Influence of sub-micron surface patterns on the deposition of model proteins during active filtration

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 444, Issue , 2013, Pages 420-428

  Maruf, Sajjad H ^a   Rickman, Melissa ^a   Wang, Liang ^a   Mersch IV, John ^a   Greenberg, Alan R ^a   Pellegrino, John ^a   Ding, Yifu ^a  

^a University of Colorado at Boulder   (United States)

Author keywords

Nanoimprint; Protein fouling; Ultrafiltration membrane

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION CONDITIONS; BOVINE SERUM ALBUMINS; FILTRATION EXPERIMENTS; IMPRINTED MEMBRANES; NANO-IMPRINT; POLYETHERSULFONE ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANE; PROTEIN FOULING; ULTRA-FILTRATION MEMBRANES;

ADSORPTION; DEPOSITION; EXPERIMENTS; HYDRODYNAMICS; IONIC STRENGTH; MEMBRANES; NANOIMPRINT LITHOGRAPHY; PROTEINS; TEXTILE PRINTING; ULTRAFILTRATION;

MICROFILTRATION;

BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN; POLYETHERSULFONE;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; BIOFOULING; HYDRODYNAMICS; MEMBRANE FILTER; MOLECULAR IMPRINTING; MORPHOLOGY; NANOFABRICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SIMULATION; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 84879547523     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.060     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Howe K.J., Clark M.M. Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:3571-3576.
2. Boyd R.F., Zydney A.L. Analysis of protein fouling during ultrafiltration using a two-layer membrane model. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1998, 59:451-460.
3. Marshall A.D., Munro P.A., Tragardh G. The effect of protein fouling in microfiltration and ultrafiltration on permeate flux, protein retention and selectivity: a literature review. Desalination 1993, 91:65-108.
4. Belfort G., Davis R.H., Zydney A.L. The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 96:1-58.
5. An L., He D., Jing J., Ma R., Jiang Z., Kou X. Mechanical properties and miscibility of polyethersulfone/phenoxy blends. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, 59:1843-1847.
6. Kim I.C., Lee K.H. Dyeing process wastewater treatment using fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2006, 192:246-251.
7. Luo M.L., Zhao J.Q., Tang W., Pu C.S. Hydrophilic modification of poly(ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membrane surface by self-assembly of TiO2 nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2005, 249:76-84.
8. Reddy A.V.R., Mohan D.J., Bhattacharya A., Shah V.J., Ghosh P.K. Surface modification of ultrafiltration membranes by preadsorption of a negatively charged polymer: I. Permeation of water soluble polymers and inorganic salt solutions and fouling resistance properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 214:211-221.
9. Wang P., Tan K.L., Kang E.T., Neoh K.G. Synthesis, characterization and anti-fouling properties of poly(ethylene glycol) grafted poly(vinylidene fluoride) copolymer membranes. J. Mater. Chem. 2001, 11:783-789.
10. Rana D., Matsuura T. Surface modifications for antifouling membranes. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110:2448-2471.
11. Gekas V., Hallstrom B. Mass transfer in the membrane concentration polarization layer under turbulent cross flow: I. Critical literature review and adaptation of existing sherwood correlations to membrane operations. J. Membr. Sci. 1987, 30:153-170.
12. Belfort G. Membrane modules: comparison of different configurations using fluid mechanics. J. Membr. Sci. 1988, 35:245-270.
13. Cleaver J.W., Yates B. Mechanism of detachment of colloidal particles from a flat substrate in a turbulent flow. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1973, 44:464-474.
14. Gutman R.G. Membrane Filtration: The Technology of Pressure-Driven Crossflow Processes 1987, Adam Hilger, Bristol.
15. Jeffree M.A., Peacock J., Sobey I.J., Bellhouse B.J. Gel layer limited haemofiltration rates can be increased by vortex mixing. Ren. Fail. 1981, 5:373-380.
16. van der Waal M.J., Stevanovic S., Racz I.G. Mass transfer in corrugated-plate membrane modules. II. Ultrafiltration experiments. J. Membr. Sci. 1989, 40:261-275.
17. Belfort G., Mikulasek P., Pimbley J.M., Chung K.Y. Diagnosis of membrane fouling using a rotating annular filter. 2. Dilute particle suspensions of known particle size. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 77:23-39.
18. Winzeler H.B., Belfort G. Enhanced performance for pressure-driven membrane processes: the argument for fluid instabilities. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 80:35-47.
19. Chung K.Y., Bates R., Belfort G. Dean vortices with wall flux in a curved channel membrane system: 4. Effect of vortices on permeation fluxes of suspensions in microporous membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 81:139-150.
