Aortic annulus measurement and relevance to successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A new technique using 3D TEE

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 302-309

  Pershad, Ashish ^a   Stone, Diana ^b   Morris, Michael F ^a   Fang, Kenith ^a   Gellert, George ^a  

^a BANNER GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Heart and Vascular Center of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; AORTA ANNULUS; AORTA ROOT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCEDURES; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SYSTOLE; THREE DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION;

AORTIC VALVE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS;

EID: 84879012206     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: 15408183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joic.12033     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hutter A, Opitz A, Bleiziffer S, et al. Aortic annulus evaluation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Cath Cardiovasc Inter 2010; 76: 1009-1019.
2. Ewe SH, Klautz RJ, Schalij M, et al. Role of computed tomography imaging for transcatheter valvular repair/insertion. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 27: 1179-1193.
3. Jilaihawi H, Kashif M, Fontana G, et al. Cross-sectional computed tomographic assessment improves accuracy of aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and reduces the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 1275-1286.
4. Gurvitch R, Wood DA, Leipsic J, et al. Multislice computed tomography for prediction of optimal angiographic deployment projections during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 1157-1165.
5. Leipsic J, Wood D, Manders D, et al. The evolving role of MDCT in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A radiologists' perspective. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: W214-W219.
6. Chen JJ, Manning MA, Frazier A, et al. CT angiography of the cardiac valves: Normal, diseased, and postoperative appearances. Radiographics 2009; 29: 1393-1412.
7. Bertaso AG, Wong DT, Liew GY, et al. Aortic annulus dimension assessment by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Differences between systole and diastole. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 28 (8): 2091-2098.
8. Leipsic J, Gurvitch R, Labounty TM, et al. Multidetector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4: 416-429.
9. Gurvitch R, Webb JG, Yuan R, et al. Aortic annulus diameter determination by multidetector computed tomography: Reproducibility, applicability, and implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 1235-1245.
10. Rajani R, Kakad M, Khwaja MZ, et al. Paravalvular regurgitation 1 year transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 868-872.
11. Kempfert J, Van Linden A, Lehmkuhl L, et al. Aortic annulus sizing: Echocardiographic versus CT derived measurements in comparison with direct aortic sizing. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 2012; 42 (4): 627-633.
12. Tzikas A, Schultz C, Piazza N, et al. Assessment of the aortic annulus by MSCT, contrast aortography and TTE in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Cath Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 77: 868-875.
13. Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty J, Brochet E, et al. Multimodal assessment of the aortic annulus diameter. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 186-194.
14. Janosi R, Kahlert P, Plicht B, et al. Measurement of the aortic annulus size by real time 3D TEE. Minim Invasive Ther 2011; 20: 85-94.
15. Husser O, Rauch S, Endemann D, et al. Impact of 3D TEE on prosthesis sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Cath Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 80 (6): 956-963.
16. Ng ACT, Delgado V, van der Kley., Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2- and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3: 94-102.
17. Abdel-Wahab M, Zahn R, Horack M, et al. German transcatheter aortic valve interventions registry investigators. Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Incidence and early outcome. Heart 2011; 97: 899-906.
18. Santos N, deAugustin J, Almeria C, et al. Prosthesis/annular discongruence assessed by 3D TEE: A predictor of significant paravalvular aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 13 (11): 931-937.
19. Detaint D, Lepage L, Himbert D, et al. Determinants of significant paravalvular regurgitation after TAVI. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2009; 2: 821-827.
20. Buzzatti N, Maisano F, Latib A, et al. CT based evaluation of aortic annulus, prosthesis size and impact on early residual aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 43 (1): 43-50.