A hybrid visualisation model for technology roadmapping: Bibliometrics, qualitative methodology and empirical study

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 707-724

  Zhang, Yi ^a   Guo, Ying ^a   Wang, Xuefeng ^a   Zhu, Donghua ^a   Porter, Alan L ^b  

^a BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

bibliometrics; electric vehicles; qualitative methodologies; technology roadmapping; term frequency analysis

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; ELECTRIC VEHICLE; FORECASTING METHOD; MAPPING; NUMERICAL MODEL; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84879510427     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2013.803064     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A. and Caprasecca, A. 2009. Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help?. Research Policy, 38: 206 - 15. (doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.001)
2. Chen, Y. and Chang, K. 2010. Exploring the nonlinear effects of patent citations, patent share and relative patent position on market value in the US pharmaceutical industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22: 153 - 69. (doi:10.1080/09537320903498496)
3. Choi, C. and Park, Y. 2009. Monitoring the organic structure of technology based on the patent development paths. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 76: 754 - 68. (doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.007)
4. Cozzens, S., Gatchair, S., Kang, J., Kim, K., Lee, H., Ordonez, G. and Porter, A. 2010. Emerging technologies: Quantitative identification and measurement. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22: 361 - 76. (doi:10.1080/09537321003647396)
5. Criscuolo, P. and Verspagen, B. 2008. Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor vs. examiner citations in European patents. Research Policy, 37: 1892 - 908. (doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.011)
6. Daim, T. U., Rueda, G. and Martin, H. 2006. Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 73: 981 - 1012. (doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.04.004)
7. Duan, C. 2011. Mapping the intellectual structure of modern technology management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23: 583 - 600. (doi:10.1080/09537325.2011.565672)
8. EIRMA. 1997. " Technology roadmapping - delivering business vision ". Working Group Report 52, European Industrial Research Management Association.
9. Fu, H., Ho, Y. and Sui, Y. 2010. A bibliometric analysis of solid waste research during the period 1993-2008. Waste Management, 30: 2410 - 17. (doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.06.008)
10. Garcia, M. L. 1997. " Introduction to technology roadmapping: The semiconductor industry association's technology roadmapping process ". Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND 97-0665.
11. Garcia, M. L. and Bray, O. H. 1998. " Fundamentals of technology roadmapping ". 3 - 34. Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND 97-0665
12. Gerdsri, N. and Kocaoglu, D. F. 2007. Applying the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to build a strategic framework for technology roadmapping. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46: 1071 - 80. (doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.015)
13. Gerdsri, N., Assakul, P. and Vatananan, R. S. 2010. An activity guideline for technology roadmapping implementation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22: 229 - 42. (doi:10.1080/09537320903498553)
14. Goodall, A. H. 2009. Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities. Research Policy, 38: 1079 - 92. (doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.04.002)
15. Guo, Y., Huang, L. and Porter, A. L. 2010. The research profiling method applied to nano-enhanced, thin-film solar cells. R&D Management, 40: 195 - 208.
16. Huang, L., Guo, Y., Peng, Z. and Porter, A. L. 2011. Characterising a technology development at the stage of early emerging applications: Nanomaterial-enhanced biosensors. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23: 527 - 44. (doi:10.1080/09537325.2011.565666)
17. Hufker, T. and Alpert, F. 1994. Patents: A managerial perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 3: 44 - 54. (doi:10.1108/10610429410073138)
18. Jeon, J., Lee, H. and Park, Y. 2011. Implementing technology roadmapping with supplier selection for semiconductor manufacturing companies. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23: 899 - 918. (doi:10.1080/09537325.2011.604156)
19. Juznic, P., Peclin, S., Zaucer, M., Mandelj, T., Pusnik, M. and Demsar, F. 2010. Scientometric indicators: Peer-review, bibliometric methods and conflict of interests. Scientometrics, 85: 429 - 41. (doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0230-8)
20. Kajikawa, Y. and Takeda, Y. 2009. Citation network analysis of organic LEDs. Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 76: 1115 - 23. (doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2009.04.004)
21. Lai, K. and Wu, S. 2005. Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system. Information Processing & Management, 41: 313 - 30. (doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2003.11.004)
22. Lee, S. and Park, Y. 2005. Customization of technology roadmaps according to roadmapping purposes: Overall process and detailed modules. Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 72: 567 - 83. (doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2004.11.006)
23. Lee, Y. and Song, Y. 2007. Selecting the key research areas in nano-technology field using technology cluster analysis: A case study based on national R&D programs in South Korea. Technovation, 27: 57 - 64. (doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2006.04.003)
