A model for haptic aesthetic processing and its implications for design

Proceedings of the IEEE

Volumn 101, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 2123-2133

  Carbon, Claus Christian ^a,b   Jakesch, Martina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; appreciation; art; cognition; cross modal; haptics; liking; perception; pleasure; preferences; sensitivity; tactile

Indexed keywords

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

AESTHETICS; APPRECIATION; COGNITION; CROSS-MODAL; HAPTICS; LIKING; PLEASURE; PREFERENCES; SENSITIVITY; TACTILE;

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING;

EID: 84879184799     PISSN: 00189219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2219831     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. H. Leder and C. C. Carbon, BDimensions in appreciation of car interior design,[ Appl. Cogn. Psychol., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 603-618, 2005. (Pubitemid 41051434)
2. C. C. Carbon, BThe cycle of preference: Long-term dynamics of aesthetic appreciation,[ Acta Psychol., vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 233-244, 2010.
3. K. Grammer and R. Thornhill, BHuman (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness,[ J. Comput. Psychol., vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 233-242, 1994.
4. P. M. A. Desmet and P. Hekkert, BFramework of product experience,[ Int. J. Design, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 57-66, 2007.
5. J. G. Herder, Plastik: einige Wahrnehmungen über Form und Gestalt aus Pygmalions bildendem Traume [Sculpture: Some Observations on Shape and Form from Pygmalion's Creative Dream]. Riga, Latvia: Hartknoch, 1778.
6. M. H. Sonneveld and H. N. J. Schifferstein, BThe tactual experience of objects,[ in Product Experience, H. N. J. Schifferstein and P. Hekkert, Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2008, pp. 41-67.
7. J. E. Workman, BFashion consumer groups, gender, and need for touch,[ Cloth Text Res. J., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 126-139, 2010.
8. J. Peck and T. L. Childers, BIndividual differences in haptic information processing: The FNeed for Touch-scale,[ J. Consum. Res., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 430-442, 2003. (Pubitemid 38118562)
9. J. J. Gibson, BObservations on active touch,[ Psychol. Rev., vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 477-491, 1962.
10. S. J. Lederman and R. L. Klatzky, BHand movements: A window Into haptic object recognition,[ Cogn. Psychol., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 342-368, 1987.
11. R. L. Klatzky, D. Pawluk, and A. Peer, BHaptic perception of material properties and implications for applications,[ Proc. IEEE, to be published.
12. S. J. Lederman and R. L. Klatzky, BHaptic perception: A tutorial,[ Attention Percep. Psychophys., vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 1439-1459, 2009.
13. B. Kolb and I. Q. Whishaw, Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology. San Francisco, CA: Freeman, 2003.
14. M. H. Sonneveld, Aesthetics of Tactile Experiences. Delft, The Netherlands: TU Delft, 2007.
15. M. D. Augustin, J. Wagemans, and C. C. Carbon, BVisual aesthetics: Relevant measures and their dependence on object class,[ Perception, vol. 39, pp. 114-114, 2010.
16. M. D. Augustin, J. Wagemans, and C. C. Carbon, BAll is beautiful? Generality vs. specificity of word usage in visual aesthetics,[ Acta Psychol. (Amst), vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 187-201, 2012.
17. T. Fields, Touch. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.
18. J. G. Apostolopoulos, P. A. Chou, B. Culbertson, T. Kalker, M. D. Trott, and S. Wee, BThe road to immersive communication,[ Proc. IEEE, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 974-990, Apr. 2012.
19. J. Peck and T. L. Childers, BTo have and to hold: The influence of haptic information on product judgments,[ J. Market., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 35-48, 2003. (Pubitemid 36507809)
20. B. Grohmann, E. R. Spangenberg, and D. E. Sprott, BThe influence of tactile input on the evaluation of retail product offerings,[ J. Retail., vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 237-245, 2007.
21. J. Peck and J. Wiggins, BIt just feels good: Customers' affective response to touch and its influence on persuasion,[ J. Market., vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 56-69, 2006. (Pubitemid 44714010)
22. A. Mehrabian, Silent Messages: Implicit Communication of Emotions and Attitudes, 2nd ed. Independence, KY: Wadsworth, 1981.
23. R. Heslin and T. Alper, BTouch: A bonding gesture,[ Nonverbal Interaction, vol. 11, pp. 47-75, 1983.
24. A. V. Citrin, D. E. Stem, E. R. Spangenberg, and M. J. Clark, BConsumer need for tactile input: An internet retailing challenge,[ J. Business Res., vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 915-922, 2003. (Pubitemid 36913810)
25. N. Crilly, J. Moultrie, and P. J. Clarkson, BSeeing things: Consumer response to the visual domain in product design,[ Design Studies, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 547-577, 2004.
26. G. C. Cupchik, BEmotion and industrial design: Reconciling meanings and feelings,[ in Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Design Emotion, C. J. Overbeeke and P. Hekkert, Eds., 1999, pp. 75-82.
