Creative thought as blind variation and selective retention: Why creativity is inversely related to sightedness

Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 253-266

  Simonton, Dean Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Blindness; BVSR; Creativity; Sightedness

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878909133     PISSN: 10688471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0030705     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.
2. Bain, A. (1977). The senses and the intellect (D. N. Robinson, Ed.). Washington, DC: University Publications of America. (Original work published 1855)
3. Beveridge, W. I. B. (1957). The art of scientific investigation (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Vintage.
4. Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths & mechanisms (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
5. Bowers, K. S., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C., & Parker, K. (1990). Intuition in the context of discovery. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 72-110. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(90)90004-N
6. Bradie, M. (1995). Epistemology from an evolutionary point of view. In E. Sober (Ed.), Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology (2nd ed., pp. 454-475). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Briskman, L. (2009). Creative product and creative process in science and art. In M. Krausz, D. Dutton, & K. Bardsley (Eds.), The idea of creativity (2nd ed., pp. 17-41). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill. (Original work published 1980) doi:10.1163/ej .9789004174443.i-348.12
8. Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380-400. doi:10.1037/h0040373
9. Campbell, D. T. (1974a). Evolutionary epistemology. In P. A. Schlipp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper (pp. 413-463). La Salle, IL: Open Court.
10. Campbell, D. T. (1974b). Unjustified variation and selective retention in scientific discovery. In F. Ayala & T. Dobszhansky (Eds.), Studies in the philosophy of biology: Reduction and related problems (pp. 139-161). London, UK: Macmillan.
11. Constant, E. W., II. (1978). On the diversity of co-evolution of technological multiples: Steam turbines and Pelton water wheels. Social Studies of Science, 8, 183-210. doi:10.1177/030631277800800202
12. Cziko, G. A. (1998). From blind to creative: In defense of Donald Campbell's selectionist theory of human creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 192-208. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00815.x
13. Cziko, G. A. (2001). Universal selection theory and the complementarity of different types of blind variation and selective retention. In C. Heyes & D. L. Hull (Eds.), Selection theory and social construction: The evolutionary naturalistic episte-mology of Donald T. Campbell (pp. 15-34). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
14. Damian, R. I., & Simonton, D. K. (2011). From past to future art: The creative impact of Picasso's 1935 Minotauromachy on his 1937 Guernica. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 360-369. doi:10.1037/a0023017
15. Dasgupta, S. (2011). Contesting (Simonton's) blind variation, selective retention theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 166-182. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2011.571190
16. Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
17. Diaz de Chumaceiro, C. L. (1995). Serendipity or pseudoserendipity? Unexpected versus desired results. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29, 143-147. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1995.tb00742.x
18. Gabora, L. (2010). Why blind-variation and selective-retention is an inappropriate explanatory framework for creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 182-183. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2010.04.008
19. Gabora, L. (2011). An analysis of the blind variation and selective retention theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 155-165. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2011.571187
20. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454. doi:10.1037/h0063487
21. Hélie, S., & Ron, S. (2010). Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 117, 994-1024. doi:10.1037/a0019532
22. Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
23. Heyes, C., & Hull, D. L. (Eds.). (2001). Selection theory and social construction: The evolutionary naturalistic epistemology of Donald T. Campbell. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
24. James, W. (1880, October). Great men, great thoughts, and the environment. Atlantic Monthly, 46, 441-459.
25. Jevons, W. S. (1900). The principles of science: A treatise on logic and scientific method (2nd ed.). London, UK: Macmillan. (Original work published 1877)
26. Kantorovich, A. (1993). Scientific discovery: Logic and tinkering. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
27. Kantorovich, A., & Ne'eman, Y. (1989). Serendipity as a source of evolutionary progress in science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 20, 505-529. doi:10.1016/0039-3681(89)90021-6
28. Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622-629. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622
29. Köhler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes (E. Winter, Trans.). New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.
30. Kronfeldner, M. E. (2010). Darwinian "blind" hypothesis formation revisited. Synthese, 175, 193-218. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9498-8
31. Mach, E. (1896, January). On the part played by accident in invention and discovery. Monist, 6, 161-175.
32. Maier, N. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 12, 181-194.
33. Maier, N. R. F. (1940). The behavioral mechanisms concerned with problem solving. Psychological Review, 47, 43-58. doi:10.1037/h0058466
34. Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic styles. New York, NY: Basic Books.
35. Martindale, C. (2009). Evolutionary models of innovation and creativity. In T. Rickards, M. Runco, & S. Moger (Eds.), Routledge companion to creativity (pp. 109-118). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
36. Nickles, T. (2003). Evolutionary models of innovation and the Meno problem. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 54-78). New York, NY: Elsevier Science. doi:10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50006-1
37. Perkins, D. N. (1998). In the country of the blind: An appreciation of Donald Campbell's vision of creative thought. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 177-191. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00814.x
