Temporal whitening by power-law adaptation in neocortical neurons

Nature Neuroscience

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 942-948

  Pozzorini, Christian ^a   Naud, Richard ^a   Mensi, Skander ^a   Gerstner, Wulfram ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADAPTATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN CELL; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; BRAIN SLICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; IN VITRO STUDY; INTRACELLULAR MEMBRANE; INTRACELLULAR RECORDING; MEMBRANE FILTER; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; MOUSE; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; POWER LAW ADAPTATION; POWER SPECTRUM; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYRAMIDAL NERVE CELL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPECTROMETRY; SPIKE WAVE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VIBRISSA;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; BIOPHYSICS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STRUCTURAL; NEOCORTEX; PATCH-CLAMP TECHNIQUES; PYRAMIDAL CELLS; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO;

EID: 84879686980     PISSN: 10976256     EISSN: 15461726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nn.3431     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Attwell, D. & Laughlin, S.B. An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 21, 1133-1145 (2001).
2. Laughlin, S.B. Energy as a constraint on the coding and processing of sensory information. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 475-480 (2001).
3. Barlow, H. Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. in Sensory Communication (ed. Rosenblith, W.A.) 217-234 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1961).
4. Srinivasan, M.V., Laughlin, S.B. & Dubs, A. Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 216, 427-459 (1982).
5. Dong, D. & Atick, J. Temporal decorrelation: a theory of lagged and nonlagged responses in the lateral geniculate nucleus. Network 6, 159-178 (1995).
6. Dan, Y., Atick, J. & Reid, R.C. Efficient coding of natural scenes in the lateral geniculate nucleus: experimental test of a computational theory. J. Neurosci. 16, 3351-3362 (1996).
7. Pitkow, X. & Meister, M. Decorrelation and efficient coding by retinal ganglion cells. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 628-635 (2012).
8. Wark, B., Lundstrom, B.N. & Fairhall, A.L. Sensory adaptation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 17, 423-429 (2007).
9. Wainwright, M.J. Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission. Vision Res. 39, 3960-3974 (1999).
10. Brenner, N., Bialek, W. & de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission. Neuron 26, 695-702 (2000).
11. Fairhall, A.L., Lewen, G.D., Bialek, W. & de Ruyter Van Steveninck, R.R. Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code. Nature 412, 787-792 (2001).
12. Maravall, M., Petersen, R.S., Fairhall, A.L., Arabzadeh, E. & Diamond, M.E. Shifts in coding properties and maintenance of information transmission during adaptation in barrel cortex. PLoS Biol. 5, e19 (2007).
13. Baccus, S.A. & Meister, M. Fast and slow contrast adaptation in retinal circuitry. Neuron 36, 909-919 (2002).
14. Ulanovsky, N., Las, L., Farkas, D. & Nelken, I. Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons. J. Neurosci. 24, 10440-10453 (2004).
15. Simoncelli, E.P. & Olshausen, B. Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 1193-1216 (2001).
16. Izhikevich, E.M. Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 14, 1569-1572 (2003).
17. Brette, R. & Gerstner, W. Adaptive exponential integrate-and-fire model as an effective description of neuronal activity. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 3637-3642 (2005).
18. Spain, W.J. & Schwindt, P. Two transient potassium currents in layer V pyramidal neurones from cat sensorimotor cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 434, 591-607 (1991).
19. Gilboa, G., Chen, R. & Brenner, N. History-dependent multiple-timescale dynamics in a single-neuron model. J. Neurosci. 25, 6479-6489 (2005).
20. La Camera, G. et al. Multiple time scales of temporal response in pyramidal and fast spiking cortical neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 96, 3448-3464 (2006).
21. Lundstrom, B.N., Higgs, M.H., Spain, W.J. & Fairhall, A.L. Fractional differentiation by neocortical pyramidal neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1335-1342 (2008).
22. Drew, P.J. & Abbott, L.F. Models and properties of power-law adaptation in neural systems. J. Neurophysiol. 96, 826-833 (2006).
23. Fleidervish, I.A., Friedman, A. & Gutnick, M.J. Slow inactivation of Na+ current and slow cumulative spike adaptation in mouse and guinea-pig neocortical neurones in slices. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 493, 83-97 (1996).
24. Mickus, T., Jung, H.y. & Spruston, N. Properties of slow, cumulative sodium channel inactivation in rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Biophys. J. 76, 846-860 (1999).