27. P. Hekkert and H. N. J. Schifferstein, BIntroducing product experience,[ in Product Experience, H. N. J. Schifferstein and P. Hekkert, Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2008, pp. 3-8.
28. A. Chatterjee, BProspects for a cognitive neuroscience for visual aesthetics,[ Bull. Psychol. Arts, vol. 4,no. 2, pp. 55-60, 2003.
29. H. Leder, B. Belke, A. Oeberst, and M. D. Augustin, BA model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments,[ Brit. J. Psychol., vol. 95, pp. 489-508, 2004.
30. M. Jakesch, M. Zachhuber, H. Leder, M. Spingler, and C. C. Carbon, BScenario-based cross-modal touching: How topVDown processes influence tactile and visual appreciation,[ Perception, vol. 37, no. S, pp. 134-134, 2008.
31. M. Jakesch, M. Zachhuber, H. Leder, M. Spingler, and C. C. Carbon, BScenario-based touching: On the influence of top-down processes on tactile and visual appreciation,[ Res. Eng. Design, vol. 22, pp. 143-152, 2011.
32. R. L. Klatzky and S. J. Lederman, BToward a computational model of constraint-driven exploration and haptic object identification,[ Perception, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 597-621, 1993.
33. S. J. Lederman and R. L. Klatzky, BHand movementsVA window into haptic object recognition,[ Cogn. Psychol., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 342-368, 1987.
34. M. Karlsson and A. V. Velasco, BDesigning for the tactile sense: Investigating the relation between surface properties, perceptions and preferences,[ CoDesign: Int. J. CoCreation Design Arts, vol. 3, no. S1, pp. 123-133, 2007.
35. M. Jakesch, M. Zachhuber, H. Leder, and C. C. Carbon, BDeveloping a reference frame for testing cross-modality effects of vision and touch,[ Perception, vol. 37, pp. 92-92, 2008.
36. G. Ekman, J. Hosman, and B. Lindstrom, BRoughness, Smoothness, and PreferenceVA study of quantitative relations in individual subjects,[ J. Exp. Psychol., vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 18-26, 1965.
37. M. Hilsenrat and M. Reiner, BThe impact of subliminal haptic perception on the preference discrimination of roughness and compliance,[ Brain Res. Bull., vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 267-270, 2011.
38. R. L. Klatzky and J. Peck, BPlease touch: Object properties that invite touch,[ IEEE Trans. Haptics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 139-147, Apr.-Jun. 2012.
39. R. L. Klatzky, S. J. Lederman, and D. E. Matula, BHaptic exploration in the presence of vision,[ J. Exp. Psychol., Human Percep. Performance, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 726-743, 1993.
40. M. Jakesch, M. Zachhuber, H. Leder, M. Spingler, and C. C. Carbon, BScenario-based touching: On the influence of top-down processes on tactile and visual appreciation,[ Res. Eng. Design, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 143-152, 2011.
41. T. W. James, G. K. Humphrey, J. S. Gati, P. Servos, R. S. Menon, and M. A. Goodale, BHaptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas,[ Neuropsychologia, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1706-1714, 2002. (Pubitemid 34462878)
42. S. Ballesteros and J. M. Reales, BVisual and haptic discrimination of symmetry in unfamiliar displays extended in the z-axis,[ Perception, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 315-327, 2004. (Pubitemid 38739778)
43. L. Hofel and T. Jacobsen, BTemporal stability and consistency of aesthetic judgments of beauty of formal graphic patterns,[ Percep. Motor Skills, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 30-32, 2003. (Pubitemid 39109387)
44. T. Jacobsen and L. Hofel, BAesthetic judgments of novel graphic patterns: Analyses of individual judgments,[ Percep. Motor Skills, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 755-766, 2002.
45. P. P. L. Tinio and H. Leder, BJust how stable are stable aesthetic features? Symmetry, complexity, and the jaws of massive familiarization,[ Acta Psychol., vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 241-250, 2009.
46. D. I. Perrett, D. M. Burt, I. S. Penton-Voak, K. J. Lee, D. A. Rowland, and R. Edwards, BSymmetry and human facial attractiveness,[ Evol. Human Behav., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 295-307, 1999.
47. G. Rhodes, F. Proffitt, J. M. Grady, and A. Sumich, BFacial symmetry and the perception of beauty,[ Psychonom. Bull. Rev., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 659-669, 1998.
48. M. Bar and M. Neta, BHumans prefer curved visual objects,[ Psychol. Sci., vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 645-648, 2006. (Pubitemid 44179871)
49. M. Bar and M. Neta, BVisual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdale activation,[ Neuropsychologia, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 2191-2200, 2007. (Pubitemid 46678109)
50. S. S. Dazkir and M. A. Read, BFurniture forms and their influence on our emotional responses toward interior environments,[ Environ. Behav., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 722-734, 2011, DOI: 10.1177/0013916511402063.
51. M. Jakesch and C. C. Carbon, BHumans prefer curved objects on basis of haptic evaluation,[ Perception, vol. 40, no. S, pp. 219-219, 2011.
52. C. C. Carbon, BCognitive mechanisms for explaining dynamics of aesthetic appreciation,[ i-Perception, vol. 2, pp. 708-719, 2011.
