Role of computed tomography imaging for transcatheter valvular repair/insertion

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1179-1193

  Ewe, See Hooi ^a   Klautz, Robert J ^a   Schalij, Martin J ^a   Delgado, Victoria ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Imaging; Transcatheter heart valve implantation

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANNULOPLASTY; AORTA STENOSIS; ARTERY CALCIFICATION; ARTICLE; CLIP; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HEART FUNCTION; HEART VALVE PROLAPSE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; MITRAL VALVE REPAIR; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT PLANNING;

AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MITRAL VALVE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 83955161782     PISSN: 15695794     EISSN: 15730743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9830-5     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Leon M, Smith C, Mack M et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363:1597-1607
2. Mauri L, Garg P, Massaro JM et al (2010) The EVEREST II trial: Design and rationale for a randomized study of the evalve mitraclip system compared with mitral valve surgery for mitral regurgitation. Am Heart J 160:23-29
3. Coeytaux RR, Williams JW, Gray RN et al (2010) Percutaneous heart valve replacement for aortic stenosis: State of the evidence. Ann Intern Med 153:314-324
4. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K et al (2008) Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:e1-e142
5. Chiam PTL, Chao VTT, Tan SY et al (2010) Percutaneous transcatheter heart valve implantation in a bicuspid aortic valve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:559-561
6. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Al-Attar N et al (2008) Transcatheter valve implantation for patients with aortic stenosis: A position statement from the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the EuropeanSociety of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 29:1463-1470 (Pubitemid 351806497)
7. Zegdi R, Lecuyer L, Achouh P et al (2010) Increased radial force improves stent deployment in tricuspid but not in bicuspid stenotic native aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg 89:768-772
8. Tanaka R, Yoshioka K, Niinuma H et al (2010) Diagnostic value of vardiac CT in the evaluation of bicuspid aortic stenosis: Comparison with echocardiography and operative findings. Am J Roentgenol 195:895-899
9. Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Trindade PT et al (2010) Cardiac CT for the differentiation of bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves: Comparison with echocardiography and surgery. Am J Roentgenol 195:900-908
10. Delgado V, Ng ACT, Van de Veire NR et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Role of multidetector row computed tomography to evaluate prosthesis positioning and deployment in relation to valve function. Eur Heart J 31:1114-1123
11. John D, Buellesfeld L, Yuecel S et al (2010) Correlation of device landing zone calcification and acute procedural success in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantations with the self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:233-243
12. Koos R, Mahnken AH, Dohmen G et al (2010) Association of aortic valve calcification severity with the degree of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol (in press
13. Zegdi R, Ciobotaru V, Noghin M et al (2008) Is it reasonable to treat all calcified stenotic aortic valves with a valved stent? Results from a human anatomic study in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:579-584
14. Webb JG, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR et al (2006) Percutaneous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral artery. Circulation 113:842-850
15. Kapadia SR, Schoenhagen P, Stewart W et al (2010) Imaging for transcatheter valve procedures. Curr Probl Cardiol 35:228-276
16. Cueff C, Serfaty JM, Cimadevilla C et al (2010) Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: Correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction. Heart (in press
17. Messika-Zeitoun D, Aubry MC, Detaint D et al (2004) Evaluation and clinical implications of aortic valve calcification measured by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation 110:356-362 (Pubitemid 38955506)
18. Delgado V, Ewe S, Ng A et al (2010) Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Key steps to assess procedural feasibility. EuroIntervention 6:643-652
19. Piazza N, De Jaegere P, Schultz C et al (2008) Anatomy of the aortic valvar complex and its implications for transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 1:74-81
20. Ng ACT, Delgado V, van der Kley F et al (2010) Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2- and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3:94-102
21. Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V et al (2008) Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography: Implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1:321-330 (Pubitemid 351681425)
22. Smid M, Ferda J, Baxa J et al (2010) Aortic annulus and ascending aorta: Comparison of preoperative and periooperative measurement in patients with aortic stenosis. Eur J Radiol 74:152-155
23. Schultz C, Moelker A, Tzikas A et al (2010) Cardiac CT: Necessary for precise sizing for transcatheter aortic implantation. EuroIntervention 6(Suppl G):G6-G13
24. Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, Schoenhagen P (2010) Multimodality quantitative imaging of aortic root for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: More complex than it appears. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:195-197
