Antirotation proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research

Volumn 99, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 377-383

  Shen, L ^a   Zhang, Y ^a   Shen, Y ^a   Cui, Z ^b  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^b NANTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Dynamic hip screw; Meta analysis; Peritrochanteric fractures; Proximal femoral nail antirotation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DYNAMIC HIP SCREW PLATE; FEMUR INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; FEMUR PERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL ANTIROTATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

BONE NAILS; BONE SCREWS; FRACTURE FIXATION, INTERNAL; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; ROTATION;

EID: 84878973027     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18770568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.019     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Butler M., Forte M.L., Joglekar S.B., Swiontkowski M.F., Kane R.L. Evidence summary: systematic review of surgical treatments for geriatric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93:1104-1115.
2. Parker M.J., Handoll H.H. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010, 9:CD000093. 10.1002/14651858.
3. Haidukewych G.J. Intertrochanteric fractures: ten tips to improve results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91:712-719.
4. Kaplan K., Miyamoto R., Levine B.R., Egol K.A., Zuckerman J.D. Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. II: intertrochanteric fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008, 16:665-673.
5. Simmermacher R.K., Ljungqvist J., Bail H., Hockertz T., Vochteloo A.J., Ochs U., et al. The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily practice: results of a multicentre clinical study. Injury 2008, 39:932-939.
6. Mereddy P., Kamath S., Ramakrishnan M., Malik H., Donnachie N. The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): a new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury 2009, 40:428-432.
7. Liu Y., Tao R., Liu F., Wang Y., Zhou Z., Cao Y., et al. Mid-term outcomes after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric femoral fractures using the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). Injury 2010, 41:810-817.
8. Zou J., Xu Y., Yang H. A comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation and dynamic hip screw devices in trochanteric fractures. J Int Med Res 2009, 37:1057-1064.
9. Xu Y.Z., Geng D.C., Mao H.Q., Zhu X.S., Yang H.L. A comparison of the proximal femoral nail antirotation device and dynamic hip screw in the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric fracture. J Int Med Res 2010, 38:1266-1275.
10. Garg B., Marimuthu K., Kumar V., Malhotra R., Kotwal P.P. Outcome of short proximal femoral nail antirotation and dynamic hip screw for fixation of unstable trochanteric fractures. A randomised prospective comparative trial. Hip Int 2011, 21:531-536.
11. Jadad A.R., Moore R.A., Carroll D., Jenkinson C., Reynolds D.J., Gavaghan D.J., et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials 1996, 17:1-12.
12. Cochran W.G. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 1954, 10:101-129.
13. Higgins J.P., Thompson S.G., Deeks J.J., Altman D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003, 327:557-560.
14. Mantel N., Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959, 22:719-748.
15. DerSimonian R., Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986, 7:177-188.
16. Tobias A. Assessing the influence of a single study in the meta-analysis estimate. Stata Tech Bull 1999, 8:15-17.
17. Stuck A.E., Rubenstein L.Z., Wieland D. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Asymmetry detected in funnel plot was probably due to true heterogeneity. BMJ 1998, 316:469.
18. Wang W.Y., Liu L., Wang G.L., Fang Y., Yang T.F. Ipsilateral basicervical femoral neck and shaft fractures treated with long proximal femoral nail antirotation or various plate combinations: comparative study. J Orthop Sci 2010, 15:323-330.
19. Kristek D., Lovric I., Kristek J., Biljan M., Kristek G., Sakic K. The proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. Coll Antropol 2010, 34:937-940.
20. Huang J., Ji F., Cai L., Cai X.B., Fu Q.G. DHS-Gamma nail and PFNA in treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly: a retrospective study. Acad J Second Mi Med Univ 2008, 29:1260-1265. http://www.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?QueryID=0&CurRec=1&DbCode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFD0608&filename=DEJD200810038&urlid=&yx=.