53. D. E. Berlyne, BNovelty, complexity, and hedonic value,[ Percep. Psychophys., vol. 8, no. 5A, pp. 279-286, 1970.
54. D. E. Berlyne and W. J. Boudewijns, BHedonic effects of uniformity in variety,[ Can. J. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 195-206, 1971.
55. M. G. Orr and S. Ohlsson, BRelationship between complexity and liking as a function of expertise,[ Music Percep., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 583-611, 2005. (Pubitemid 44857612)
56. P. J. Locher, BAn empirical investigation of the visual rightness theory of picture perception,[ Acta Psychol. (Amst), vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 147-164, 2003. (Pubitemid 37188964)
57. P. M. A. Desmet and P. Hekkert, BFramework of product experiences,[ Int. J. Design, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 57-66, 2007.
58. R. Arnheim, Art and Visual Perception. Los Angeles, CA: Univ. California Press, 1954.
59. K. E. Overvliet, R. T. Krampe, and J. Wagemans, BDo the Gestalt principles of proximity and similarity apply in serial haptic search?[ Perception, vol. 39, pp. 132-132, 2010.
60. C. C. Carbon and H. Leder, BThe Repeated Evaluation Technique (RET). A method to capture dynamic effects of innovativeness and attractiveness,[ Appl. Cogn. Psychol., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 587-601, 2005. (Pubitemid 41051433)
61. P. W. Jordan, BHuman factors for pleasure in product use,[ Appl. Ergonom., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 25-33, 1998. (Pubitemid 27503887)
62. S. J. Faerber, H. Leder, G. Gerger, and C. C. Carbon, BPriming semantic concepts affects the dynamics of aesthetic appreciation,[ Acta Psychol., vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 191-200, 2010.
63. D. E. Berlyne, BFInterest- as a psychological concept,[ Brit. J. Psychol., vol. 39, pp. 184-195, 1949.
64. P. M. A. Desmet, P. Hekkert, and J. J. Jacobs, BWhen a car makes you smile: Development and application of an instrument to measure product emotions,[ Adv. Consum. Res., vol. 27, pp. 111-117, 2000.
65. T. D. Wilson, D. B. Centerbar, D. A. Kermer, and D. T. Gilbert, BThe pleasures of uncertainty: Prolonging positive moods in ways people do not anticipate,[ J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 5-21, 2005. (Pubitemid 40140094)
66. P. Hekkert, D. Snelders, and P. C. W. van Wieringen, BFMost advanced, yet acceptable-: Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design,[ Brit. J. Psychol., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 111-124, 2003. (Pubitemid 37189160)
67. J. Blijlevens, C. C. Carbon, R. Mugge, and J. P. L. Schoormans, BAesthetic appraisal of product designs: Independent effects of typicality and arousal,[ Brit. J. Psychol., vol. 103, pp. 44-57, 2012.
68. D. Marr, Vision: A Computational Investigation Into Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco, CA: Freeman, 1982.
69. B. Belke, H. Leder, G. Harsanyi, and C. C. Carbon, BWhen a Picasso is a FPicasso-: The entry point in the identification of visual art,[ Acta Psychol., vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 191-202, 2010.
70. B. Belke, H. Leder, T. Strobach, and C. C. Carbon, BCognitive fluency: High-level processing dynamics in art appreciation,[ Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 214-222, 2010.
71. R. B. Zajonc, BMere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal,[ Curr. Directions Psychol. Sci., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 224-228, 2001.
72. M. Jakesch and C. C. Carbon, BMere exposure in the domain of haptics,[ PLOSOne, vol. 7, no. 2, e31215, 2012.
73. R. Kreuzbauer and A. J. Malter, BProduct design perception and brand categorization,[ Adv. Consumer Res., vol. 34, pp. 240-246, 2007.
74. M. Otaduy, C. Garre, R. J. Carlos, and M. Lin, BData representations for haptic rendering,[ Proc. IEEE, to be published..
75. S. Choi and K. Kuchenbecker, BTactile rendering: Perception, technology, and applications,[ Proc. IEEE, to be published.
76. F. Asif, J. Vinayakamoorthy, J. Ren, and M. Green, BHaptic controls in cars for making driving more safe,[ in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Biomimet., 2009, vol. 1-4, pp. 2023-2028.
77. M. Mikulincer, BReactance and helplessness following exposure to unsolvable problems: The effects of attributional style,[ J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 679-686, 1998.
78. R. L. Klatzky, S. J. Lederman, and D. E. Matula, BHaptic exploration in the presence of vision,[ J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percep. Performance, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 726-743, 1993.
79. J. Peck and J. W. Johnson, BAutotelic need for touch, haptics, and persuasion: The role of involvement,[ Psychol. Market., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 222-239, 2011.
80. C. Swindells, K. E. MacLean, and K. S. Booth, BDesigning for feel: Contrasts between human and automated parametric capture of knob physics,[ IEEE Trans. Haptics, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 200-211, Oct.-Dec. 2009.
81. W. J. Horrey and C. D. Wickens, BDriving and side task performance: The effects of display clutter, separation, and modality,[ Human Factors, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 611-624, 2004. (Pubitemid 40179359)