Mathematics anxiety and stereotype threat: Shared mechanisms, negative consequences and promising interventions

Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 115-128

  Maloney, Erin A ^a   Schaeffer, Marjorie W ^a   Beilock, Sian L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

mathematics achievement; mathematics anxiety; stereotype threat

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879673269     PISSN: 14794802     EISSN: 17540178     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14794802.2013.797744     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ashcraft, M. 2002. Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 115: 181 - 5. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00196
2. Ashcraft, M. and Kirk, E. 2001. The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1302: 224 - 37. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.224
3. Ashcraft, M. and Moore, A. 2009. Mathematics anxiety and the affective drop in performance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 273: 197 - 205. doi: 10.1177/0734282908330580
4. Ashcraft, M. and Ridley, K. 2005. " Math anxiety and its cognitive consequences: A tutorial review ". In Handbook of mathematical cognition, Edited by: Campbell, J. 315 - 27. New York: Psychology Press.
5. Baddeley, A. 2000. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 411: 417 - 23. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
6. Beilock, S.L. 2010. Choke: What the secrets of the brain reveal about getting it right when you have to, Simon and Schuster: Free Press.
7. Beilock, S.L., Gunderson, E.A., Ramirez, G. and Levine, S.C. 2010. Female teachers' math anxiety affects girls' math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 1075: 1060 - 3.
8. Beilock, S.L., Rydell, R.J. and McConnell, A.R. 2007. Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviation, and spill over. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136: 256 - 76. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.256
9. Candinu, M., Maass, A., Frigerio, S., Impagliazzo, L. and Latinotti, S. 2003. Stereotype threat: The effect of expectancy on performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 332: 267 - 85. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.145
10. Croizet, J., Despres, G., Gauzins, M., Huguet, P., Leyens, J. and Meot, A. 2004. Stereotype threat undermines intellectual performance by triggering a disruptive mental load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 306: 721 - 31. doi: 10.1177/0146167204263961
11. Danaher, K. and Crandall, C. 2008. Stereotype threat in applied settings re-examined. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 386: 1639 - 55. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00362.x
12. Devine, A., Fawcett, K., Szu{double acute accent}cs, D. and Dowker, A. 2012. Gender differences in mathematics anxiety and the relation to mathematics performance while controlling for test anxiety. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8: 33 doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-8-33
13. DeCaro, M.S., Rotar, K.E., Kendra, M.S. and Beilock, S.L. 2010. Diagnosing and alleviating the impact of performance pressure on mathematical problem solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 638: 1619 - 30. doi: 10.1080/17470210903474286
14. De Rammelaere, S., Stuyven, E. and Vandierendonck, A. 1999. The contribution of working memory resources in the verification of simple mental arithmetic sums. Psychological Research, 62: 72 - 7. doi: 10.1007/s004260050041
15. Engle, R. 2002. Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 111: 19 - 23. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00160
16. Faust, M.W. 1992. Analysis of physiological reactivity in mathematics anxiety. PhD diss., Bowling Green State University, Ohio.
17. Gough, M.F. 1954. Mathemaphobia: Causes and treatments. Clearing House, 28: 290 - 294.
18. Hembree, R. 1990. The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 211: 33 - 46. doi: 10.2307/749455
19. Imbo, I. and LeFevre, J. 2010. The role of phonological and visuo-spatial working memory in complex arithmetic problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 38: 176 - 85. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.2.176
20. Jamieson, J., Mendes, W.B., Blackstock, E. and Schmader, T. 2010. Turning the knots in your stomach into bows: Reappraising arousal improves performance on the GRE. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46: 208 - 12. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.015
21. Johns, M., Schmader, T. and Martens, A. 2005. Knowing is half the battle: Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women's math performance. Psychological Science, 163: 175 - 9. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00799.x
22. Krinzinger, H., Kaufmann, L. and Willmes, K. 2010. Math anxiety and math ability in early primary school years. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27: 206 - 25. doi: 10.1177/0734282908330583
