Optimized design and analysis of sparse-sampling fMRI experiments

Frontiers in Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue 7 APR, 2013, Pages

  Perrachione, Tyler K ^a,b,d   Ghosh, Satrajit S ^b,c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d not available   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory neuroscience; FMRI; Hemodynamic response; HRF; Sparse sampling; Speech perception; Speech production

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HEARING; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; LANGUAGE; MUSIC; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SAMPLING; SAMPLING ERROR; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPARSE SAMPLING; SPEECH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STIMULUS;

EID: 84878886797     PISSN: 16624548     EISSN: 1662453X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00055     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adank, P. (2012). Design choices in imaging speech comprehension: an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis. Neuroimage 63, 1601-1613.
2. Aguirre, G. E., Zarahn, E., and D'Esposito, M. (1998). The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses. Neuroimage 8, 360-369.
3. Amaro, E., Williams, S. C. R., Shergill, S. S., Fu, C. H. Y., MacSweeney, M., Picchioni, M. M., et al.(2002). Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: current strategies and future prospects. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 16, 497-510.
4. Avants, B. B., Epstein, C. L., Grossman, M., and Gee, J. C. (2008). Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Med. Image Anal. 12, 26-41.
5. Bandettini, P. A., Jesmanowicz, A., Van Kylen, J., Birn, R. M., and Hyde, J. S. (1998). Fuinctional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise. Magn. Reson. Med. 39, 410-416.
6. Belin, P., Zatorre, R. J., Hoge, R., Evans, A. C., and Pike, B. (1999). Event-related fMRI of auditory cortex. Neuroimage 10, 417-429.
7. Birn, R. M., Cox, R. W., and Bandettini, P. A. (2004). Experimental designs and processing strategies for fMRI studies involving overt verbal responses. Neuroimage 23, 1046-1058.
8. Blackman, G. A., and Hall, D. A. (2011). Reducing the effects of background noise during auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging of speech processing: qualitative and quantitative comparison between two image acquisition schemes and noise cancellation. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 54, 693-704.
9. Carp, J. (2012). The secret lives of experiments: methods reporting in the fMRI literature. Neuroimage 63, 289-300.
10. Cox, R. W. (1996). AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 29, 162-173.
11. Dale, A. M. (1999). Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8, 109-114.
12. Dale, A. M., and Buckner, R. L. (1997). Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 5, 329-340.
13. Dale, A. M., Fischl, B., and Sereno, M. I. (1999). Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9, 179-194.
14. Edmister, W. B., Talavage, T. M., Ledden, P. J., and Weisskoff, R. M. (1999). Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisition. Hum. Brain Mapp. 7, 89-97.
15. Gaab, N., Gabrieli, J. D. E., and Glover, G. H. (2006a). Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28, 703-720.
16. Gaab, N., Gabrieli, J. D. E., and Glover, G. H. (2006b). Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28, 721-732.
17. Gaab, N., Gabrieli, J. D. E., and Glover, G. H. (2008). Resting in peace or noise: scanner background noise suppresses default-mode network. Hum. Brain Mapp. 29, 858-867.
18. Gorgolewski, K., Burns, C. D., Madison, C., Clark, D., Halchenko, Y. O., Waskom, M. L., et al. (2011). Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in Python. Front. Neuroinform. 5:13. doi:10.3389/fninf.2011.00013
19. Gracco, V. L., Tremblay, P., and Pike, B. (2005). Imaging speech production using fMRI. Neuroimage 26, 294-301.
20. Grill-Spector, K., and Malach, R. (2001). fMRI adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 107, 293-321.
21. Hall, D. A., Chambers, J., Akeroyd, M. A., Foster, J. R., Coxon, R., and Palmer, A. R. (2009). Acoustic, psychophysical, and neuroimaging measurements of the effectiveness of active cancellation during auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 347-359.
22. Hall, D. A., Haggard, M. P., Akeroyd, M. A., Palmer, A. R., Summerfield, A. Q., Eliott, M. R., et al. (1999). "Sparse" temporal sampling in auditory fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 7, 213-223.