25. Melnick, I.V., Santos, S.F.A. & Safronov, B.V. Mechanism of spike frequency adaptation in substantia gelatinosa neurones of rat. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 559, 383-395 (2004).
26. Madison, D.V. & Nicoll, R.A. Control of the repetitive discharge of rat CA 1 pyramidal neurones in vitro. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 354, 319-331 (1984).
27. Schwindt, P.C., Spain, W.J. & Crill, W.E. Long-lasting reduction of excitability by a sodium-dependent potassium current in cat neocortical neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 61, 233-244 (1989).
28. Sanchez-Vives, M.V., Nowak, L.G. & McCormick, D.A. Cellular mechanisms of long-lasting adaptation in visual cortical neurons in vitro. J. Neurosci. 20, 4286-4299 (2000).
29. Wang, X.J., Liu, Y., Sanchez-Vives, M.V. & McCormick, D.A. Adaptation and temporal decorrelation by single neurons in the primary visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 89, 3279-3293 (2003).
30. Rieke, F., Warland, D., de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. & Bialek, W. Spikes: Exploring the neural code (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999).
31. Crochet, S., Poulet, J.F.A., Kremer, Y. & Petersen, C.C.H. Synaptic mechanisms underlying sparse coding of active touch. Neuron 69, 1160-1175 (2011).
32. Gerstner, W. & Kistler, W. Spiking Neuron Models: Single Neurons, Populations, Plasticity (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2002).
33. Mensi, S. et al. Parameter extraction and classification of three cortical neuron types reveals two distinct adaptation mechanisms. J. Neurophysiol. 107, 1756-1775 (2012).
34. Jolivet, R. et al. The quantitative single-neuron modeling competition. Biol. Cybern. 99, 417-426 (2008).
35. Naud, R., Gerhard, F., Mensi, S. & Gerstner, W. Improved similarity measures for small sets of spike trains. Neural Comput. 23, 3016-3069 (2011).
36. Atick, J. Could information theory provide an ecological theory of sensory processing? Network 22, 4-44 (2011).
37. Benda, J. & Herz, A.V.M. A universal model for spike-frequency adaptation. Neural Comput. 15, 2523-2564 (2003).
38. Köndgen, H. et al. The dynamical response of neocortical neurons to temporally modulated noisy inputs in vitro. Cereb. Cortex 18, 2086-2097 (2008).
39. Toib, A., Lyakhov, V. & Marom, S. Interaction between duration of activity and time course of recovery from slow inactivation in mammalian brain Na+ channels. J. Neurosci. 18, 1893-1903 (1998).
40. Lowen, S.B., Liebovitch, L.S. & White, J.A. Fractal ion-channel behavior generates fractal firing patterns in neuronal models. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Topics 59, 5970-5980 (1999).
41. Bohte, S.M. & Rombouts, J.O. Fractionally predictive spiking neurons. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 23, 253-261 (2010).
42. Mar, D.J., Chow, C.C., Gerstner, W., Adams, R.W. & Collins, J.J. Noise shaping in populations of coupled model neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 10450-10455 (1999).
43. Shin, J. Adaptation in spiking neurons based on the noise shaping neural coding hypothesis. Neural Netw. 14, 907-919 (2001).
44. Chacron, M.J., Lindner, B. & Longtin, A. Noise shaping by interval correlations increases information transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 080601 (2004).
45. Avila-Akerberg, O. & Chacron, M.J. Nonrenewal spike train statistics: causes and functional consequences on neural coding. Exp. Brain Res. 210, 353-371 (2011).
46. Lefort, S., Tomm, C., Sarria, J.C.F. & Petersen, C.C.H. The excitatory neuronal network of the C2 barrel column in mouse primary somatosensory cortex. Neuron 61, 301-316 (2009).
47. Avermann, M., Tomm, C., Mateo, C., Gerstner, W. & Petersen, C.C.H. Microcircuits of excitatory and inhibitory neurons in layer 2/3 of mouse barrel cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 107, 3116-3134 (2012).
48. Jolivet, R., Rauch, A., Lüscher, H. & Gerstner, W. Predicting spike timing of neocortical pyramidal neurons by simple threshold models. J. Comput. Neurosci. 21, 35-49 (2006).
49. Truccolo, W., Eden, U.T., Fellows, M.R., Donoghue, J.P. & Brown, E.N. A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble and extrinsic covariate effects. J. Neurophysiol. 93, 1074-1089 (2005).
50. Pillow, J.W. et al. Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signaling in a complete neuronal population. Nature 454, 995-999 (2008).
51. Brette, R. et al. High-resolution intracellular recordings using a real-time computational model of the electrode. Neuron 59, 379-391 (2008).
52. Badel, L. et al. Dynamic I-V curves are reliable predictors of naturalistic pyramidal-neuron voltage traces. J. Neurophysiol. 99, 656-666 (2008).
53. Paninski, L., Pillow, J. & Simoncelli, E. Comparing integrate-and-fire models estimated using intracellular and extracellular data. Neurocomputing 65, 379-385 (2005).
54. Brillinger, D.R. Maximum likelihood analysis of spike trains of interacting nerve cells. Biol. Cybern. 59, 189-200 (1988).
55. Paninski, L. Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models. Network 15, 243-262 (2004).