Erratum to "Business planning based on technological capabilities: Patent analysis for technology-driven roadmapping" [Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 76 (2009) 769-786] (DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2009.01.003);Business planning based on technological capabilities: Patent analysis for technology-driven roadmapping

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 76, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 769-786

  Lee, Sungjoo ^a,b   Yoon, Byungun ^c   Lee, Changyong ^d   Park, Jinwoo ^d  

^a Ajou University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c Dongguk University   (South Korea)

^d Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Citation analysis; Network analysis; Patent analysis; RFID; Roadmapping; Technology roadmap; Text mining

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; PLANNING; RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID);

CITATION ANALYSIS; PATENT ANALYSIS; ROADMAPPING; TECHNOLOGY ROADMAPS; TEXT MINING;

RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

BENCHMARKING; BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT; DECISION MAKING; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; PLANNING METHOD; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 67349113980     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.08.001     Document Type: Erratum

References (66)

1. Ali A., Krapfel Jr. R., and Labahn D. Product innovativeness and entry strategy: impact on cycle time and break-even time. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 12 (1995) 54-69
2. Henard D.H., and Szymanski D.M. Why some products are more successful than others. J. Mark. Res. 38 (August 2001) 362-375
3. Groenveld P. Roadmapping integrates business and technology. Res. Technol. Manag. 40 5 (1997) 48-55
4. Phaal R., Farrukh C.J., and Probert D.R. Technology roadmapping: a planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 71 1-2 (2004) 5-26
5. Rinne M. Technology roadmaps: infrastructure for innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 71 1 (2004) 67-80
6. Garcia M.L., and Bray O.H. Fundamentals of Technology Roadmapping (1998), Sandia National Labs, Albuquerque
7. Kostoff R.N., and Schaller R.R. Science and technology roadmaps. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 48 2 (2001) 132-143
8. Albright R.E., and Kappel T.A. Roadmapping in the corporation. Res. Technol. Manag. 46 2 (2003) 31-40
9. Drucker P.F. The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review (1998) 149-157
10. Amit R., and Schoemaker P. Strategic assets and organizational rents. Strateg. Manage. J. 4 (1993) 33-47
11. Galbreath J. Which resources matter the most to firm success? An exploratory study of resource-based theory. Technovation 25 9 (2005) 979-987
12. Michalisin M.D., Smith R.D., and Kline D.M. In search of strategic assets. Int. J. Organ. Anal. 5 (1997) 360-387
13. Ernst H. Patent information for strategic technology management. World Pat. Inf. 25 3 (2003) 233-242
14. Archibugi D., and Pianta M. Innovation surveys and patents as technology indicators: the state of the art. Innovation, Patents and Technological Strategies (1996), OECD, Paris
15. Karki M. Patent citation analysis: a policy analysis tool. World Pat. Inf. 19 4 (1997) 269-272
16. Patel P., and Pavitt K. The technological competencies of the world's largest firms: complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Res. Policy 26 2 (1997) 141-156
17. Ernst H. Patent portfolios for strategic R&D planning. J. Eng. Technol. Manage. 15 4 (1998) 279-308
18. Lee S., and Park Y. Customization of technology roadmaps according to roadmapping purposes: overall process and detailed modules. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 72 5 (2005) 567-583
19. Phaal R., Farrukh C.J., Mills J.F., and Probert D.R. Customizing the technology roadmapping approach. Proceedings of the PICMET'03, Portland (2003)
20. Barker D., and Smith D. Technology foresight using roadmaps. Long Range Plan. 28 2 (1995) 21-28
21. Willyard C., and McClees C. Motorola's technology roadmap process. Res. Manage. 30 5 (1987) 13-19
22. Phaal R., Farrukh C., and Probert D. Developing a technology roadmapping system. Proceedings of the 2005 PICMET, Portland (2005)
23. Saritas O., and Oner M. Systemic analysis of UK foresight results: joint application of integrated management model and roadmapping. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 71 1 (2004) 27-65
24. Moehrle M.G. TRIZ-based technology-roadmapping. Int. J. Technol. Intell. Plan. 1 1 (2004) 87-99
25. Lizaso F., and Reger G. Linking roadmapping and scenarios as an approach for strategic technology planning. Int. J. Technol. Intell. Plan. 1 1 (2004) 68-86
26. Vojak B.A., and Chambers F.A. Roadmapping disruptive technical threats and opportunities in complex, technology-based subsystems: the SAILS methodology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 71 1 (2004) 121-139
27. Walsh S.T. Roadmapping a disruptive technology: a case study the emerging microsystems and top-down nanosystems industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 71 1-2 (2004) 161-185
28. Brown R., and O'Hare S. The use of technology roadmapping as an enabler of knowledge management. IEE 7 (2001) 1-6
29. Petrick I.J., and Echols A.E. Technology roadmapping in review: a tool for making sustainable new product development decisions. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 71 1 (2004) 81-100
30. Nakamura K., Aoki T., Hosoya M., Fukuzawa4 Y., and Kameoka A. A roadmapping practice for enhancing the Japanese engineering service towards advanced IT network age. Proceedings of the 2006 PICMET, Portland (2006)
