Finding and Evaluating Evidence: Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Practice

Finding and Evaluating Evidence: Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-112

  Bronson, Denise E ^a   Davis, Tamara S ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

effectiveness; efficacy; evidence based practice; meta analysis; qualitative research synthesis; quantitative research synthesis; systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878931377     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195337365.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (139)

1. Altman, D. G. (2001). Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables. In M. Egger, S. G. Smith, & D. G. Altman (Eds.), Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context (pp. 228-247). London: BMJ Publishing.
2. American Psychological Association. (2002). Criteria for evaluating treatment guidelines. American Psychologist, 57, 1052-1059.
3. American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
4. Anastas, J. W. (2004). Quality in qualitative evaluation: Issues and possible answers. Research on Social Work Practice, 14, 57-65.
5. Armelius B-Å, & Andresassen, T. H. (2007). Cognitive-behavioral treatment for antisocial behavior in youth in residential treatment. Campbell Systematic Reviews 2007:8. DOI: 10.4073/csr.2007.8
6. Attree, P., & Milton, B. (2006). Critically appraising qualitative research for systematic reviews: Defusing the methodological cluster bombs. Evidence & Policy, 2, 109-126.
7. Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research:A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322, 1115-1117.
8. Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(59). DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
9. Bates, S., & Coren, E. (2006). Campbell Systematic Review 2005. London:Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE).
10. Berterö, C., & Chamberlain Wilmoth, M. (2007). Breast cancer diagnosis and its treatment affecting the self: A meta-synthesis. Cancer Nursing, 30, 194-202.
11. Blythe, B., Tripodi, T., & Briar, S. (1994). Direct Practice Research in Human Services Agencies. New York: Columbia University Press.
12. Booth, A., & Fry-Smith, A. (2004). Developing the research question. Etext on Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Information Resource. Online at http://www.nlm.nih.gov/archive//2060905/nichsr/ehta/chapter2.html.
13. Brekke, J. S., Ell, K., & Palinkas, L. A. (2007). Translational research at the National Institute of Mental Health: Can social work take its rightful place? Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 123-133. DOI:10.1177/1049731506293693
14. Bronson, D. E. (2000). Progress and problems in social work research and evaluation in the United States. Journal of Social Work Research and Evaluation: An International Publication, 1(2), 125-137.
15. Bronson, D. E. (2006). Evidence-based practice: Identifying and removing barriers to implementation. APSAC Advisor, 18(1), 2-6.
16. Bronson, D. E. (2008). Critically appraising studies for evidence-based practice. In A. Roberts (Ed.), Social Workers' Desk Reference (2nd ed., pp. 1137-1141). New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Bronson, D. E., & Harold, R. D. (2009). Systematic reviews and doctoral dissertations: Setting the standard. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, San Antonio, TX, October 2009.
18. Bronson, D. E., Saunders, S., Holt, M. B., & Beck, E. (2008). A Systematic Review of Strategies to Promote Successful Reunification and to Reduce Reentry to Care for Abused, Neglected, and Unruly Children. Columbus, OH:Ohio Department of Jobs and Family Services.
19. Campbell Collaboration. (2001). Guidelines for the preparation of review protocols. Retrieved from http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/artman2/uploads/1/C2_Protocols_guidelines.pdf.
20. Campbell Collaboration. (2008). Steps in proposing, preparing, submitting, and editing of Campbell Collaboration Systematic Reviews. Retrieved from http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/artman2/uploads/1/Review_Steps.pdf.
21. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasiexperimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
22. Centre on Reviews and Dissemination. (2009). Systematic Reviews:CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. York, UK: CRD, York University. Retrieved from http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/pdf/Systematic_Reviews.pdf.
23. Chalmers, I. (2005). If evidence-informed policy works in practice, does it matter it it doesn't work in theory? Evidence & Policy, 1(2), 227-242.
24. Clapton, J., Rutter, D., & Sharif, N. (2009). SCIE systematic mapping guidance. Available at http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/researchresources/rr03.pdf.
