Non-weight-bearing neural control of a powered transfemoral prosthesis

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Hargrove, Levi J ^a,b   Simon, Ann M ^a,b   Lipschutz, Robert ^a,b   Finucane, Suzanne B ^a   Kuiken, Todd A ^a,b,c  

^a REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BIOMECHANICS; DISABLED PERSON; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; KNEE; LIMB PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS; ROBOTICS; WEIGHT BEARING; DEVICES; REHABILITATION;

AMPUTEES; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; ROBOTICS; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84879033016     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-62     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008 89 422 429 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005 18295618 (Pubitemid 351273168)
2. Feasibility of an active control scheme for above knee prostheses. Grimes DL, Flowers WC, Donath M, J Biomech Eng 1977 99 4 215 221 10.1115/1.3426293 (Pubitemid 8564844)
3. A computer controlled knee prosthesis: a preliminary report. Peeraer L, Tilley K, Van der Perre G, J Eng Technol 1988 13 134 135
4. Development of an above-knee prosthesis equipped with a microcomputer-controlled knee joint: first test results. Aeyels B, Peeraer L, Vander Sloten J, Van der Perre G, J Biomed Eng 1992 14 199 202 10.1016/0141-5425(92)90052-M 1588776
5. I. Otto Bock Orthopedic Industry, Manual for the 3c100 Otto Bock C-LEG Germany: Duderstadt 1998
6. OSSUR, RHEO KNEE http://www.ossur.com/pages/12702
7. A clinical comparison of variable-damping and mechanically passive prosthetic knee devices. Johansson JL, Sherrill DM, Riley PO, Bonato P, Herr H, Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005 84 563 575 10.1097/01.phm.0000174665.74933.0b 16034225 (Pubitemid 41026122)
8. A comparison of energy expenditure by a high level trans-femoral amputee using the Intellegent Prosthesis and conventionally damped prosthetic limbs. Taylor MB, Clark E, Offord EA, Baxter C, Prosthet Orthot Int 1996 20 116 121 8876005 (Pubitemid 26267641)
9. Energy expenditure and biomechanical characteristics of lower limb amputee gait: the influence of prosthetic alignment and different prosthetic components. Schmalz T, Blumentritt S, Jarasch R, Gait Posture 2002 16 255 263 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00008-5 12443950 (Pubitemid 35341771)
10. Winter DA, The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly and pathological Kitchner, ON, Canada: Waterloo Biomechanics 2 1991
11. Frontal and sagittal plane analyses of the stair climbing task in healthy adults aged over 40 years: what are the challenges compared to level walking? Nadeau S, McFadyen BJ, Malouin F, Clin Biomech 2003 18 950 959 10.1016/S0268-0033(03)00179-7 (Pubitemid 37324364)
12. Joint powers in stair climbing at different slopes. Reiner R, Rabuffetti M, Frigo C, Proc IEEE Int Conf Eng Med Biol 1999 1 530 (Pubitemid 30522085)
13. Comparison of mechanical energy expenditure of joint moments and muscle forces during human locomotion. Prilutsky BI, Petrova LN, Raitsin LM, J Biomech 1996 29 405 416 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00083-6 8964770 (Pubitemid 26065722)
14. A functional knee brace alters joint torque and power patterns during walking and running. DeVita P, Torry M, Glover KL, Speroni DL, J Biomech 1996 29 583 588 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00115-8 8707784 (Pubitemid 26093283)
15. Comparison of new approaches to estimate mechanical output of individual joints in vertical jumps. Nagano A, Ishige Y, Fukashiro S, J Biomech 1998 31 951 955 10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00094-3 9840762 (Pubitemid 28529572)
16. Multiclass Real-Time Intent Recognition of a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis. Varol HA, Sup F, Goldfarb M, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2010 57 542 551 19846361
17. The SPARKy (Spring Ankle with Regenerative kinetics) project: Choosing a DC motor based actuation method. Holgate MA, Hitt JK, Bellman RD, Sugar TG, Hollander KW, Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2008. BioRob 2008 Scottsdale, AZ, USA: 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference 2008 163 168
18. Design of an agonist-antagonist active knee prosthesis, in Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. Martinez-Villalpando EC, Weber J, Elliott G, Herr H, BioRob 2008 Scottsdale, AZ, USA: 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference 2008 529 534
19. OSSUR, The POWER KNEE The POWER KNEE. http://www.ossur.com/?PageID=14255
