. P.; Trapella, C.; Guerrini, R.; Calo, G. Structure of the Nociceptin/Orphanin Fq Receptor in Complex with a Peptide Mimetic Nature 2012, 485, 395-9
12. Wu, H.; Wacker, D.; Mileni, M.; Katritch, V.; Han, G. W.; Vardy, E.; Liu, W.; Thompson, A. A.; Huang, X. P.; Carroll, F. I. Structure of the Human Kappa-Opioid Receptor in Complex with Jdtic Nature 2012, 485, 327-32
13. Filizola, M.; Devi, L. A. Grand Opening of Structure-Guided Design for Novel Opioids Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2012, 34, 6-12
14. Nygaard, R.; Zou, Y.; Dror, R. O.; Mildorf, T. J.; Arlow, D. H.; Manglik, A.; Pan, A. C.; Liu, C. W.; Fung, J. J.; Bokoch, M. P. The Dynamic Process of Beta(2)-Adrenergic Receptor Activation Cell 2013, 152, 532-42
15. Portoghese, P. S. From Models to Molecules: Opioid Receptor Dimers, Bivalent Ligands, and Selective Opioid Receptor Probes J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 2259-2269
16. Huang, P.; Li, J.; Chen, C.; Visiers, I.; Weinstein, H.; Liu-Chen, L. Y. Functional Role of a Conserved Motif in Tm6 of the Rat Mu Opioid Receptor: Constitutively Active and Inactive Receptors Result from Substitutions of Thr6.34(279) with Lys and Asp Biochemistry 2001, 40, 13501-9
17. Eswar, N.; Webb, B.; Marti-Renom, M. A.; Madhusudhan, M. S.; Eramian, D.; Shen, M.-Y.; Pieper, U.; Sali, A. Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using Modeller. In Current Protocols in Protein Science; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2006; Chapter 5.
18. Fiser, A.; Do, R. K.; Sali, A. Modeling of Loops in Protein Structures Protein Sci. 2000, 9, 1753-73
19. Buchan, D. W.; Ward, S. M.; Lobley, A. E.; Nugent, T. C.; Bryson, K.; Jones, D. T. Protein Annotation and Modelling Servers at University College London Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, W563-8
20. Cole, C.; Barber, J. D.; Barton, G. J. The Jpred 3 Secondary Structure Prediction Server Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, W197-201
21. Jo, S.; Kim, T.; Iyer, V. G.; Im, W. Charmm-Gui: A Web-Based Graphical User Interface for Charmm J. Comput. Chem. 2008, 29, 1859-1865
22. Jorgensen, W. L.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J. D.; Impey, R. W.; Klein, M. L. Comparison of Simple Potential Functions for Simulating Liquid Water J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 926-926
23. Brooks, B. R.; Brooks, C. L.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr.; Nilsson, L.; Petrella, R. J.; Roux, B.; Won, Y.; Archontis, G.; Bartels, C.; Boresch, S. Charmm: The Biomolecular Simulation Program J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 1545-1614
24. Feller, S. E.; Zhang, Y.; Pastor, R. W.; Brooks, B. R. Constant Pressure Molecular Dynamics Simulation: The Langevin Piston Method J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 4613-4613
25. Phillips, J. C.; Braun, R.; Wang, W.; Gumbart, J.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Villa, E.; Chipot, C.; Skeel, R. D.; Kalé, L.; Schulten, K. Scalable Molecular Dynamics with Namd J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1781-1802
