The generation and recall of personally relevant information

Journal of Experimental Education

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 293-315

  Czuchry, Michael ^a   Dansereau, Donald F ^a  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032392230     PISSN: 00220973     EISSN: 19400683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220979809601403     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alvermann, D. E. (1986). Graphic organizers: Cuing dfevices for comprehending and remembering main ideas. In J. F. Bauman (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (pp. 210-226). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
2. Baddeley, A. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
3. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
4. Caccamise, D.J. (1983). Idea generation in writing. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time (pp. 224-253). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Czuchy, M., Chmielewsky, T. L., Moreland, J. L., & Dansereau, D. F. (1995). Spatial formats enhance the recall of self-generated information. Poster presented at the 7th Annual American Psychological Society convention, New York.
6. Dansereau, D. F. (1978). The development of a learning strategies curriculum. In H. F. O'Neil, Jr. (Ed.), Learning strategies (pp. 1-29). New York: Academic Press.
7. Deignan, G. M. (1973). Delta Reading Vocabulary Test. Lowry Air Force Base, CO: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
8. Gardiner, J. M., & Hampton, J. A. (1985). Semantic memory and the generation effect: Some tests of the lexical activation hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(4), 732-741.
9. Gardiner, J. M., & Rowley, J. M. C. (1984). A generation effect with numbers rather than words. Memory & Cognition, 12(5), 443-445.
10. Holley, C. D., Dansereau, D. F., McDonald, B. A., Garland, J. C., & Collins, K. W. (1979). Evaluation of a hierarchical mapping technique as an aid to prose processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4, 221-241
11. Johns, E. E., & Swanson, L. G. (1988). The generation effect with nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(1), 180-190.
12. Lambiotte, J. G., Dansereau, D. F., Cross, D. R., & Reynolds, S. B. (1989). Multirelational semantic maps. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 331-367.
13. Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
14. Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19, 29-52.
15. Osbom, A. E (1963). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner's Sons.
16. Patterson, M. E. (1993). A conceptual analysis of spatial-semantic display processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth.
17. Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G., & Camacho, L. M. (1993). Perceptions of performance in group brainstorming: The illusion of group productivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 78-89.
18. Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, S(3), 162-166.
19. Perfetto, G. A., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1983). Constraints on access in a problem solving context. Memory & Cognition, 11(1), 24-31.
20. Peynircioglu, Z. F. (1989). The generation effect with pictures and nonsense figures. Acta Psycho-logica, 70, 153-160.
21. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(6), 592-604.
22. Weisberg, R., DiCamillo, M., & Phillips, D. (1978). Transferring old associations to new situations: A nonautomatic process. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 219-228.