25. Schultz CJ, Moelker A, Piazza N et al (2010) Three dimensional evaluation of the aortic annulus using multislice computer tomography: Are manufacturer's guidelines for sizing for percutaneous aortic valve replacement helpful? Eur Heart J 31:849-856
26. Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty JM, Brochet E et al (2010) Multimodal assessment of the aortic annulus diameter: Implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:186-194
27. Webb J, Cribier A (2010) Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve implantation: What do we know? Eur Heart J (in press
28. Webb JG, Altwegg L, Masson JB et al (2009) A new transcatheter aortic valve and percutaneous valve delivery system. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:1855-1858
29. Thomas M, Schymik G, Walther T et al (2010) Thirty-day results of the SAPIEN aortic bioprosthesis European outcome (SOURCE) registry. A European registry of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN valve. Circulation 122:62-69
30. Kurra V, Schoenhagen P, Roselli EE et al (2009) Prevalence of significant peripheral artery disease in patients evaluated for percutaneous aortic valve insertion: Preprocedural assessment with multidetector computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:1258-1264
31. Ammar R, Porat E, Eisenberg DS et al (1998) Utility of spiral CT in minimally invasive approach for aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 14:S130-S133 (Pubitemid 28480270)
32. Gurvitch R, Wood DA, Leipsic J et al (2010) Multislice computed tomography for prediction of optimal angiographic deployment projections during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:1157-1165
33. Kurra V, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM et al (2010) Pre-procedural imaging of aortic root orientation and dimensions: Comparison between X-ray angiographic planar imaging and 3-dimensional multidetector row computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:105-113
34. Tzikas A, Schultz C, Van Mieghem N et al (2010) Optimal projection estimation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation based on contrast-aortography: Validation of a prototype software. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76:602-607
35. Falk V, Walther T, Schwammenthal E et al (2010) Transapical aortic valve implantation with a self-expanding anatomically oriented valve. Eur Heart J (in press
36. Chow BJW, Abraham A, Wells GA et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy and impact of computed tomographic coronaryangiography on utilization of invasive coronary angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2:16-23
37. Detaint D, Sundt TM, Nkomo VT et al (2006) Surgical correction of mitral regurgitation in the elderly: Outcomes and recent improvements. Circulation 114:265-272 (Pubitemid 44297092)
38. Mirabel M, Iung B, Baron G et al (2007) What are the characteristics of patients with severe, symptomatic, mitral regurgitation who are denied surgery? Eur Heart J 28: 1358-1365 (Pubitemid 47355974)
39. Cleland JGF, Coletta AP, Buga L et al (2010) Clinical trials update from the American College of Cardiology meeting 2010: DOSE, ASPIRE, CONNECT, STICH, STOP-AF, CABANA, RACE II, EVEREST II, ACCORD, and NAVIGATOR. Eur J Heart Fail 12:623-629
40. Sack S, Kahlert P, Bilodeau L et al (2009) Percutaneous transvenous mitral annuloplasty. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:277-284
41. Siminiak T, Hoppe UC, Schofer J et al (2009) Effectiveness and safety of percutaneous coronary sinus-based mitral valve repair in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (from the AMADEUS Trial). Am J Cardiol 104: 565-570
42. Schofer J, Siminiak T, Haude M et al (2009) Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty for functional mitral regurgitation: Results of the CARILLON mitral annuloplasty device European Union study. Circulation 120:326-333
43. Grossi EA, Patel N, Woo YJ et al (2010) Outcomes of the RESTOR-MV trial (Randomized Evaluation of a Surgical Treatment for Off-pump Repair of the Mitral Valve). J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1984-1993
44. Feuchtner GM, Alkadhi H, Karlo C et al (2010) Cardiac CT angiography for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse: Comparison with echocardiography. Radiology 254:374-383
45. Delgado V, Tops LF, Schuijf JD et al (2009) Assessment of mitral valve anatomy and geometry with multislice computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:556-565
46. Gopal A, Shah A, Shareghi S et al (2011) The role of cardiovascular computed tomographic angiography for coronary sinus mitral annuloplasty. J Invasive Cardiol 22:67-73
47. Tops LF, Van de Veire NR, Schuijf JD et al (2007) Noninvasive evaluation of coronary sinus anatomy and its relation to the mitral valve annulus: Implications for percutaneous mitral annuloplasty. Circulation 115:1426-1432 (Pubitemid 46648378)
48. Choure AJ, Garcia MJ, Hesse B et al (2006) In vivo analysis of the anatomical relationship of coronary sinus to mitral annulus and left circumflex coronary artery using cardiac multidetector computed tomography: Implications for percutaneous coronary sinus mitral annuloplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1938-1945 (Pubitemid 44755342)
49. Chiribiri A, Kelle S, Kohler U et al (2008) Magnetic resonance cardiac vein imaging: Relation to mitral valve annulus and left circumflex coronary artery. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1:729-738
50. Mishra YK, Mittal S, Jaguri P et al (2006) Coapsys mitral annuloplasty for chronic functional ischemic mitral regurgitation: 1-year results. Ann Thorac Surg 81:42-46 (Pubitemid 41815369)
51. Palazzuoli A, Cademartiri F, Geleijnse ML et al (2010) Left ventricular remodelling and systolic function measurement with 64 multi-slice computed tomography versus second harmonic echocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease: A double blind study. Eur J Radiol 73:82-88