20. Belfort G., Nagata N. Fluid mechanics and cross-flow filtration: some thoughts. Desalination 1985, 53:57-79.
21. Engler J., Wiesner M.R. Particle fouling of a rotating membrane disk. Water Res. 2000, 34:557-565.
22. Gupta B.B., Howell J.A., Wu D., Field R.W. A helical baffle for cross-flow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 102:31-42.
23. Kim M., Lin N.H., Lewis G.T., Cohen Y. Surface nano-structuring of reverse osmosis membranes via atmospheric pressure plasma-induced graft polymerization for reduction of mineral scaling propensity. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 354,:142-149.
24. Lin N.H., Kim M., Lewis G.T., Cohen Y. Polymer surface nano-structuring of reverse osmosis membranes for fouling resistance and improved flux performance. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20:4642-4652.
25. Moulai-Mostefa N., Akoum O., Nedjihoui M., Ding L., Jaffrin M.Y. Comparison between rotating disk and vibratory membranes in the ultrafiltration of oil-in-water emulsions. Desalination 2007, 206:494-498.
26. Ngene I.S., Lammertink R.G.H., Wessling M., Van der Meer W.G.J. Particle deposition and biofilm formation on microstructured membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 364:43-51.
27. Schwinge J., Neal P.R., Wiley D.E., Fletcher D.F., Fane A.G. Spiral wound modules and spacers: review and analysis. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 242:129-153.
28. van der Waal M.J., Racz I.G. Mass transfer in corrugated-plate membrane modules. I. Hyperfiltration experiments. J. Membr. Sci. 1989, 40:243-260.
29. Vogelaar L., Lammertink R.G.H., Wessling M. Superhydrophobic surfaces having two-fold adjustable roughness prepared in a single step. Langmuir 2006, 22:3125-3130.
30. Girones M., Akbarsyah I.J., Nijdam W., van Rijn C.J.M., Jansen H.V., Lammertink R.G.H., Wessling M. Polymeric microsieves produced by phase separation micromolding. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 283:411-424.
31. Vogelaar L., Barsema J.N., van Rijn C.J.M., Nijdam W., Wessling M. Phase separation micromolding?PS?M. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15:1385-1389.
32. Vogelaar L., Lammertink R.G.H., Barsema J.N., Nijdam W., Bolhuis-Versteeg L.A.M., van?Rijn C.J.M., Wessling M. Phase separation micromolding: a new generic approach for microstructuring various materials. Small 2005, 1:645-655.
33. Won Y.J., Lee J., Choi D.C., Chae H.R., Kim I., Lee C.H., Kim I.C. Preparation and application of patterned membranes for wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:11021-11027.
34. Culfaz P.Z., Rolevink E., van Rijn C., Lammertink R.G.H., Wessling M. Microstructured hollow fibers for ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 347:32-41.
35. Culfaz P.Z., Buetehorn S., Utiu L., Kueppers M., Bluemich B., Melin T., Wessling M., Lammertink R.G.H. Fouling behavior of microstructured hollow fiber membranes in dead-end filtrations: critical flux determination and NMR imaging of particle deposition. Langmuir 2011, 27:1643-1652.
36. Lee Y.K., Won Y.J., Yoo J.H., Ahn K.H., Lee C.H. Flow analysis and fouling on the patterned membrane surface. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 427:320-325.
37. Maruf S.H., Wang L., Greenberg A.R., Pellegrino J., Ding Y. Use of nanoimprinted surface patterns to mitigate colloidal deposition on ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 428:598-607.
38. Kim K.J., Fane A.G., Ben Aim R., Liu M.G., Jonsson G., Tessaro I.C., Broek A.P., Bargeman D. A comparative study of techniques used for porous membrane characterization: pore characterization. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 87:35-46.
39. Kujundzic E., Greenberg A.R., Fong R., Hernandez M. Monitoring protein fouling on polymeric membranes using ultrasonic frequency-domain reflectometry. Membranes 2011, 1:195-216.
40. Muthukumaran S., Yang K., Seuren A., Kentish S., Ashokkumar M., Stevens G.W., Grieser F. The use of ultrasonic cleaning for ultrafiltration membranes in the dairy industry. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 39:99-107.
41. Matthiasson E. The role of macromolecular adsorption in fouling of ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1983, 16:23-36.
42. Ko M.K., Pellegrino J., Nassimbene R., Marko P. Characterization of the adsorption-fouling layer using globular proteins on ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 76:101-120.
43. Lee J.H., Wang L., Kooi S., Boyce M.C., Thomas E.L. Enhanced energy dissipation in periodic epoxy nanoframes. Nano Lett. 2010, 10:2592-2597.
44. Zeman L.J., Zydney A.L. Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration?Principles and Applications 1996, Marcel Dekker, New York.
45. Chiang Y.C., Chang Y., Higuchi A., Chen W.Y., Ruaan R.C. Sulfobetaine-grafted poly(vinylidene fluoride) ultrafiltration membranes exhibit excellent antifouling property. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 339:151-159.
