Evidence-based practice: Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence

Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 202-207

  Williamson, Kathleen M ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence; Evidence based practice; Mental health; Qualitative designs; Qualitative inquiry

Indexed keywords

EID: 68949149631     PISSN: 10783903     EISSN: 15325725     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1078390309338733     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ayers, L. (2007). Qualitative research proposals-Part I. Journal Wound Ostomy Continence Nursing, 34, 30-32.
2. Cutcliffe, J. R., & McKenna, H. P. (1999). Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: The plot thickens. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30, 374-380.
3. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Duffy, M. E. (2005). Resources for critically appraising qualitative research evidence of nursing practice clinical question. Clinical Nursing Specialist, 19, 288-290.
5. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (Eds.). (2005). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
7. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expend sourcebook qualitative data analysis (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Milne, J., & Oberle, K. (2005). Enhancing rigor in qualitative description: A case study. Journal Wound Ostomy Continence Nursing, 32, 413-420.
9. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
10. Ploeg, J. (1999). Identifying the best research design to fit the question Part 2: Qualitative designs. Evidence-Based Nursing, 2, 36-37.
11. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2008). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence fro nursing practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
12. Powers, B. A. (2005). Critically appraising qualitative evidence. In B. M. Melnyk & E. Fineout-Overholt (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare (pp. 127-162). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
13. Rice, M. J. (2008). Evidence-based practice in psychiatric care: Defining levels of evidence. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 14(3), 181-187.
14. Russell, C. K., & Gregory, D. M. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 6, 36-40.
15. Saddler, D. (2006). Research 101. Gastroenterology Nursing, 30, 314-316.
16. Sandelowski, M. (2004). Using qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 1366-1386.
17. Speziale, H. J. S., & Carpenter, D. R. (2003). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
18. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
19. Thorne, S. (2000). Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 3, 68-70.