25. Cochrane, A. (1972). Effectiveness and Efficiency. Random Reflections on Health Services. London: Nuffield.
26. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
27. Cook, T. D., Shadish, W. R., & Wong, V. C. (2008). Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings for within-study comparisons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 724-750.
28. Cooper, H. (2010). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
29. Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2009). The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
30. Deeks, J. J. (2001). Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In M. Egger, S. G. Smith, & D. G. Altman (Eds.), Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in context (pp. 248-282). London: BMJ Publishing.
31. Deeks, J. J., Altman, D. G., & Bradburn, M. J. (2001). Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In M. Egger, G. D. Smith, & D. G. Altman (Eds.), Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context (2nd ed. pp. 313-335). London: BMJ Publishing.
32. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1998). Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
33. Detsky, A. S., Naylor, C. D., O'Rourke, K., McGeer, A. J., & L'Abbe, K. A. (1992). Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45, 255-265.
34. Dickersin, K. (2005). Publication bias: Recognizing the problem, understanding its origins and scope, and preventing harm. In H. R. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis:Prevention, Assessment, and Adjustments (pp. 11-34). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
35. Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research Policy, 10(1), 45-53.
36. Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., et al. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 27-44.
37. Dixon-Woods, M., Sutton, A., Shaw, R., Miller, T., Smith, J., Young, B., et al. (2007). Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: A quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. Journal of Health Services Research Policy, 12(1), 42-47.
38. Egger, M., Dickersin, K., & Smith, G. D. (2001). Problems and limitations in conducting systematic reviews. In M. Egger, G. D. Smith, & D. G. Altman (Eds.), Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context (2nd ed., pp. 43-68). London: BMJ Publishing Group.
39. Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (2001). Principles of and procedures for systematic reviews. In M. Egger, G. D. Smith, & D. G. Altman (Eds.), Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context (2nd ed., pp. 23-42). London: BMJ Publishing.
40. Egger, M., Smith, G. D., & Altman, D. G. (Eds.). (2001). Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context (2nd ed.). London: BMJ Publishing.
41. Egger, M., Smith, G. D., & O'Rourke, K. (2001). Rationale, potentials, and promise of systematic reviews. In M. Egger, G. D. Smith, & D. G. Altman (Eds.), Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context (2nd ed., pp. 3-19). London: BMJ Publishing.
42. Egger, M., Smith, G. D., & Schneider, M. (2001). Systematic reviews of observational studies. In M. Egger, S. G. Smith, & D.G. Altman (Eds.), Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in context (pp. 211-227). London: BMJ Publishing.
43. EPPI-Centre. (2006a). What is a Systematic Review? Retrieved 11/1/2010 from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=67.
44. EPPI-Centre. (2006b). Assuring quality in systematic reviews. Retrieved 11/1/2010 from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=1917.
45. EPPI-Centre. (2006c). User involvement. Retrieved 11/1/2010 from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=169.
46. EPPI-Centre (2006d). Mapping and refining the review's scope. Retrieved 11/1/2010 from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=175&language=en-US.
47. EPPI-Centre. (March 2007). EPPI-Centre Methods for Conducting Systematic Reviews. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
48. Epstein, W. M. (1990). Conformational response bias among social work journals. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 15, 9-37.
49. Gambrill, E. (2006). Evidence-based practice and policy: Choices ahead. Research on Social Work Practice, 16(3), 338-357.
50. Gambrill, E. (2007). Transparency as the route to evidence-informed professional education. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 553-560. DOI:10.1177/1049731507300149.
51. Gambrill, E., & Gibbs, L. E. (2008). Developing well-structured questions for evidence-informed practice. In A. R. Roberts (Ed.), Social Workers Desk Reference (2nd ed., pp. 1120-1126). New York: Oxford University Press.
52. Gibbs, L. E. (1991). Scientific Reasoning for Social Workers: Bridging the Gap between Research and Practice. New York: Merrill.
53. Gibbs, L. E. (2003). Evidence-Based Practice for the Helping Professions. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning.