38. Perkins, D. N. (2000). The eureka effect: The art and logic of breakthrough thinking. New York, NY: Norton.
39. Platt, W., & Baker, R. A. (1931). The relation of the scientific "hunch" to research. Journal of Chemical Education, 8, 1969-2002. doi:10.1021/ed008p1969
40. Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A.,&Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83-96. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
41. Poincaré, H. (1921). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method (G. B. Halstead, Trans.). New York, NY: Science Press.
42. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations. London, NY: Routledge.
43. Runco, M. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657-687. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych .55.090902.141502
44. Runco, M., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92-96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
45. Sawyer, R. K. (2008). Creativity, innovation, and nonobviousness. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 12, 461-487.
46. Seifert, C. M., Meyer, D. E., Davidson, N., Patalano, A. L., & Yaniv, I. (1995). Demystification of cognitive insight: Opportunistic assimilation and the prepared-mind perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 65-124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
48. Simonton, D. K. (2007a). The creative imagination in Picasso's Guernica sketches: Monotonic improvements or nonmonotonic variants? Creativity Research Journal, 19, 329-344. doi:10.1080/10400410701753291
49. Simonton, D. K. (2007b). Creativity: Specialized expertise or general cognitive processes? In M. J. Roberts (Ed.), Integrating the mind: Domain general versus domain specific processes in higher cognition (pp. 351-367). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
50. Simonton, D. K. (2009). Creativity as a Darwinian phenomenon: The blind-variation and selectiveretention model. In M. Krausz, D. Dutton, & K. Bardsley (Eds.), The idea of creativity (2nd ed., pp. 63-81). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill. doi:10.1163/ej .9789004174443.i-348.30
51. Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity as blind-variation and selective-retention: Constrained combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 156-179. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2010.02.002
52. Simonton, D. K. (2011a). Creativity and discovery as blind variation and selective retention: Multiplevariant definitions and blind-sighted integration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 222-228. doi:10.1037/a0023144
53. Simonton, D. K. (2011b). Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell's (1960). BVSR model after the half-century mark. Review of General Psychology, 15, 158-174. doi:10.1037/a0022912
54. Simonton, D. K. (2011c). Debating the BVSR theory of creativity: Comments on Dasgupta (2011) and Gabora (2011). Creativity Research Journal, 23, 381-387. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.621861
55. Simonton, D. K. (2012a). Creativity, problem solving, and solution set sightedness: Radically reformulating BVSR. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 48-65. doi:10.1002/jocb.004
56. Simonton, D. K. (2012b). Foresight, insight, oversight, and hindsight in scientific discovery: How sighted were Galileo's telescopic sightings? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0027058
57. Simonton, D. K. (2012c). Taking the U.S. Patent Office creativity criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97-106.
58. Simonton, D. K. (in press-a). Combinatorial creativity and sightedness: Monte Carlo simulations using three-criterion definitions. International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving.
59. Simonton, D. K. (in press-b). Hierarchies of creative domains: Disciplinary constraints on blindvariation and selective-retention. In E. S. Paul & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), Philosophy of creativity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
60. Simonton, D. K. (in press-c). What is a creative idea? Little-c versus Big-C creativity. In J. Chan & K. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of research on creativity. Cheltenham Glos, UK: Edward Elgar.
61. Simonton, D. K., & Damian, R. I. (in press). Creativity. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1016/B0-12-370870-2/00041-X
62. Sober, E. (1992). Models of cultural evolution. In E. Sober (Ed.), Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology (2nd ed., pp. 477-492). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63. Souriau, P. (1881). Theorie de I'invention [Theory of invention]. Paris, France: Hachette.
64. Staw, B. M. (1990). An evolutionary approach to creativity and innovations. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 287-308). New York, NY: Wiley.
65. Stein, E., & Lipton, P. (1989). Where guesses come from: Evolutionary epistemology and the anomaly of guided vision. Biology & Philosophy, 4, 33-56. doi:10.1007/BF00144038
66. Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in human creativity: Is variation blind or sighted? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 159-176. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00813.x
67. Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The domain generality versus specificity debate: How should it be posed? In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Faces of the muse: How people think, work, and act creatively in diverse domains (pp. 299-306). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677-688. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677
69. Thagard, P. (1988). Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Thagard, P. (2012). Creative combination of representations: Scientific discovery and technological invention. In R. Proctor & E. J. Capaldi (Eds.), Psychology of science: Implicit and explicit processes (pp. 389-405). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
71. Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding: The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
72. Watson, J. D. (1968). The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. New York, NY: Atheneum.
73. Weisberg, R. W. (2004). On structure in the creative process: A quantitative case-study of the creation of Picasso's Guernica. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 23-54. doi:10.2190/EH48-K59C-DFRBLXE7
74. Wertheimer, M. (1982). Productive thinking (M. Wertheimer, Ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1945)
75. Wuketits, F. M. (2001). The philosophy of Donald T. Campbell: A short review and critical appraisal. Journal of Biology and Philosophy, 16, 171-188. doi:10.1023/A:1006721104642