21. Peng W., Ma Z.Y., Chang Q., Wang L., Yu F.Y. Analysis of the treatment of osteoporoflc femoral intertrochanteric fracture in senile with dynamic hip screwand proximal femoral nail anlirotafion. Zhongguo Gu Zhi Shu Song Za Zhi 2009, 15:815-829. http://www.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?QueryID=5&CurRec=1&DbCode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFDLAST2012&filename=ZGZS200911009&urlid=&yx=.
22. Xu M.Z., Yang M.L., Huang C., Zuo R.J. Proximal femoral nail antirotation and dynamic hip screw in the treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture: a contrast study. J Clin Orthop 2011, 14:135-137. http://www.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?QueryID=10&CurRec=1&DbCode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFDLAST2011&filename=LCGK201102008&urlid=&yx=.
23. Zeng Z.X., Chen Z.X., Qiu J.Q. Comparison of clinical effects of different fixations on femoral intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. J Clin Orthop 2011, 14:302-305. http://www.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?QueryID=17&CurRec=1&DbCode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFDLAST2011&filename=LCGK201103029&urlid=&yx=.
24. Zheng C., Wu J., Wang Q., Yu P.F., Fan H.H., Li S.L. Three kinds of internal fixation for intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly. Chin J Mult Organ Dis Elder 2009, 8:230-235. http://www.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?QueryID=24&CurRec=1&DbCode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFD0911&filename=ZLQG200903012&urlid=&yx=.
25. Zheng H.G., Tang H., Zhang Q.L. A comparative study of dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail antirotation in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Orthop J China 2009, 17:407-412. http://www.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?QueryID=31&CurRec=1&DbCode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFD0911&filename=ZJXS200906009&urlid=&yx=.
26. Zheng J., Ma L.W., Cao L. Comparative study on the clinicaI effect of DHS/PFNA for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. J Qiqihar Med Coll 2010, 31:3712-3716. http://www.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?QueryID=38&CurRec=1&DbCode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFDLAST2011&filename=QQHB201023011&urlid=&yx=.
27. Stern R., Lubbeke A., Suva D., Miozzari H., Hoffmeyer P. Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures. Int Orthop 2011, 35:1855-1861.
28. Wang X.B., Xu Y.Z., Geng D.C., Zhu G.M. Comparison of therapeutic effect of PFNA with DHS for intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Suzhou Univ J Med Sci 2010, 30:639-641. http://www.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?QueryID=45&CurRec=1&DbCode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFDLAST2010&filename=SYXU201003066&urlid=&yx=.
29. Zuo W.S., Dai Z.T., Qian J.W. Comparison of therapeutic effect of PFNA with DHS in intertrochanteric fractures. Chin J Mod Med 2011, 21:475-478. http://www.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?QueryID=52&CurRec=1&DbCode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFDLAST2011&filename=ZXDY201104026&urlid=&yx=.
30. Foulongne E., Gilleron M., Roussignol X., Lenoble E., Dujardin F. Mini-invasive nail versus DHS to fix pertrochanteric fractures: a case-control study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009, 95:592-598.
31. Soucanye de Landevoisin E., Bertani A., Candoni P., Charpail C., Demortiere E. Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFN-ATM) fixation of extra-capsular proximal femoral fractures in the elderly: retrospective study in 102 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012, 98:288-295.
32. Simmonds M.C., Higgins J.P., Stewart L.A., Tierney J.F., Clarke M.J., Thompson S.G. Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice. Clin Trials 2005, 2:209-217.
33. Cheng T., Zhang G., Zhang X. Review: Minimally invasive versus conventional dynamic hip screw fixation in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Innov 2011, 18:99-105.
34. Bhandari M., Schemitsch E., Jonsson A., Zlowodzki M., Haidukewych G.J. Gamma nails revisited: gamma nails versus compression hip screws in the management of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 2009, 23:460-464.
35. Liu M., Yang Z., Pei F., Huang F., Chen S., Xiang Z. A meta-analysis of the Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw in treating peritrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop 2010, 34:323-328.
36. Jiang S.D., Jiang L.S., Zhao C.Q., Dai L.Y. No advantages of Gamma nail over sliding hip screw in the management of peritrochanteric hip fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Disabil Rehabil 2008, 30:493-497.
37. Li T., Puhan M.A., Vedula S.S., Singh S., Dickersin K. Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed. BMC Med 2011, 9:79.