Improving compliance with postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: An interventional study using a continuous quality improvement initiative

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 97-103

  Sanaka, Madhusudhan R ^a   Super, Dennis M ^a   Feldman, Edward S ^a   Mullen, Kevin D ^a   Ferguson, D R ^a   McCullough, Arthur J ^a  

^a METROHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CENTER; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; POLYP; POLYPECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY CONTROL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT INDICATION;

COLONOSCOPY; EFFECT MODIFIERS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); HUMANS; INTESTINAL POLYPS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 29244465826     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.08.048     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. D.K. Rex, and D.A. Lieberman Feasibility of colonoscopy screening: discussion of issues and recommendations regarding implementation Gastrointest Endosc 54 2001 662 667
2. D.A. Lieberman, P.L. De Garmo, and D.E. Fleischer Patterns of endoscopy use in the United States Gastroenterology 118 2000 619 624
3. D.N. Prajapati, K. Saeian, and D.G. Binion Volume and yield of screening colonoscopy at a tertiary medical center after change in medicare reimbursement Am J Gastroenterol 98 2003 194 199
4. M.L. Brown, C.N. Klabunde, and P. Mysliwiec Current capacity for endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the United States: data from the National Cancer Institute Survey of Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices Am J Med 115 2003 129 133
5. L.C. Seeff, T.B. Richards, and J.A. Shapiro How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity Gastroenterology 127 2004 1670 1677
6. T.R. Levi Colonoscopy capacity: can we build it? Will they come? Gastroenterology 127 2004 1841 1849
7. S. Winawer, R. Fletcher, and D. Rex Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale: update based on new evidence Gastroenterology 124 2003 544 560
8. J.H. Bond Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with colorectal polyps Am J Gastroenterol 95 2000 3053 3063
9. G.M. Eisen, R. Chutkan, and J.L. Goldstein Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance Gastrointest Endosc 51 2000 777 782
10. R.A. Smith, C.J. Mettlin, and K.J. Davis American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer CA Cancer J Clin 50 2000 34 49
11. T.H. Baron, B.D. Kimery, and D. Sorbi Strategies to address increased demand for colonoscopy: guidelines in an open endoscopy practice Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2 2004 178 182
12. K.B. Knopf, J.L. Warren, and E.J. Feuer Bowel surveillance patterns after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer in Medicare beneficiaries Gastrointest Endosc 54 2001 563 571
13. D.K. Rex Postpolypectomy and post-cancer resection surveillance Rev Gastroenterol Disord 3 2003 202 209
14. M. Chang, and P.C. Schroy 3rd Endoscopic colorectal cancer screening: can supply meet demand? Gastroenterology 126 2004 1482 1485
15. P.A. Mysliwiec, M.L. Brown, and C.N. Klabunde Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy Ann Intern Med 141 2004 264 271
16. P.A. Bampton, J.J. Sandford, and G.P. Young Applying evidence-based guidelines improves use of colonoscopy resources in patients with a moderate risk of colorectal neoplasia Med J Aust 176 2002 55 57
17. D.A. Redelmeier, C.M. Bell, and A.S. Detsky Charges for medical care at different hospitals Arch Intern Med 160 2000 1417 1422
18. L. Maynard, and M.P. Jones Preliminary determination of indirect costs of screening colonoscopy [abstract] Gastroenterology A69 2003 549
19. G. Olds, P. Singh, and A. Chak Colonoscopic surveillance of adenomatous polyps: a survey of primary care physicians knowledge of current guidelines [abstract] Gastrointest Endosc 59 2004 AB277
20. D.K. Rex, C.S. Cutler, and G.T. Lemmel Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies Gastroenterology 112 1997 24 28
21. G. Hoff, M. Bretthauer, and T. Grotmol Differences in detection rates of colorectal polyps and adenomas among endoscopists in population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening [abstract] Gastrointest Endosc 55 2002 AB214
22. D.A. Lieberman Cost-effectiveness model for colon cancer screening Gastroenterology 109 1995 1781 1790
23. D.K. Rex Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication Am J Gastroenterol 90 1995 353 365
24. P.J. Greco, and J.M. Eisenberg Changing physicians' practices N Engl J Med 329 1994 1271 1274
25. J.T. Ziegenfuss Jr., and C.K. McKenna Ten tools of continuous quality improvement: a review and case example of hospital discharge Am J Med Qual 10 1995 213 220
26. J.B. O'Connor, S.S. Sondhi, and K.D. Mullen A continuous quality improvement initiative reduces inappropriate prescribing of prophylactic antibiotics for endoscopic procedures Am J Gastroenterol 94 1999 2115 2121
27. J.A. Hay, L. Maldonado, and S.R. Weingarten Prospective evaluation of a clinical guideline recommending hospital length of stay in upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage JAMA 278 1997 2151 2156
28. M.J. Arblaster, B.T. Collopy, and P.R. Elliott Colonoscopy in a private hospital: continuous quality improvement in practice Aust Clin Rev 12 1992 71 76
29. A.G. Zauber, S.J. Winawer, and F. Loeve Effect of initial polypectomy versus surveillance polypectomy on colorectal cancer incidence reduction: micro-simulation modeling of national polyp study data [abstract] Gastroenterology 118 2000 A187
30. W.H. Verstappen, T. van der Weijden, and G. ter Riet Block design allowed for control of the Hawthorne effect in a randomized controlled trial of test ordering J Clin Epidemiol 57 2004 1119 1123