46. Nabe A., Staude E., Belfort G. Surface modification of polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes and fouling by BSA solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 133:57-72.
47. Seidel A., Elimelech M. Coupling between chemical and physical interactions in natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes: implications for fouling control. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 203:245-255.
48. Lawson K.W., Hall M.S., Lloyd D.R. Compaction of microporous membranes used in membrane distillation. I. Effect on gas permeability. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 101:99-108.
49. van den Berg G.B., Smolders C.A. Flux decline in ultrafiltration processes. Desalination 1990, 77:101-133.
50. Jones K.L., O'Melia C.R. Protein and humic acid adsorption onto hydrophilic membrane surfaces: effects of pH and ionic strength. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 165:31-46.
51. Ko M.K., Pellegrino J. Determination of osmotic-pressure and fouling resistances and their effects on performance of ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1992, 74:141-157.
52. Chang Y., Ko C.Y., Shih Y.J., Quemener D., Deratani A., Wei T.C., Wang D.M., Lai J.Y. Surface grafting control of PEGylated poly(vinylidene fluoride) antifouling membrane via surface-initiated radical graft copolymerization. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 345:160-169.
53. Celik E., Liu L., Choi H. Protein fouling behavior of carbon nanotube/polyethersulfone composite membranes during water filtration. Water Res. 2011, 45:5287-5294.
54. Burns D.B., Zydney A.L. Effect of solution pH on protein transport through ultrafiltration membranes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1999, 64:27-37.
55. Mockel D., Staude E., Guiver M.D. Static protein adsorption, ultrafiltration behavior and cleanability of hydrophilized polysulfone membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 158:63-75.
56. Salgin S., Salgin U., Soyer N. Streaming potential measurements of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes to determine salt effects on membrane zeta potential. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013, 8:4073-4084.
57. Ariza M.J., Benavente J. Streaming potential along the surface of polysulfone membranes: a comparative study between two different experimental systems and determination of electrokinetic and adsorption parameters. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 190:119-132.
58. Brown L., Narsimhan G., Wankat P.C. Foam fractionation of globular proteins. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1990, 36:947-959.
59. Wallevik K. Spontaneous in vivo isomerization of bovine serum albumin as a determinant of its normal catabolism. J. Clin. Invest. 1976, 57:398-407.
60. Aimar P., Baklouti S., Sanchez V. Membrane?solute interactions: influence on pure solvent transfer during ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1986, 29:207-224.
61. Suki A., Fane A.G., Fell C.J.D. Flux decline in protein ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1984, 21:269-283.
62. Swaminathan T., Chaudhuri M., Sirkar K.K. Effect of pH on solvent flux during stirred ultrafiltration of proteins. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1981, 23:1873-1880.
63. Bloomfield V. The structure of bovine serum albumin at low pH. Biochemistry 1966, 5:684-689.
64. Ang W.S., Elimelech M. Protein (BSA) fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: implications for wastewater reclamation. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 296:83-92.
65. Jones K.L., O'Melia C.R. Ultrafiltration of protein and humic substances: effect of solution chemistry on fouling and flux decline. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 193:163-173.
66. Zhang Z., Dalgleish D.G., Goff H.D. Effect of pH and ionic strength on competitive protein adsorption to air/water interfaces in aqueous foams made with mixed milk proteins. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2004, 34:113-121.
67. Santos O., Nylander T., Paulsson M., Tragardh C. Whey protein adsorption onto steel surfaces?effect of temperature, flow rate, residence time and aggregation. J. Food Eng. 2006, 74:468-483.
68. Stroock A.D., Dertinger S.K.W., Ajdari A., Mezic I., Stone H.A., Whitesides G.M. Chaotic mixer for microchannels. Science 2002, 295:647-651.
69. Stroock A.D., Whitesides G.M. Controlling flows in microchannels with patterned surface charge and topography. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36:597-604.
70. Mc Donogh R.M., Bauser H., Stroh N., Grauschopf U. Experimental in situ measurement of concentration polarisation during ultra- and micro-filtration of bovine serum albumin and Dextran Blue solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 104:51-63.