23. Hall, D. A., Summerfield, A. Q., Gonçalves, M. S., Foster, J. R., Palmer, A. R., and Bowtell, R. W. (2000). Time-course of the auditory BOLD response to scanner noise. Magn. Reson. Med. 43, 601-606.
24. Harms, M. P., and Melcher, J. R. (2003). Detection and quantification of a wide range of fMRI temporal responses using a physiologically-motivated basis set. Hum. Brian Mapp. 20, 168-183.
25. Hu, S., Olulade, O., Gonzalez-Castillo, J., Santos, J., Kim, S., Tamer, G. G. Jr., et al. (2010). Modeling hemodynamic responses in auditory cortex at 1.5 T using variable duration imaging acoustic noise. Neuroimage 49, 3027-3038.
26. Langers, D. R. M., and van Dijk, P. (2011). Robustness of intrinsic connectivity networks in the human brain to the presence of acoustic scanner noise. Neuroimage 55, 1617-1632.
27. Langers, D. R. M., van Dijk, P., and Backes, W. H. (2004). Interactions between hemodynamic responses to scanner acoustic noise and auditory stimuli in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 53, 49-60.
28. Liem, F., Lutz, K., Luechinger, R., Jäncke, L., and Meyer, M. (2012). Reducing the interval between volume acquisitions improves "sparse" scanning protocols in event-related auditory fMRI. Brain Topogr. 25, 182-193.
29. Nebel, K., Stude, P., Wiese, H., Müller, B., de Greiff, A., Forsting, M., et al. (2005). Sparse imaging and continuous event-related fMRI in the visual domain: a systematic comparison. Hum. Brain Mapp. 24, 130-143.
30. Peelle, J. E., Eason, R. J., Schmitter, S., Schwarzbauer, C., and Davis, M. H. (2010). Evaluating an acoustically quiet EPI sequence for use in fMRI studies of speech and auditory processing. Neuroimage 52, 1410-1419.
31. Petkov, C. I., Kayser, C., Auguth, M., and Logothetis, N. K. (2009). Optimizing the imaging of the monkey auditory cortex: sparse vs. continuous fMRI. Magn. Reson. Imaging 27, 1065-1073.
32. Poldrack, R. A., Fletcher, P. C., Henson, R. N., Worsley, K. J., Brett, M., and Nichols, T. E. (2006). Guidelines for reporting an fMRI study. Neuroimage 40, 409-414.
33. Price, C. (2012). A review and synthesis of 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language, and reading. Neuroimage 62, 816-847.
34. Ravicz, M. E., and Melcher, J. R. (2001). Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 216-231.
35. Ravicz, M. E., Melcher, J. R., and Kiang, N. Y.-S. (2000). Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1683-1696.
36. Roche, A. (2011). A four-dimensional registration algorithm with application to joint correction of motion and slice timing in fMRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 30, 1546-1554.
37. Scarff, C. J., Dort, J. C., Eggermont, J. J., and Goodyear, B. G. (2004). The effect of MR scanner noise on auditory cortex activity using fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 22, 341-349.
38. Scheffler, K., Bilecen, D., Schmid, N., Tschopp, K., and Seelig, J. (1998). Auditory cortical responses in hearing subjects and unilateral deaf patients as detected by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb. Cortex 8, 156-163.
39. Schmidt, C. F., Zaehle, T., Meyer, M., Geiser, E., Boesiger, P., and Jancke, L. (2008). Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task. Hum. Brain Mapp. 29, 46-56.
40. Schwarzbauer, C., Davis, M. H., Rodd, J. M., and Johnstrude, I. (2006). Interleaved silent steady state (ISSS) imaging: a new sparse imaging method applied to auditory fMRI. Neuroimage 29, 774-782.
41. Seifritz, E., Di Salle, F., Esposito, F., Herdener, M., Neuhoff, J. G., and Scheffler, K. (2005). Enhancing BOLD response in the auditory system by neurophysiologically tuned fMRI sequence. Neuroimage 39, 1013-1022.
42. Smith, S. M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M. W., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Johansen-Berg, H., et al. (2004). Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23, 208-219.
43. Talavage, T. M., and Hall, D. A. (2012). How challenges in auditory fMRI led to general advancements in the field. Neuroimage 62, 641-647.
44. Tomasi, D., Caparelli, E. C., Chang, L., and Ernst, T. (2005). fMRI-acoustic noise alters brain activation during working memory tasks. Neuroimage 27, 377-386.
45. Wink, A. M., and Roerdink, J. B. T. M. (2006). BOLD noise assumptions in fMRI. Int. J. Biomed. Imaging 12014, 1-11.
46. Zaehle, T., Schmidt, C. F., Meyer, M., Baumann, S., Baltes, C., Boesiger, P., et al. (2007). Comparisons of "silent" clustered and sparse temporal fMRI acquisition in tonal and speech perception tasks. Neuroimage 37, 1195-1204.