23. Leyens, J., Desert, M., Croizet, J. and Darcis, C. 2000. Stereotype threat: Are lower status and history of stigmatization preconditions of stereotype threat?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2610: 1189 - 99. doi: 10.1177/0146167200262002
24. Lyons, I.M. and Beilock, S.L. 2012. Mathematics anxiety: Separating the math from the anxiety. Cerebral Cortex, 22: 2102 - 2110. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr289
25. Maloney, E.A. and Beilock, S.L. 2012. Math anxiety: Who has it, why it develops, and how to guard against it. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16: 404 - 6. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.008
26. Maloney, E.A., Ansari, D. and Fugelsang, J.A. 2011. The effect of mathematics anxiety on the processing of numerical magnitude. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 641: 10 - 16. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.533278
27. Maloney, E.A., Risko, E.F., Ansari, D. and Fugelsang, J.A. 2010. Mathematics anxiety affects counting but not subitizing during visual enumeration. Cognition, 1142: 293 - 7. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.013
28. Maloney, E.A., Waechter, S., Risko, E.F. and Fugelsang, J.A. 2012. Reducing the sex difference in math anxiety: The role of spatial processing ability. Learning and Individual Differences, 22: 380 - 4. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.01.001
29. Marx, D., Stapel, D. and Muller, D. 2005. We can do it: The interplay of construal orientation and social comparisons under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 883: 432 - 46. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.432
30. Mattarella-Micke, A., Mateo, J., Kozak, M.N., Foster, K. and Beilock, S.L. 2011. Choke or thrive? The relation between salivary cortisol and math performance depends on individual differences in working memory and math anxiety. Emotion, 114: 1000 - 5. doi: 10.1037/a0023224
31. Miyake, A. and Shah, P. 1999. Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control, New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Nosek, B. A., F.L. Smyth, N. Sriram, N.M. Lindner, T. Devos, A. Ayala, Y. Bar-Anan, R. Bergh, H. Cai, K. Gonsalkorale, S. Kesebir, N. Maliszewski, F. Neto, E. Olli, J. Park, K. Schnabel, K. Shiomura, B. Tulbure, R.W. Wiers, M. Somogyi, N. Akrami, B. Ekehammar, M. Vianello, M.R. Banaji, and A.G. Greenwald. 2009. National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA: 593 - 597.
33. Park, D., G. Ramirez, and S.L. Beilock. 2011. Put your math burden down: Expressive writing for the highly math anxious. Paper presented at the Midwestern Psychology Association, Chicago, IL.
34. Pinel, E. 1999. Stigma consciousness: The psychological legacy of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 761: 114 - 28. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.114
35. Polyhart, R., Ziegert, J. and McFarland, L. 2003. Understanding racial differences on cognitive ability tests in selection contexts: An integration of stereotype threat and applicant reactions research. Human Performance, 163: 231 - 59. doi: 10.1207/S15327043HUP1603_4
36. Ramirez, G. and Beilock, S.L. 2011. Writing about testing worries boosts exam performance in the classroom. Science, 331: 211 - 3. doi: 10.1126/science.1199427
37. Richardson, F. and Siunn, R. 1972. The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 196: 551 - 4. doi: 10.1037/h0033456
38. Schmader, T. 2002. Gender identification moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38: 194 - 201. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2001.1500
39. Schmader, T. and Johns, M. 2003. Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 854: 440 - 52. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.440
40. Seyler, D., Kirk, E. and Ashcraft, M. 2003. Elementary subtraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 296: 1339 - 52.
41. Spencer, S., Steele, C. and Quinn, D. 1999. Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 351: 4 - 28. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1998.1373
42. Steele, C. and Aronson, J. 1995. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 695: 369 - 89.
43. Stricker, L. and Ward, W. 2004. Stereotype threat, inquiring about test takers' ethnicity and gender, and standardized test performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 344: 665 - 93. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02564.x
44. Tooke, D.J. and Lindstrom, L.C. 1998. Effectiveness of a mathematics methods course in reducing math anxiety of preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 983: 136 - 9. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17406.x
45. Turner, J.C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D.K., Ghenn, M., Anderman, E.M. and Kang, Y. 2002. The classroom environment and students' reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multi method study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94: 88 - 106. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.88