Engaging students in peer review: Feedback as learning

Issues in Educational Research

Volumn 23, Issue 2 SPL, 2013, Pages 196-211

  Moore, Catherine ^a   Teather, Susan ^a  

^a EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879039020     PISSN: 03137155     EISSN: 18376290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
2. Bonwell, C. C. & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ERIC Digest. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED340272
3. Boud, D. J. (2012). New conceptions of feedback and how they might be put into practice. Keynote address presented at eAssessment Scotland 2012 Conference, University of Dundee. [verified 23 Jan 2013; PowerPoint slides] http://www.srhe.ac.uk/downloads/events/69_Boud.pdf
4. Boud, D. J. & Molloy, E. (2012). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
5. Boud, D. J. & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679050
6. Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series.
7. Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M. & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449
8. Drury, H., Kay, J. & Losberg, W. (2003). Student satisfaction with groupwork in undergraduate computer science. Australasian Computing Education Conference. http://crpit.com/confpapers/CRPITV20Drury.pdf
9. James, R., Krause, K.-L. & Jennings, C. (2010). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from 1994 to 2009. http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/research/experience/docs/FYE_Report_1994_to_2009.pdf
10. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Li, L., Liu, X. & Steckelberg, A. L. (2009). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525-536. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x
12. Lundstrom, K. & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 1-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
13. Nicol, D. (2009). Transforming assessment and feedback: Enhancing integration and empowerment in the first year. In Quality enhancement themes: The first year experience. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, Mansfield, UK. http://www.reap.ac.uk/reap/public/papers//QAA_DN_Paper_final_08.pdf
14. Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback in mass higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
15. Nicol, D. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
16. Oliver, B. (2011). Assuring graduate outcomes. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. http://www.olt.gov.au/system/files/resources/Assuring%20graduate%20outcomes.%20ALTC%20Good%20practice%20report.%20Oliver%2C%20B%202011.pdf
17. Pearce, J., Mulder, R. & Baik, C. (2009). Involving students in peer review: Case studies and practical strategies for university teaching. University of Melbourne: Victoria. http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/resources_teach/teaching_in_practice/docs/Student_Peer_Review.pdf
18. Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J. & O'Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541007
19. Rust, C., O'Donovan, B. & Price, M. (2006). A social constructivist assessment process model: How the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), 231-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930500063819
20. Van den Berg, B. A. M., Admiraal, W. F. & Pilot, A. (2006). Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 341-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070600680836
21. Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2(2). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=2&n=2