26. Allen, M. P.; Tildesley, D. J. Computer Simulation of Liquids; Oxford University Press, New York, 1989; Vol. 1.
27. Chandrasekhar, S. Stochastic Problems in Physics and Astronomy Rev. Mod. Phys. 1943, 15, 1-89
28. Ryckaert, J. P.; Ciccotti, G.; Berendsen, H. J. C. Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of N-Alkanes J. Comput. Phys. 1977, 23, 327-341
29. Steinbach, P. J.; Brooks, B. R. New Spherical-Cutoff Methods for Long-Range Forces in Macromolecular Simulation J. Comput. Chem. 1994, 15, 667-683
30. Darden, T.; York, D.; Pedersen, L. Particle Mesh Ewald: An N·Log(N) Method for Ewald Sums in Large Systems J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 10089-10092
31. Klauda, J. B.; Venable, R. M.; Freites, J. A.; O'Connor, J. W.; Tobias, D. J.; Mondragon-Ramirez, C.; Vorobyov, I.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr. Update of the Charmm All-Atom Additive Force Field for Lipids: Validation on Six Lipid Types J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 7830-7843
32. Best, R. B.; Zhu, X.; Shim, J.; Lopes, P.; Mittal, J.; Feig, M.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr. Optimization of the Additive Charmm All-Atom Protein Force Field Targeting Improved Sampling of the Backbone Phi, Psi and Side-Chain Chi1 and Chi2 Dihedral Angles J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 3257-3273
33. Kuzmanic, A.; Zagrovic, B. Determination of Ensemble-Average Pairwise Root Mean-Square Deviation from Experimental B-Factors Biophys. J. 2010, 98, 861-871
34. Phillips, G. N., Jr. Comparison of the Dynamics of Myoglobin in Different Crystal Forms Biophys. J. 1990, 57, 381-3
35. Harding, W. W.; Tidgewell, K.; Byrd, N.; Cobb, H.; Dersch, C. M.; Butelman, E. R.; Rothman, R. B.; Prisinzano, T. E. Neoclerodane Diterpenes as a Novel Scaffold for Mu Opioid Receptor Ligands J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4765-4771
36. Li, J. G.; Chen, C.; Yin, J.; Rice, K.; Zhang, Y.; Matecka, D.; de Riel, J. K.; DesJarlais, R. L.; Liu-Chen, L. Y. Asp147 in the Third Transmembrane Helix of the Rat Mu Opioid Receptor Forms Ion-Pairing with Morphine and Naltrexone Life Sci. 1999, 65, 175-85
37. Surratt, C. K.; Johnson, P. S.; Moriwaki, A.; Seidleck, B. K.; Blaschak, C. J.; Wang, J. B.; Uhl, G. R. -Mu Opiate Receptor. Charged Transmembrane Domain Amino Acids Are Critical for Agonist Recognition and Intrinsic Activity J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 20548-53
38. Befort, K.; Tabbara, L.; Bausch, S.; Chavkin, C.; Evans, C.; Kieffer, B. The Conserved Aspartate Residue in the Third Putative Transmembrane Domain of the Delta-Opioid Receptor Is Not the Anionic Counterpart for Cationic Opiate Binding but Is a Constituent of the Receptor Binding Site Mol. Pharmacol. 1996, 49, 216-23
39. Mansour, A.; Taylor, L. P.; Fine, J. L.; Thompson, R. C.; Hoversten, M. T.; Mosberg, H. I.; Watson, S. J.; Akil, H. Key Residues Defining the Mu-Opioid Receptor Binding Pocket: A Site-Directed Mutagenesis Study J. Neurochem. 1997, 68, 344-53
40. Lewis, J. W.; Husbands, S. M. The Orvinols and Related Opioids - High Affinity Ligands with Diverse Efficacy Profiles Curr. Pharm. Des. 2004, 10, 717-32
41. Standfuss, J.; Edwards, P. C.; D'Antona, A.; Fransen, M.; Xie, G.; Oprian, D. D.; Schertler, G. F. The Structural Basis of Agonist-Induced Activation in Constitutively Active Rhodopsin Nature 2011, 471, 656-60
42. Rasmussen, S. G.; DeVree, B. T.; Zou, Y.; Kruse, A. C.; Chung, K. Y.; Kobilka, T. S.; Thian, F. S.; Chae, P. S.; Pardon, E.; Calinski, D. Crystal Structure of the Beta2 Adrenergic Receptor-Gs Protein Complex Nature 2011, 477, 549-55
43. Rozenfeld, R.; Gomes, I.; Devi, L. A. Opioid Receptor Dimerization. In The Opiate Receptors; Pasternak, G. W., Ed.; Springer Science: New York, 2011; pp 407-437.
44. Bai, M. Dimerization of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors: Roles in Signal Transduction Cell Signalling 2004, 16, 175-86
45. Åqvist, J. A Simple Way to Calculate the Axis of an A-Helix Comput. Chem. 1986, 10, 97-99
46. Chothia, C.; Levitt, M.; Richardson, D. Helix to Helix Packing in Proteins J. Mol. Biol. 1981, 145, 215-50