20. Development of EMG-based mode and intent recognition algorithms for a computer-controlled above-knee prosthesis. Peeraer L, Aeyels B, Van der Perre G, J Biomed Eng 1990 12 178 182 10.1016/0141-5425(90)90037-N 2348704 (Pubitemid 20141164)
21. Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits. Au S, Berniker M, Herr H, Neural Netw 2008 21 654 666 10.1016/j.neunet.2008.03.006 18499394
22. Volitional Control of a Prosthetic Knee Using Surface Electromyography. Ha K, Varo HA, Goldfarb M, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011 58 144 151 20805047
23. Terrain Identification for Prosthetic Knees Based on Electromyographic Signal Features. Jin D, Yang J, Zhang R, Wang R, Zhang J, Tsinghua Sci Tech 2006 11 74 79 10.1016/S1007-0214(06)70157-2 (Pubitemid 44189129)
24. A Strategy for Identifying Locomotion Modes using Surface Electromyography. Huang H, Kuiken T, Lipschutz R, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2009 56 65 73 19224720
25. «Continuous Locomotion-Mode Identification for Prosthetic Legs Based on Neuromuscular Mechanical Fusion,» Biomedical Engineering. Huang H, Zhang F, Hargrove LJ, Zhi D, Rogers DR, Englehart KB, IEEE Transactions 2011 58 2867 2875
26. Real-Time Myoelectric Control of Knee and Ankle Motions for Transfemoral Amputees. Hargrove L, Simon A, Lipschutz R, Finucane S, Kuiken T, JAMA 2011 305 1442 1444
27. Dyck WR, Onyshko S, Hobson DA, Winter DA, Quanbury AO, A voluntarily controlled electrohydraulic above-knee prosthesis Spring Bull Prosthet Res. 1975 169 186
28. Myoelectric Pattern Recognition for Use in the Volitional Control of Above-Knee Prostheses. Myers D, Moskowitz GD, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1981 11 296 302
29. Hillstrom H, Moskowitz GD, Robust Intent Recognition for Prosthesis Control Paris, France: 14th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 1992 1448 1449
30. Delis A, Carvalho J, Nascimento, Borges G, Myoelectric Knee Angle Estimation Algorithms for Control of Active Transfemoral Leg Prostheses InTech 2011
31. Losier Y, Wilson A, Moving Towards an Open Standard: The UNB Prosthetic Device Communication Protoco Leipzig, Germany: International Society for Prosthetics & Orthotics (ISPO) World Congress 2010
32. Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. Kuiken TA, Li G, Lock BA, Lipschutz RD, Miller LA, Stubblefield KA, Englehart KB, JAMA 2009 301 619 628 10.1001/jama.2009.116 19211469
33. A Comparison of Surface and Intramuscular Myoelectric Signal Classification. Hargrove L, Englehart K, Hudgins B, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007 54 847 853 17518281 (Pubitemid 46628567)
34. Design and control of a powered transfemoral prosthesis. Sup F, Bohara A, Goldfarb M, Int J Robotics Res 2008 27 263 273 10.1177/0278364907084588 (Pubitemid 351169719)
35. Quantifying pattern recognition-based myoelectric control of multifunctional transradial prostheses. Li G, Schultz AE, Kuiken TA, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2010 18 185 192 20071269
36. Quantification of feature space changes with experience during electromyogram pattern recognition control. Bunderson N, Kuiken T, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2012 20 239 246 22262686
37. Patient Training for Functional Use of Pattern Recognition-Controlled Prostheses. Simon A, Lock BA, Stubblefield K, J Prosthet Orthot 2012 24 56 64 10.1097/JPO.0b013e3182515437 22563231
38. The Effect of ECG Interference on Pattern Recognition Based Myoelectric Control For Targeted Muscle Reinnervated Patients. Hargrove L, Zhou P, Englehart K, Kuiken T, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2009 56 2197 2201 19692302
39. A training strategy to reduce classification degradation due to electrode displacements in pattern recognition based myoelectric control. Hargrove L, Englehart K, Hudgins B, Biomed Signal Process Control 2008 3 175 180 10.1016/j.bspc.2007.11.005
40. Scheme E, Fougner A, Stavdahl O, Chan A, Englehart K, Examining the adverse effects of limb position on pattern recognition based myoelectric control Buenos Aires, Argentina: 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2010
41. Improving Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Robustness to Electrode Shift by Changing Interelectrode Distance and Electrode Configuration. Young A, Hargrove L, Kuiken T, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012 59 645 652 22147289
42. A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control. Hudgins B, Parker P, Scot RN, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1993 40 82 94 10.1109/10.204774 8468080 (Pubitemid 24060692) Center