What about excellence in teaching? A benevolent ranking of universities

Scientometrics

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 337-364

  De Witte, Kristof ^a,b   Hudrlikova, Lenka ^c  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Conditional efficiency; Endogenous weight selection; Higher education; University ranking

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879190331     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-0971-2     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Altbach, P. (2006). The dilemmas of ranking. International Higher Education, 42, 2-3.
2. Billaut, J.-C., Bouyssou, D., & Vincke, P. (2010). Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking? Scientometrics, 84(1), 237-263.
3. Boulton, G. (2010) University rankings: Diversity, excellence And the european initiative. League Of European Research Universities. Advice Paper Nr. 3, June 2010.
4. Bowman, N. A., & Bastedo, M. N. (2010). Anchoring effects in world university rankings: Exploring biases in reputation scores. Higher Education, 61(4), 431-444.
5. Cazals, C., Florens, J. P., & Simar, L. (2002). Nonparametric frontier estimation: A robust approach. Journal of Econometrics, 106(1), 1-25.
6. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
7. Cheng, Y., & Liu, N. (2008). Examining major rankings according to the Berlin principles. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2-3), 201-208.
8. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., & van Puyenbroeck, T. (2007). An introduction to 'benefit of the doubt' composite indicators. Social Indicators Research, 82, 111-145.
9. CHERI. (2008). Counting what is measured or measuring what counts? League tables and their impact on higher education institutions in England. Report to HEFCE by the Centre for Higher Education Research and Information (CHERI), Open University, and Hobsons Research, Issues Paper, April 2008/14.
10. Clarke, M. (2007). The impact of higher education rankings on student access, choice, and opportunity. Higher Education in Europe, 32(1), 59-70.
11. Coelli, M. (2009). Tuition fees and equality of university enrolment. Canadian Journal of Economics, 42(3), 1072-1099.
12. Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2005). Introducing Environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: A probabilistic approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 24(1), 93-121.
13. De Witte, K., & Kortelainen, M. (2013). What explains performance of students in a heterogeneous environment? Conditional efficiency estimation with continuous and discrete environmental variables. Applied Economics, 45(17), 2401-2412.
14. De Witte, K., & Rogge, N. (2010). To publish or not to publish? On the aggregation and drivers of research performance. Scientometrics, 85(3), 657-680.
15. De Witte, K., & Rogge, N. (2011). Accounting for exogenous influences in performance evaluations of teachers. Economics of Education Review, 30(4), 641-653.
16. Eccles, C. (2002). The use of university rankings in the United Kingdom. Higher Education in Europe, 27(4), 423-432.
17. Enserink, M. (2007). Who ranks the university rankers? Science, 317, 1026-1028.
18. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253-290.
19. Federkeil, G. (2008). Rankings and quality assurance in higher education. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2-3), 219-223.
20. Griffith, A., & Rask, K. (2007). The influence of the U. S. News and World Report collegiate rankings on the matriculation decision of high-ability students: 1995-2004. Economics of Education Review, 26(2), 1-12.
21. Harvey, L. (2008a). Rankings of higher education institutions: A critical review, editorial. Quality in Higher Education, 14(3), 187-207.
22. Harvey, L. (2008b). Assaying improvement, paper presented at the 30th EAIR Forum, Copenhagen, Denmark, 24-27 August.
23. Hazelkorn, E. (2007). The impact of league tables and ranking systems on higher education decision making. Higher Education Management and Policy, 19, 2.
24. Institute for Higher Education Policy (IHEP). (2007). College and university ranking systems. Global perspectives and American challenges. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
25. International Ranking Expert Group (IREG). (2006). Berlin principles on ranking of higher education institutions. www. che. de/downloads/Berlin_Principles_IREG_534. pdf.
26. JRC/OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Methodology and user guide, OECD Publishing, ISBN 978-92-64-04345-9.
27. Kälvemark, T. (2007). University ranking systems: A critique. Technical report, Irish Universities Quality Board.
28. Marcucci, P. N., & Johnstone, D. B. (2007). Tuition fee policies in a comparative perspective: Theoretical and political rationales. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(1), 25-40.
29. Marginson, S. (2007). Global university rankings: Implications in general and for Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(2), 131-142.
30. Marginson, S., & van der Wende, M. C. (2007). To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education. Journal for Studies in International Education, 11(3-4), 306-329.
31. Melyn, W., & Moesen, W. (1991). Towards a synthetic indicator of macroeconomic performance: Unequal weighting when limited information is available. Public economics research paper, 17, CES, KULeuven.
32. Merisotis, J. P. (2002). On the ranking of higher education institutions. Higher Education in Europe, 27(4), 361-363.
33. Michaelis, P. (2004). Education, research and the impact of tuition fees: A simple model of the Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftswissenschaften/Review of Economics Publication Info, University of Augsburg, Department of Economics, paper 265.
34. Racine, J. S., Hart, J., & Li, Q. (2006). Testing the significance of categorical predictor variables in nonparametric regression models. Econometric Reviews, 25(4), 523-544.
35. Rauhvargers, A. (2011). Global university rankings and their impact. Brussels: EuropeanUniversity Association.
36. Sadlak, J., Merisotis, J., & Li, N. C. (2008). University rankings: Seeking prestige, raising visibility and embedding quality-the editors' views. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2-3), 195-199.
37. Sanoff, A. (1998). Rankings are here to stay: Colleges can improve them. Chronicle of Higher Education, 45(2), 96-100.
38. Sowter, B. (2008). The times higher education supplement and Quacquarelli Symonds (THES-QS) world university rankings: New developments in ranking methodology. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2-3), 345-347.
39. Stella, A., & Woodhouse, D. (2006). Ranking of higher education institutions. Occasional Publications Series No: 6, Melbourne, AUQA.
40. Taylor, P., & Braddock, R. (2007). International university ranking systems and the idea of university excellence. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(3), 245-260.
41. THES. (2005). World university rankings. In Times Higher Education Supplement.
42. Tofallis, C. (2012). A different approach to university rankings. Higher Education, 63(1), 1-18.
43. Tulkens, H. (2007). Ranking universities: How to take better account of diversity. CORE Discussion Paper 2007/42.
44. van der Wende, M. (2008). Rankings and classifications in higher education: A European perspective. Higher Education, 23, 49-71.
45. van der Wende, M., & Westerheijden, D. (2009). Rankings and classifications: The need for a multidimensional approach. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22/3, 71-86.
46. van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133-143.
47. van Vught, F. (2007). Diversity and differentiation in higher education systems. Presentation at the conference higher education in the 21st century-diversity of missions, Dublin, 26 June 2007.
48. van Vught, F. A., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2010). Multidimensional ranking: a new transparency tool for higher education and research. The Netherlands: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS), University of Twente.
49. Weber, L. (2006). University autonomy, a necessary, but not sufficient condition for excellence-being a paper presented at IAU/IAUP Presidents' symposium. Chiang Mai, Thailand, 8-9 December.
50. Webster, J. (2001). A principal component analysis of the U. S. News & World Report tier rankings of colleges and universities. Economics of Education Review, 20, 235-244.
51. Zha, Q. (2009). Diversification or homogenization in higher education: A global allomorphism perspective. Higher Education in Europe, 34(3-4), 459-479.