Deliberation Versus Intuition: Decomposing the Role of Expertise in Judgment and Decision Making

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 285-294

  Dijkstra, Koen A ^a,b   van der Pligt, Joop ^a   van Kleef, Gerben A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Deliberation; Experience; Expertise; Intuition; Judgment and decision making; Knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879601673     PISSN: 08943257     EISSN: 10990771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1759     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Albrechtsen, J. S., Meissner, C. A., & Susa, K. J. (2009). Can intuition improve deception detection performance? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1052-1055.
2. Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 610-620.
3. Betsch, T. (2008). The nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 3-22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. London: Macmillan.
5. Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), Heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 167-196). New York: Academic Press.
6. Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Van der Leij, A., & Van Baaren, R. B. (2009). Predicting soccer matches after unconscious and conscious thought as a function of expertise. Psychological Science, 20, 1381-1387.
7. Dijkstra, K. A., Van der Pligt, J., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Where intuition resides: Effects of processing style on affective reactions and processing fluency. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8. Dijkstra, K. A., Van der Pligt, J., Van Kleef, G. A., & Kertsholt, J. H. (in press). Deliberation versus intuition: Global versus local processing in judgment and choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
9. Englich, B., & Soder, K. (2009). Moody experts-How mood and expertise influence judgmental anchoring. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 41-50.
10. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
11. Fallshore, M., & Schooler, J. W. (1995). Verbal vulnerability of perceptual expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1608-1623.
12. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1-17.
13. Förster, J. (2009). Relations between perceptual and conceptual scope: How global versus local processing fits a focus on similarity versus dissimilarity search. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 138, 88-111.
14. Förster, J., & Dannenberg, L. (2010). GLOMO sys: A systems account of global versus local processing. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 175-197.
15. Förster, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16, 631-636.
16. Förster, J., Friedman R. S., Özelsel A., & Denzler M. (2006) Enactment of approach and avoidance behavior influences the scope of perceptual and conceptual attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 133-146
17. Gasper, K., & Clore, G. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 34-40.
18. Groves, M. O'Rourke, P., & Alexander, H. (2003). Clinical reasoning: The relative contribution of identification, interpretation, and hypothesis errors to misdiagnosis. Medical Teacher, 25, 621-625.
19. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
20. Halberstadt, J. B., & Green, J. (2008). Carryover effects of analytic thought on preference quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1199-1203.
21. Halberstadt, J. B., & Levine, G. M. (1999). Effects of reasons analysis on the accuracy of predicting basketball games. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 517-530.
22. Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
23. Hogarth, R. M. (2010): Intuition: A challenge for psychological research on decision making. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 338-353.
24. Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64, 515-526.
25. Kimble, G. A., & Perlmuter, L. C. (1970). The problem of volition. Psychological Review, 77, 361-384.
26. Klein, G. A. (1993). A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 138-147). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27. Klein, G. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Langer, E. J., & Imber, L. G. (1979). When practice makes imperfect: Debilitating effects of overlearning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2014-2024.
29. Melcher, J. M., & Schooler, J. W. (1996). The misrememberance of wines past: Verbal and perceptual expertise differentially mediate verbal overshadowing of taste memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 231-245.
30. Melcher, J. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2004). Perceptual and conceptual training mediate the verbal overshadowing effect in an unfamiliar domain. Memory & Cognition, 32, 618-631.
31. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
32. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
33. Nordgren, L. F., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2009). The devil is in the deliberation: Thinking too much reduces preference consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 39-46.
34. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1993). On the origin of the intermediate effect in clinical case recall. Memory and Cognition, 21, 338-351.
36. Schooler, J. W. (2002). Verbalization produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 989-997.
37. Schooler, J. W., & Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
38. Spence, M. T., & Brucks, M. (1997). The moderating effects of problem characteristics on experts' and novices' judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 233-247.
39. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 138, 39-63.
40. Tordesillas, R. S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). Thinking too much of too little? The effects of introspection on the decision-making process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 623-629.
41. Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192.
42. Wilson, T. D., Dunn, D. S., Kraft, D., & Lisle, D. J. (1989a). Introspection, attitude change, and attitude-behavior consistency: The disruptive effects of explaining why we feel the way we do. In L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 287-343). New York: Academic Press.
43. Wilson, T. D., Hodges, S. D., & LaFleur, S. J. (1995). Effects of introspecting about reasons: Inferring attitudes from accessible thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 16-28.
44. Wilson, T. D., Kraft, D., & Dunn, D. S. (1989b). The disruptive effects of explaining attitudes: The moderating effect of knowledge about the attitude object. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 379-400.
45. Wilson, T. D., Lisle, D., Schooler, J., Hodges, S. D., Klaaren, K. & LaFleur, S. (1993). Introspecting about reasons can reduce post-choice satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 331-339
46. Witteman, C. L. M., & Van den Bercken, J. H. L. (2007). Intermediate effects in psychodiagnostic classification. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 56-61.
47. Yamada, A. (2009). Appreciating art verbally: Verbalization can make a work of art be both undeservedly loved and unjustly maligned. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1140-1143.