54. Gibbs, L. E., & Gambrill, E. (2002). Evidence-based practice:Counterarguments to objections. Research on Social Work Practice, 12(3), 452-476.
55. Gilovich, T. (1991). How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life. New York: The Free Press.
56. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8.
57. Gomersall, A. (2005). Finding the evidence: Looking further afield. Evidence and Policy, 1(2), 269-275.
58. Grayson, L., & Gomersall, A. (2003). A Difficult Business: Finding the Evidence for Social Science Reviews. London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice.
59. Hammerstrøm, K., Wade, A., & Jørgensen, A. M. K. (2010). Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell Systematic Reviews. Campbell Systematic Reviews 2010: Supplement 1. DOI: 10.4073/csrs.2010.1.
60. Herie, M., & Martin, G. W. (2002). Knowledge diffusion in social work: A new approach to bridging the gap. Social Work, 1, 85-95.
61. Higgins, J.P.Y. & Deeks, J.J. (2008) Selecting studies and collecting data. In J.P.Y. Higins and S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series. DOI: 10.1002/9780470712184.ch7
62. Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2009). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Available from www.cochranehandbook.org.
63. Holosko, M. (2010). What types of designs are we using in social work research and evaluation? Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 665-673. First published on June 26, 2009. DOI: 10.1177/1049731509339586.
64. Joanna Briggs Institute. (2008). Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual:2008 Edition. Adelaide, South Australia: Joanna Briggs Institute. Available from http://www.joannabriggs.edu.au/about/system_review.php.
65. Juni, P., Altman, D. G., & Egger, M. (2001). Assessing the quality of randomised control trials. In M. Egger, G. D. Smith, & D. G. Altman (Eds.), Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context (2nd ed., pp. 87-108). London: BMJ Publishing.
66. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
67. Kindler, H. (2008). Developing evidence-based child protection practice: A view from Germany. Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 319-24. DOI:10.1177/1049731507308997.
68. Kirk, S. A., & Reid, W. J. (2002). Science and Social Work: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Columbia University Press.
69. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., P. J., Devereaux, P. J., Jos Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. Available from BMJ 2009;339:b2700. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2700.
70. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
71. Littell, J. (2005). Lessons from a systematic review of effects of multisystematic therapy. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 445-463.
72. Littell, J., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
73. Littell, J., Popa, M., Forsythe, B. (2005). Multisystemic therapy for social, emotional, and behavioral problems in youth aged 10-17. Campbell Systematic Reviews 2005.1. DOI: 10.4073/csr.2005.1
74. MacWilliam, S., Maggs, P., Caldwell, A., & Tierney, S. (2003). Accessing Social Care Research: An Introductory Guide. Exeter, UK: Centre for Evidence-Based Social Services, University of Exeter.
75. Mahoney, M. K. (1977). Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 1, 161-175.
76. Maniglio, R. (2010). Child sexual abuse in the etiology of depression: A systematic review of reviews. Depression and Anxiety, 27, 631-642.
77. Martin, B. (1998). Information Liberation. London: Freedom Press.
78. Mays, N., & Pope, E. (2006). Quality in qualitative health research. In C. Pope & N. Mays (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Health Care (3rd ed., pp. 82-101). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
79. Mays, N., Pope, C., & Popay, J. (2005). Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. Journal of Health Services Research Policy, 10(Suppl. 1), 6-20.
80. McCracken, S. G., & Marsh, J. C. (2008). Practitioner expertise in evidencebased practice decision-making. Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 301-310. DOI: 10.1177/1049731507308143.
81. McKibbon, K. A., Wilczynski, N. L., & Haynes, R. B. (2006). Developing optimal search strategies for retrieving qualitative studies in PsycINFO. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 29, 440-454.