24. Lee, S., Yoon, B. and Lee, C. 2009. Business planning based on technological capabilities: Patent analysis for technology-driven roadmapping. Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 76: 769 - 86. (doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2009.01.003)
25. Li, R. and Meng, L. 2010. Difference between paper citations and patent citations in the presentation of knowledge link [in Chinese]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 29: 474 - 78.
26. Liu, F. and Sun, Y. 2009. A comparison of the spatial distribution of innovative activities in China and the US. Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 76: 797 - 805. (doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.12.002)
27. McMillan, G. S. and Hicks, D. 2001. Science and corporate strategy: A bibliometric update of Hounshell and Smith. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 13: 497 - 505.
28. McMillan, G. S. and Hamilton, R. D. III. 2000. Using bibliometrics to measure firm knowledge: An analysis of the US pharmaceutical industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12: 465 - 75. (doi:10.1080/09537320020004168)
29. Meyer, M., Debackere, K. and Glänzel, W. 2010. Can applied science be 'good science'? Exploring the relationship between patent citations and citation impact in nanoscience. Scientometrics, 85: 527 - 39. (doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0154-3)
30. Moed, H. F. 2002. Measuring China's research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 53: 281 - 96. (doi:10.1023/A:1014812810602)
31. Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J.P. and Probert, D. R. 2004. Technology roadmapping - a planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 71: 5 - 26. (doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00072-6)
32. Porter, A. L., Youtie, J. and Shapira, P. 2008. Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10: 715 - 28. (doi:10.1007/s11051-007-9266-y)
33. Porter, A. L. and Detampel, M. J. 1995. Technology opportunity analysis. Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 49: 237 - 55. (doi:10.1016/0040-1625(95)00022-3)
34. Price, D. J. 1963. Little science, big science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35. Rip, A. and Kemp, R. 1998. " Technological change ". In Human choice and climate change, Edited by: Rayner, S. and Malone, E. L. Vol. 2, 327 - 99. Columbus, OH: Batelle Press.
36. Russo, D. Knowledge extraction from patent: Achievements and open problems. Global product development. Proceedings of the 20th CIRP Design Conference. April 19-21 2010, Ecole Centrale de Nantes, Nantes, France. Edited by: Bernard, A. pp. 567 - 76. Berlin: Springer.
37. Shen, Y., Chang, S. and Lin, G. 2010. A hybrid selection model for emerging technology. Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 77: 151 - 66. (doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2009.05.001)
38. Van Eck, N. J. and Waltman, L. 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84: 523 - 38. (doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3)
39. Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L. and Noyons, E. C.M. 2010. Automatic term identification for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 82: 581 - 96. (doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0173-0)
40. Van Raan, A. F.J. 1996. Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics, 36: 397 - 420. (doi:10.1007/BF02129602)
41. Van Raan, A. F.J. 2003. The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technikfolgenabschätzung, 1: 20 - 29.
42. Van Raan, A. F.J. 2005. For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3 (1): 50 - 62. (doi:10.1207/s15366359mea0301_7)
43. Walsh, S. T. 2004. Roadmapping a disruptive technology: A case study - the emerging micro systems and top-down nano systems industry. Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 71: 161 - 85. (doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2003.10.003)
44. Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J. and Noyons, E. C.M. 2010. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4: 629 - 35. (doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002)
45. Willyard, C. H. and McClees, C. W. 1987. Motorola's technology roadmap process. Research Management, 30 (5): 13 - 19.
46. Winebrake, J. J. 2003. Alternate energy: Assessment and implementation reference book, Atlanta, GA: Fairmont Press.
47. Winebrake, J. J. 2004. Technology roadmaps as a tool for energy planning and policy decisions. Energy Engineering, 101 (4): 20 - 36.
48. Yin, R. 1998. Case study research: Design and methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Yoon, B. 2010. Strategic visualisation tools for managing technological information. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22: 377 - 97. (doi:10.1080/09537321003647438)
50. Yoon, B. and Park, Y. 2005. A systematic approach for identifying technology opportunities: Keyword-based morphology analysis. Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 72: 145 - 60. (doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.011)
51. Zhang, Y., Zhu, D., Wang, X. and Guo, Y. Composing technology roadmapping according to bibliometrics: Hybrid model and empirical study. Proceedings of 2011 international conference on computer communication and management. Edited by: Zhang, T. Vol. 8, pp. 405 - 510. Singapore: IACSIT Press.
52. Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Guo, Y. and Zhu, D. 2011b. The research on refining China's patent search terms. Studies in Science of Science [in Chinese], 29: 833 - 39.
53. Zhu, D. and Porter, A. L. 2002. Automated extraction and visualization of information for technological intelligence and forecasting. Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 69: 495 - 506. (doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00157-3)