Does response mode affect amount recalled or the magnitude of the testing effect?

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 36-48

  Putnam, Adam L ^a   Roediger III, Henry L ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Response mode; Retrieval practice; Testing effect

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; LEARNING; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; RECALL; SPEECH; THINKING; WRITING; ARTICLE;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH; THINKING; WRITING;

EID: 84879489180     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0245-x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abbott, E. E. (1909). On the analysis of the factors of recall in the learning process. Psychological Monographs, 11, 159-177.
2. Arnold, K. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2012). Test-potentiated learning: Distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. doi: 10. 1037/a0029199.
3. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory & Cognition, 36, 604-616. doi: 10. 3758/MC. 36. 3. 604.
5. Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., Wixted, J. T., & Vul, E. (2008). The effects of tests on learning and forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 36, 438-448. doi: 10. 3758/MC. 36. 2. 438.
6. Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633-642. doi: 10. 3758/BF03202713.
7. Conway, M. A., & Gathercole, S. E. (1987). Modality and long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 341-361. doi: 10. 1016/0749-596X(87)90118-5.
8. Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory & Cognition, 20, 374-380.
10. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of Judgments of Learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur? Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 545-565.
11. Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York, NY: Dover. Original work published 1885.
12. Finn, B., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2011). Enhancing retention through reconsolidation: Negative emotional arousal following retrieval enhances later recall. Psychological Science, 22, 781-786. doi: 10. 1177/0956797611407932.
13. Gardiner, J. M., Passmore, C., Herriot, P., & Klee, H. (1977). Memory for remembered events: Effects of response mode and response-produced feedback. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 45-54.
14. Gates, A. I. (1917). Recitation as a factor in memorizing. Archives of Psychology, 6, 1-104.
15. Harvey, A. J., & Beaman, C. P. (2007). Input and output modality effects in immediate serial recall. Memory, 15, 693-700.
16. Hopkins, R. H., & Edwards, R. E. (1972). Pronunciation effects in recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 534-537. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(72)80036-7.
17. Izawa, C. (1966). Reinforcement-test sequences in paired-associate learning. Psychological Reports, 18, 879-919.
18. Izawa, C. (1976). Vocalized and silent tests in paired-associate learning. The American Journal of Psychology, 89, 681-693.
19. Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). Test format and corrective feedback modulate the effect of testing on memory retention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 528-558.
20. Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319, 966-968. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1152408.
21. Kellogg, R. T. (2007). Are written and spoken recall of text equivalent? The American Journal of Psychology, 120, 415-428.
22. Kimball, D. R., & Metcalfe, J. (2003). Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory. Memory & Cognition, 31, 918-929.
23. MacLeod, C. M., Gopie, N., Hourihan, K. L., Neary, K. R., & Ozubko, J. D. (2010). The production effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 671-685. doi: 10. 1037/a0018785.
24. McDaniel, M. A., & Masson, M. E. J. (1985). Altering memory representations through retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 371-385.
25. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9.
26. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved from http://w3. usf. edu/FreeAssociation/.
27. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The "delayed-JOL effect. Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
28. Penney, C. G. (1975). Modality effects in short-term verbal memory. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 68-84. doi: 10. 1037/h0076166.
29. Roediger, H. L., III, Gallo, D. A., & Geraci, L. (2002). Processing approaches to cognition: The impetus from levels of processing framework. Memory, 10, 319-332.
30. Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181-210. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1745-6916. 2006. 00012. x.
31. Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2006. 01693. x.
32. Roediger, H. L., III, Putnam, A. L., & Smith, M. A. (2011). Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education (Vol. 55, pp. 1-36). San Diego, CA: Elsevier/Academic Press.
33. Smith, M. A., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2011). Covert retrieval practice benefits retention as much as overt retrieval practice. Manuscript submitted for publication.
34. Spellman, B. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). When predictions create reality: Judgments of learning may alter what they are intended to assess. Psychological Science, 3, 315-316.
35. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36. Wenger, S. K., Thompson, C. P., & Bartling, C. A. (1980). Recall facilitates subsequent recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 135-144.
37. Wheeler, M. A., & Roediger, H. L., III. (1992). Disparate effects of repeated testing: Reconciling Ballard's (1913) and Bartlett's (1932) results. Psychological Science, 3, 240-245.
38. Whitten, W. B., & Bjork, R. A. (1977). Learning from tests: Effects of spacing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 465-478.
39. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625-636. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196322.