Integrating process and genre into the second language writing classroom: Research into practice

Language Teaching

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 382-393

  Racelis, Juval V ^a   Matsuda, Paul Kei ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878898995     PISSN: 02614448     EISSN: 14753049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0261444813000116     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Berlin, J. A. (1988). Rhetoric and ideology in the writing class. College English 50, 477-494.
2. Blanton, L. L. & B. Kroll (with A. Cumming, M. Erickson, A. M. Johns, I. Leki, J. Reid & T. Silva) (2002). ESL composition tales: Reflections on teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
3. Brière, E. J. (1966). Quantity before quality in second language composition. Language Learning 16, 141-151.
4. Casanave, C. P. (2003). Looking ahead to more sociopolitically-oriented case study research in L2 writing scholarship: (But should it be called 'post-process'?). Journal of Second Language Writing 12, 85-102.
5. Elbow, P. (1999). Research in defense of private writing: Consequences for theory and research.Written Communication 16.2, 139-170.
6. Ellis, R. & F. Yuan (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26.1, 59-84.
7. Erazmus, E. T. (1960). Second language composition teaching at the intermediate level. Language Learning 10, 25-31.
8. Faigley, L. (1986). Competing theories of process: A critique and proposal. College English 48, 527-542.
9. Ferris, D. & J. Hedgecock (2005). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Flower, L. & J. R. Hayes (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication 32.4, 365-387.
11. Hale, G., C. Taylor, B. Bridgeman, J. Carson, B. Kroll & R. Kantor (1996). A study of writing tasks assigned in academic degree programs. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
12. Horowitz, D. (1986). Process and product: Less than meets the eye. TESOL Quarterly 20, 141-144.
13. Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing 16.3, 148-164.
14. Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly 30.1, 693-722.
15. James, M. A. (2009). 'Far' transfer of learning outcomes from an ESL writing course: Can the gap be bridged? Journal of Second Language Writing 18, 69-84.
16. James, M. A. (2010). An investigation of learning transfer in English-for-general-academic-purposes writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing 19, 183-206.
17. Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role and context: Developing academic literacies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Johns, A. M. (2002). Destabilizing students' literacy theories. In A. M. Johns (ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 237-248.
19. Johns, A. M. (2008). Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest. Language Teaching 41.2, 237-252.
20. Johns, A. M. (2011). The future of genre in L2 writing: Fundamental, but contested, instructional decisions. Journal of Second Language Writing 20.1, 56-68.
21. Kent, T. (ed.) (1999). Post-process theory: Beyond the writing-process paradigm. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
22. Krapels, A. R. (1990). An overview of second language writing process research. In B. Kroll (ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press, 37-56.
23. Kroll, B. (1990). Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom. The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lave, J. & E. Wenger (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Matsuda, P. K. (2001). Reexamining audiolingualism: On the genesis of reading and writing in L2 studies. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (eds.), Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 84-105.
26. Matsuda, P. K. (2002). Reinventing giants. In L. L. Blanton & B. Kroll (eds.), ESL composition tales: Reflections on teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 163-171.
27. Matsuda, P. K. (2003a). Process and post-process: A discursive history. Journal of Second LanguageWriting 12, 65-83.
28. Matsuda, P. K. (2003b). Second language writing in the twentieth century: A situated historical perspective. In B. Kroll (ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press, 15-34.
29. Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70, 151-176.
30. Murray, D. (1972). Teach writing as a process not product. The Leaflet 71, 11-14.
31. Pincas, A. (1962). Structural linguistics and systematic composition teaching to students of English as a second language. Language Learning 12.3, 185-194.
32. Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly 25, 407-430.
33. Rivers, W. (1968). Teaching foreign language skills. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34. Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues and directions in ESL. In B. Kroll (ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press, 11-23.
35. Spack, R. (1988). Initiating ESL students into the academic discourse community: How far should we go? TESOL Quarterly 22, 29-51.
36. Susser, B. (1994). Process approaches in ESL/EFL writing instructions. Journal of Second LanguageWriting 3.1, 31-47.
37. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Tardy, C. M. (2009). Building genre knowledge. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.