The conflict of harmony: Intergroup contact, commonality and political solidarity between minority groups

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 323-328

  Glasford, Demis E ^a,b   Calcagno, Justine ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Common identity; Dual identity; Intergroup contact; Minority groups; Political solidarity

Indexed keywords

EID: 82655184152     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, US.
2. Allport G.W. The nature of prejudice 1954, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA.
3. Brown R., Maras P., Masser B., Vivian J., Hewstone M. Life on the ocean wave: Testing some intergroup hypotheses in a naturalistic setting. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 2001, 4:81-97.
4. Crisp R.J., Stone C.H., Hall N.R. Recategorization and subgroup identification: Predicting and preventing threats from common ingroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006, 32:230-243.
5. Dixon J., Durrheim K., Tredoux C., Tropp L., Clack B., Eaton L. A paradox of integration? Interracial contact, prejudice reduction, and perceptions of racial discrimination. Journal of Social Issues 2010, 66:401-416.
6. Dixon J.A., Tropp L.R., Durrheim K., Tredoux C. 'Let them eat harmony': Prejudice-reduction strategies and attitudes of historically disadvantaged groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2010, 19:76-80.
7. Esses V.M., Dovidio J.F., Jackson L.M., Armstrong T.L. The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues 2001, 57:389-412.
8. Esses V.M., Wagner U., Wolf C., Preiser M., Wilbur C.J. Perceptions of national identity and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration in Canada and Germany. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 2006, 30:653-669.
9. Gaertner S.L., Dovidio J.F. Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model 2000, Psychology Press, Philadelphia.
10. Gaertner S.L., Dovidio J.F., Anastasio P.A., Bachman B.A., Rust M.C. The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of social psychology 1993, 4:1-26. John Wiley, New York.
11. Gaertner S.L., Rust M.C., Dovidio J.F., Bachman B.A., Anastasio P.A. Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 57:239-249.
12. Gaertner S.L., Rust M.C., Dovidio J.F., Bachman B.A., Anastasio P.A. The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias among majority and minority group members. What's social about social cognition? 1996, 230-260. Sage, Newbury Park, CA. J.L. Nye, A.M. Brower (Eds.).
13. Hornsey M.J., Hogg M.A. Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2000, 26:242-256.
14. Kenny D.A., Kashy D.A., Bolger N. Data analysis in social psychology. The handbook of social psychology 1998, 1:233-265. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA. 4th Ed. D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, G. Lindzey (Eds.).
15. King M.L. Letter from Birmingham city jail 1963, Fellowship Reconciliation, Nyack, NY.
16. Pettigrew T.F., Tropp L.R. A meta-analytical test of the intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 90:751-783.
17. Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2004, 36(4):717-731.
18. Saguy T., Dovidio J.F., Pratto F. Beyond contact: Intergroup contact in the context of power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2008, 43:432-445.
19. Saguy T., Tausch N., Dovidio J.F., Pratto F. The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science 2009, 20(1):114-121.
20. Schubert T.W., Otten S. Overlap of self, ingroup, and outgroup: Pictorial measures of self-categorization. Self and Identity 2002, 1:353-376.
21. Simon B., Klandermans B. Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist 2001, 56:319-331.
22. Subasic E., Reynolds K.J., Turner J.C. The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2008, 12(4):330-352.
23. Thomas E.F., McGarty C., Mavor K.I. Transforming "Apathy into Movement": The role of prosocial emotions in motivating action for social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2009, 13:310-333.
24. van Zomeren M., Postmes T., Spears R. Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspective. Psychological Bulletin 2008, 134:504-535.
25. Wolsko C., Park B., Judd C.M., Wittenbrink B. Framing interethnic ideology: Effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 78:635-654.
26. Wright S.C., Lubensky M. The struggle for social equality: Collective action vs. prejudice reduction. Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities 2008, 291-310. Psychology Press, New York. S. Demoulin, J.P. Leyens, J.F. Dovidio (Eds.).
27. Wright S.C., Tropp L.R. Collective action in response to disadvantage: Intergroup perceptions, social identification, and social change. Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration 2002, 200-236. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US. I. Walker, H.J. Smith, I. Walker, H.J. Smith (Eds.).