Tuition fee policies in a comparative perspective: Theoretical and political rationales

Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 25-40

  Marcucci, Pamela N ^a   Johnstone, D Bruce ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947281500     PISSN: 1360080X     EISSN: 14699508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13600800600980015     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Andrews, L. (1999). Does HECS deter? Factors affecting university participation by low SES groups. Adelaide: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Higher Education Division.
2. Bain, O. (2001). The costs of higher education to students and parents in Russia: Tuition policy issues. Peabody Journal of Education, 76, 57-80.
3. Chapman, B., & Ryan, C. (2003). The access implications of income contingent charges for higher education: Lessons from Australia (Discussion Paper No. 463). Canberra: Australian National University, Center for Economic Policy Research.
4. College Board. (2004). Trends in college pricing. New York: College Board.
5. Department of Education and Skills. (2003). The future of higher education. London: DfES.
6. Hebel, S. (2003, December 13). Va. Governor wants to inject college into senior year of high school. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from: http://chronicle.com/
7. Heller, D. (1999). The effects of tuition and state financial aid on public college enrolment. Review of Higher Education, 23(1), 65-89.
8. Ishengoma, J. (2002). Financing higher education in the Federal Republic of Nigeria: Developments and trends. Buffalo, NY: International Comparative Higher Education Finance and Accessibility Project.
9. Johnstone, D. B. (1992). Tuition fees. In B. R. Clark & G. Neave (Eds.), The encyclopedia of higher education, Vol. 2 (pp. 1501-1509). Oxford: Pergamon.
10. Johnstone, D. B. (2004). Cost-sharing and equity in higher education: Implications of income contingent loans. In P. Texteria, B. Jongbloed, D. Dill & A. Amaral (Eds.), Markets in higher education (pp. 37-59). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Johnstone, D. B. (2005). Higher educational accessibility and financial viability: The role of student loans (Prepared for the World Report on Higher Education: The Financing of Universities II International Barcelona Conference on Higher Education, Global University Network for Innovation (GUNI) Barcelona, Spain, May 24-25 and November 28-30, 2005). Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo Center for Comparative and Global Studies in Education.
12. Jongbloed, B. (2005, March). Higher education funding in The Netherlands: Recent Developments. IAU Horizons, World Higher Education News, 11(1), 9.
13. Junor, S., & Usher, A. (2002). The price of knowledge: Access and student finance in Canada. Montreal: Canada Millennium Scholarship Foundation Research Series.
14. Junor, S., & Usher, A. (2004). The price of knowledge 2004: Access and student finance in Canada (Canada Millennium Scholarship Foundation Research Series). Ogdensburg, NY: Renouf.
15. Kiamba, C. (2003, September). The experience of privately sponsored studentship and other income generating activities at the University of Nairobi. Paper prepared for the World Bank Regional Training Conference on Improving Tertiary Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Things that Work, Accra, Ghana.
16. LaRocque, N. (2003a). Who should pay? Tuition fees and tertiary education financing in New Zealand. Wellington, Education Forum.
17. LaRocque, N. (2003b, September 16). Top-up tales. Guardian. Retrived from: http:// education.guardian.co.uk
18. Leidig, M. (2001, March 23). Austrian fee plan gets finishes touches. Times Higher Education Supplement. Retrieved from: http://thes.co.uk/
19. Leslie, L., & Brinkman, P. (1989). The economic value of higher education. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
20. Li, W. (2005, May). Private expenditures, family contributions and financial aid. Need analysis in higher education. Paper presented at the International Conference on Higher Education Finance: Cost, Access and Assistance, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
21. Li, W., & Min, W. (n.d.). Tuition, private demand and higher education expansion in China. Peking: Peking University.
22. Potterton, L. (2001, November 16). Austrians petition for the right to free higher education. Times Higher Education Supplement. Retrieved from: http://thes.co.uk/
23. Saint, W. (2003). Higher education development for Ethiopia: Pursuing the vision. Washington, DC: World Bank.
24. Sully, M. (2000, October 6). Protesters fight plan to levy fees. Times Higher Education Supplement. Retrieved from: http://thes.co.uk/
25. Usher, A., & Cervenam, A. (2005). Global higher education rankings. Affordability and accessibility in comparative perspective. Washington, DC: Educational Policy Institute.
26. Vossensteyn, H. (2000, June). A new look at price responsiveness. Presented at the 13th CHER Annual Conference, Bowness-on-Windemere, UK.
27. Vossensteyn, H. (2005). Perceptions of student price-responsiveness. Enschede: CHEPS/University of Twente.
28. Wachira, K., & Bollag, B. (2002, June 12). A tale of rebirth: Makerere University survived a dictator's reign and is thriving again. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from: http:// chronicle.com/
29. Ward, L. (2005, June 22). No top-up fees for Welsh students. Education Guardian. Retrieved from: http://education.guardian.co.uk
30. Ziegele, F. (2003). Country report: HE finance and cost-sharing in Germany. CHE Center for Higher Education Development.
31. Ziegele, F. (2005, April 21). Scottish MPs agree to top-up fees. Education Guardian. Retrieved from: http://education.guardian.co.uk