82. Mishna, F., Cook, C., Saini, M., Wu, M. J., & MacFadden, R. (2009). Interventions for children, youth, and parents to prevent and reduce cyber abuse. Campbell Systematic Reviews 2009:2. DOI: 10.4073/csr.2009.2
83. Mohr, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2535.
84. Mullen, E. J. (2006). Facilitating practitioner use of evidence-based practice. In A. R. Roberts & K. R. Yeager (Eds.), Foundations of Evidence-Based Social Work Practice (pp. 152-159). New York: Oxford University Press.
85. Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Qualitative Research Methods, Vol. 11. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
86. Noyes, J., & Popay, J. (2006). Directly observed therapy and tuberculosis: How can a review of qualitative research contribute to improving services? A qualitative meta-synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57, 227-243.
87. Noyes, J., Popay, J., Pearson, A., Hannes, K., & Booth, A. (2009). Qualitative research and Cochrane reviews. In J. P. T. Higgins & S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
88. Oxman, A. D. (2001). The Cochrane Collaboration in the 21st century: Ten challenges and one reason why they must be met. In M. Egger, G. D. Smith, & D. G. Altman (Eds.), Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context (2nd ed., pp. 459-473). London: BMJ Publishing.
89. Padgett, D. K. (1998). Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research:Challenges and Rewards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
90. Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C., & Jillings, C. (2001). Qualitative Health Research: A Practical Guide to Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
91. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
92. Popay, J., Rogers, A., & Williams, G. (1998). Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 341-351.
93. Pope, E., & Mays, N. (2006). Synthesising qualitative research. In C. Pope & N. Mays (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Health Care (3rd ed., pp. 142-152). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
94. Proctor, E. (1998). Social Work Research and the Quest for Effective Practice. Paper presented at the 10th National Symposium on Doctoral Research in Social Work, The Ohio State University College of Social Work, Columbus, OH, May 1998.
95. Reed, J. G. & Baxter, P. M. (2009). Using reference databases. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2nd ed., pp. 51-71). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
96. Reichow, B. & Volkmar, F. (2010). Social skills group interventions for autism spectrum disorders in individuals aged 6 to 21 years [Protocol]. http://campbellcollaboration.org/lib/.
97. Rennie, E. (1997). Thyroid storm. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 1238-1243.
98. Richardson, W. S., & Wilson, M. C. (1997). On questions, background and foreground. Evidence Based Health Care Newsletter, 17, 8-9.
99. Richmond, M. (1917). Social Diagnosis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
100. Roberts, A. R., & Yeager, K. R. (Eds.). (2004). Evidence-Based Practice Manual: Research and Outcome Measures in Health and Human Services. New York: Oxford University Press.
101. Roen, K., Arai, L., Roberts, H., & Popay, J. (2006). Extending systematic reviews to include evidence on implementation: Methodological work on a review of community-based initiatives to prevent injuries. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 1060-1071.
102. Rosen, A., & Proctor, E. K. (2003). Developing Practice Guidelines for Social Work Intervention: Issues, Methods and Research. New York: Columbia University Press.
103. Rosen, A., Proctor, E. K., & Staudt, M. (1999). Social work research and the quest for effective practice. Social Work Research, 23, 4-14.
104. Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (Eds.) (2005). Publication Bias in Meta-analysis: Prevention, Assessment, and Adjustments. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
105. Rubin, A. (2008). Practitioner's Guide to Using Evidence-Based Practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
106. Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2010). Essential Research Methods for Social Work. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
107. Rubin, A., & Parrish, D. (2007). Problematic phrases in the conclusions of published outcome studies: Implications for evidence-based practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 334-347. DOI:10.1177/1049731506293726.
108. Rubin, A., & Parrish, D. (2008). Locating credible studies for evidence-based practice. In A. R. Roberts (Ed.), Social Workers Desk Reference (2nd ed., pp. 1127-1136). New York: Oxford University Press.
109. Sackett, D. L., Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (2000). Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM (2nd ed.). New York: Churchill Livingstone.
110. Saini, M., & Shlonsky, A. (2008). Developing a protocol for systematic synthesis within C2 reviews: Expanding the evidence for decisions in education, social welfare and criminal justice. The Eighth Annual International Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, May 12-14.