31. Lee S., Kang S., Park E., and Park Y. Technology roadmapping for R&D planning: case of parts and materials industry in Korea. Technovation 27 (2007) 433-445
32. Kostoff R., Boylan R., and Simons G. Disruptive technology roadmaps. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 71 (2004) 141-159
33. Kostoff R. Systematic acceleration of radical discovery and innovation in science and technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 73 (2006) 923-936
34. Becker H., and Sanders K. Innovations in meta-analysis and social impact analysis relevant for tech mining. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 73 (2006) 966-980
35. Asan S., and Asan U. Qualitative cross-impact analysis with time consideration. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 74 (2007) 627-644
36. Choi C., Kim S., and Park Y. A patent-based cross impact analysis for quantitative estimation of technological impact: the case of information and communication technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 74 (2007) 1296-1314
37. Chang S., Lai K., and Chang S. Exploring technology diffusion and classification of business methods: using the patent citation network. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 76 (2009) 107-117
38. Park Y., Yoon B., and Lee S. The idiosyncrasy and dynamism of technological innovation across industries: patent citation analysis. Technol. Soc. 27 4 (2005) 471-485
39. Narin F., Noma E., and Perry R. Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Res. Policy 16 2-4 (1987) 143-155
40. Mogee M. Using patent data for technology analysis and planning. Res. - Technol. Manage. 4 (1991) 43-49
41. Hirschey M., and Richardson V. Valuation effects of patent quality: a comparison for Japanese and US firms. Pac.-Basin Finance J. 9 (2001) 65-82
42. Fujii A., Iwayama M., and Kando N. Introduction to the special issue on patent processing. Inf. Process. Manag. 43 (2007) 1149-1153
43. Tseng Y., Juang D., Wang Y., and Lin C. Text mining for patent map analysis. Proceedings of IACIS Pacific 2005 Conference, May 19-21, Taipei, Taiwan (2005) 1109-1116
44. Tseng Y., Lin C., and Lin Y. Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Inf. Process. Manag. 43 5 (2007) 1216 1247
45. Yoon B., Phaal R., and David P. Structuring technological information for technology roadmapping. Data mining approach, WSEA Conference, February, Cambridge (2008)
46. Yeap T., Loo G., and Pang S. Computational patent mapping: intelligent agents for nanotechnology. Proceedings of the International Conference on MEMS, NANO and Smart Systems, 20-23 July (2003) 274-278
47. Yoon B., and Park Y. A text-mining-based patent network: analytic tool for high-technology trend. J. High Technol. Managem. Res. 15 1 (2004) 37-50
48. Yoon B., Yoon C., and Park Y. On the development and application of a self-organizing feature map-based patent map. R&D Manage. 32 4 (2002) 291-300
49. Krier M., and Zaccà F. Automatic categorisation applications at the European patent office. World Pat. Inf. 24 (2002) 187-196
50. Larkey L. A patent search and classification system. Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference (1999) 179-187
51. Koster C.H., and Seutter M. Taming wild phrases. In: Sebastiani F. (Ed). Proceedings of ECIR'03, 25th European Conference on Information Retrieval (2003), Springer Verlag, Pisa, IT 161-176
52. Lee S., Lee S., Seol H., and Park Y. Using patent information for designing new product and technology: keyword-based technology roadmapping. R&D Manage. 38 2 (2008) 166-188
53. Scherer F.M. Using linked patent and R&D data to measure inter-industry technology flows. In: Griliches Z. (Ed). R&D, Patents, and Productivity (1981), University of Chicago Press for NBER, Chicago 417-464
54. Hu A., and Jaffe A.B. Patent citations and international knowledge flow: the cases of Korea and Taiwan. NBER Working Paper 8528 (2001)
55. Hu A., and Jaffe A.B. Patent citations and international knowledge flow: the cases of Korea and Taiwan. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 21 (2003) 849-880
56. Jaffe A.B. Demand and supply influences in R&D intensity and productivity growth. Rev. Econ. Stat. 70 3 (1998) 431-437
57. Jaffe A.B., and Tranjtengerg M. International knowledge flows: evidence from patent citations. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 8 (1999) 105-136
58. Ngai E.W.T., Cheng T.C.E., Au S., and Lai K. Mobile commerce integrated with RFID technology in a container depot. Decis. Support Syst. 43 (2007) 62-76
59. Criscuolo P. The 'home advantage' effect and patent families: a comparison of OECD triadic patents, the USPTO and the EPO. Scientometrics 66 1 (2006) 23-41
60. Watabane C., Tsuji Y.S., and Griefy-Brown C. Patent statistics: deciphering a 'real' versus a 'pseudo' proxy of innovation. Technovation 21 12 (2001) 783-790
61. Tijssen R.J.W. Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Res. Policy 30 (2001) 35-54
62. OECD. The Measurement of scientific and technological activities: using patents as science and technology indicators. Patent manual CD (4) 114, OECD, Paris (1994)
63. Verbeek A., Debarckere K., Luwel M., Andries P., Zimmermann E., and Deleus F. Linking science to technology: using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes. Scientometrics 54 3 (2002) 399-420
64. Collins P., and Wyatt S. Citation in patents to the basic research literature. Res. Policy 17 (1988) 65-77
65. Meyer-Krahmer F., and Schmoch U. Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Res. Policy 27 (1998) 835-851
66. Narin F., and Olivastro D. Status report: linkage between technology and science. Res. Policy 21 (1992) 237-330