Creativity, problem solving, and solution set sightedness: Radically reformulating BVSR

Journal of Creative Behavior

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 48-65

  Simonton, Dean Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

BVSR; Creativity; Problem solving; Sightedness; Solution sets

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866058413     PISSN: 00220175     EISSN: 21626057     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jocb.004     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. AMABILE, T.M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.
2. BAIN, A. (1977). The senses and the intellect. In D. N. Robinson (Ed.), Washington, DC: University Publications of America. (Original work published 1855).
3. BODEN, M.A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths & mechanisms (2nd edn). New York: Routledge.
4. CAMPBELL, D.T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380-400.
5. CHRISTENSEN, P.R., GUILFORD, J.P., & WILSON, R.C. (1957). Relations of creative responses to working time and instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 82-88.
6. CSIKSZENTMIHÁLYI, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-338). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. CZIKO, G.A. (1998). From blind to creative: In defense of Donald Campbell's selectionist theory of human creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 192-208.
8. DAMIAN, R.I., & SIMONTON, D.K. (2011). From past to future art: The creative impact of Picasso's 1935 Minotauromachy on his 1937 Guernica. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 360-369. doi: 10.1037/a0023017
9. DASGUPTA, S. (2011). Contesting (Simonton's) blind variation, selective retention theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 166-182.
10. DERKS, P., & HERVAS, D. (1988). Creativity in humor production: Quantity and quality in divergent thinking. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 37-39.
11. DOYLE, C. (2008). Exploring the creation of Picasso's Guernica: Composition studies, chance, metaphors, and expertise. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 445-450.
12. ENDLER, N.S., RUSHTON, J.P., & ROEDIGER, H.L. III (1978). Productivity and scholarly impact (citations) of British, Canadian, and U.S. departments of psychology (1975). American Psychologist, 33, 1064-1082.
13. FINKE, R.A., WARD, T.B., & SMITH, S.M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. GABORA, L. (2011). An analysis of the blind variation and selective retention theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 155-165.
15. GETZELS, J., & CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.
16. GOLDBERG, D.E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17. GUILFORD, J.P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. HÉLIE, S., & RON, S. (2010). Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 117, 994-1024.
19. HENNESSEY, B.A., & AMABILE, T.M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598.
20. JAMES, W. (1880, October). Great men, great thoughts, and the environment. Atlantic Monthly, 46, 441-459.
21. KANTOROVICH, A. (1993). Scientific discovery: Logic and tinkering. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
22. KAUFMAN, J.C., & STERNBERG, R.J. (2010). Preface. In: J.C. Kaufman, & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. xiii-xv). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. KRONFELDNER, M.E. (2010). Darwinian 'blind' hypothesis formation revisited. Synthese, 175, 193-218. doi: 10.1007/s11229-009-9498-8
24. KUHN, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd edn.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. LANGLEY, P., SIMON, H.A., BRADSHAW, G.L., & ZYTHOW, J.M. (1987). Scientific discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. LORENZO-SEVA, U., & TEN BERGE, J.M.F. (2006). Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2, 57-64.
27. MAIER, N.R.F. (1931). Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 12, 181-194.
28. MARTINDALE, C. (1973). An experimental simulation of literary change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 319-326.
29. MARTINDALE, C. (2009). Evolutionary models of innovation and creativity. In: T. Rickards, M. Runco, & S. Moger (Eds.), Routledge companion to creativity (pp. 109-118). London: Taylor & Francis.
30. MEDNICK, S.A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.
31. MORAVCSIK, M.J., & MURUGESAN, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5, 86-92.
32. NEWELL, A., & SIMON, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
33. NICKLES, T. (2003). Evolutionary models of innovation and the Meno problem. In: L.V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 54-78). New York: Elsevier Science.
34. PARNES, S. J. (1961). Effects of extended effort in creative problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 117-122.
35. PERKINS, D.N. (1998). In the country of the blind: An appreciation of Donald Campbell's vision of creative thought. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 177-191.
36. PERKINS, D.N. (2000). The eureka effect: The art and logic of breakthrough thinking. New York: Norton.
37. POE, E.A. (1884). The philosophy of composition. In, The works of Edgar Allan Poe (vol. 5, pp. 157-174). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1846)
38. POINCARÉ, H. (1921). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method (G. B. Halstead, Trans.). New York: Science Press.
39. RUNCO, M. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657-687.
40. SIMONTON, D.K. (1976). Philosophical eminence, beliefs, and zeitgeist: An individualgenerational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 630-640.
41. SIMONTON, D.K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. SIMONTON, D.K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
43. SIMONTON, D.K. (2000). Methodological and theoretical orientation and the long-term disciplinary impact of 54 eminent psychologists. Review of General Psychology, 4, 13-24.
44. SIMONTON, D.K. (2007). The creative imagination in Picasso's Guernica sketches: Monotonic improvements or nonmonotonic variants? Creativity Research Journal, 19, 329-344.
45. SIMONTON, D.K. (2010a). Creativity as blind-variation and selective-retention: Constrained combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 156-179.
46. SIMONTON, D.K. (2010b). Reply to comments. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 190-194.
47. SIMONTON, D.K. (2011a). Creativity and discovery as blind variation and selective retention: Multiple-variant definitions and blind-sighted integration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 222-228.
48. SIMONTON, D.K. (2011b). Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell's (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark. Review of General Psychology, 15, 158-174.
49. SIMONTON, D.K. (2011c). Debating the BVSR theory of creativity: Comments on Dasgupta (2011) and Gabora (2011). Creativity Research Journal, 23, 381-387.
50. SIMONTON, D.K. (2012a). Foresight, insight, oversight, and hindsight in scientific discovery: How sighted were Galileo's telescopic sightings? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0027058.
51. SIMONTON, D.K. (2012b). Taking the US Patent Office creativity criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal.
52. SIMONTON, D.K., & DAMIAN, R.I. (2012). Creativity. In: D. Reisberg (Ed.), Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. SOBER, E. (1992). Models of cultural evolution. In: P. Griffiths (Ed.), Trees of life: Essays in philosophy of biology (pp. 17-39). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. SOURIAU, P. (1881). Theorie de I'invention. Paris: Hachette.
55. STAW, B.M. (1990). An evolutionary approach to creativity and innovations. In: M.A. West, & J.L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 287-308). New York: Wiley.
56. STERNBERG, R.J. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in human creativity: Is variation blind or sighted? Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 159-176.
57. STERNBERG, R.J. (1999). Darwinian creativity as a conventional religious faith. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 357-359.
58. THAGARD, P. (1988). Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. THAGARD, P., & STEWART, T.C. (2011). The AHA! experience: Creativity through emergent binding in neural networks. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 35, 1-33.
60. TOULMIN, S. (1981). Evolution, adaptation, and human understanding. In: M.B. Brewer, & B.E. Collins (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (pp. 18-36). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
61. WALLAS, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
62. WATSON, J.D. (1968). The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. New York: Atheneum.
63. WEISBERG, R.W. (2004). On structure in the creative process: A quantitative case-study of the creation of Picasso's Guernica. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 23-54.