111. Saini, M., & Shlonsky, A. (2011). Systematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research: A Pocket Guide for Social Work Research Methods. New York:Oxford University Press.
112. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003a). Creating metasummaries of qualitative findings. Nursing Research, 52, 226-233.
113. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003b). Toward a metasynthesis of qualitative findings on motherhood in HIV-positive women. Research in Nursing & Health, 26, 153-170.
114. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. New York: Springer.
115. Schwandt, T. A. (1997). Qualitative Inquiry: A Dictionary of Terms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
116. Sellers, S. L., Mathiesen, S. G., Perry, R., & Smith, T. (2004). Evaluation of social work journal quality: Citation versus reputation approaches. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 143-160.
117. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston:Houghton-Mifflin.
118. Shadish, W. R., Doherty, M., & Montgomery, L. M. (1989). How many studies are in the file drawer? An estimate from the family/marital psychotherapy literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 589-603. DOI: 10.1016/0272-7358(89)90013-5.
119. Shek, D. T. L., Tang, V. M. Y., & Han. X. Y. (2005). Evaluation of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work literature (1990-2003): Evidence that constitutes a wake-up call. Research on Social Work Practice, 15, 180-194.
120. Simes, R. J. (1986). Publication bias: The case for an international registry of clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 4, 1529-1541.
121. Smedslund, G., Berg, R. C., Hammerstrøm, K. T., Steiro, A., Leiknes, K. A., Dahl, M. H., & Karlsen, K. (2009). Motivational interviewing for substance abuse [Protocol]. Campbell Systematic Reviews. http://campbellcollaboration.org/lib/.
122. Social Care Institute for Excellence (2005). Guidelines for Preparing a Research Review: Appendix 2. http://www.scie.org.uk/opportunities/commissions/files/appendix2.pdf.
123. Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Dillon, L. (2003). Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence. Government Chief Social Researcher's Office, Prime Minister's Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, London. Available from www.gsr.gov.uk/downloads/evaluating_policy/a_quality_framework.pdf.
124. Sterne, J. A. C., Juni, P., Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Bartlett, C., & Egger, M. (2002). Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in "meta-epidemiological" research. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1513-1524.
125. Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Glasziou, P., & Haynes, R. B. (2005). Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM (3rd ed.). Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone.
126. Sundell, K., Soydan, H., Tengvald, K., & Anttila, S. (2010). From opinion to evidence-based social work: The Swedish case. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 714-722. DOI: 10.1177/1049731509347887.
127. Thomas, E. J. (1978). Research and service in single-case experimentation: Conflicts and choices. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 14, 20-32.
128. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(45). DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
129. Thyer, B. A. (2001a). The Handbook of Social Work Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
130. Thyer, B. A. (2001b). Introductory Principles of Social Work Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
131. Tong, A., Morton, R., Howard, K., & Craig, J. C. (2009). Adolescent experiences following organ transplantation: A systematic review of qualitative studies. The Journal of Pediatrics, 155, 542-549.
132. Torgerson, C. (2003). Systematic Reviews. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
133. Wade, A., & Gomersall, A. (2007). Search strategies. Workshop presented at the Seventh Annual International Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, London, England, May 14-16.
134. Wade, A., & Rothstein, H. (2007). Systematic reviews and information retrieval: Planning and implementing a database search. Workshop presented at the Seventh Annual International Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, London, England, May 14-16.
135. Wade, A., Turner, H. M., Rothstein, H. R., & Lavenberg, J. G. (2006). Information retrieval and the role of the information specialist in producing high-quality systematic reviews in the social, behavioural and education sciences. Evidence and Policy, 2(1), 89-108.
136. What Works for Children Group. (2003). Evidence Guide: An Introduction to Finding, Judging, and Using Research Findings on What Works for Children and Young People. London: City University.
137. White, H. D. (2009). Scientific communication and literature retrieval. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2nd ed., pp. 51-71). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
138. Williamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 15, 202-207.
139. Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.