How challenges in auditory fMRI led to general advancements for the field

NeuroImage

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 641-647

  Talavage, Thomas M ^a   Hall, Deborah A ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; Clustered volume acquisitions; Sparse sampling; Tonotopy

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY MASKING; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN MAPPING; CLUSTERED VOLUME ACQUISITION SEQUENCE; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SAMPLING; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPARSE SAMPLING; STEADY STATE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TONOTOPY; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY;

EID: 84862977179     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.006     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Ahveninen J., Jaaskelainen I.P., Raij T., Bonmassar G., Devore S., Hamalainen M., Levanen S., Lin F.H., Sams M., Shinn-Cunningham B.G., Witzel T., Belliveau J.W. Task-modulated "what" and "where" pathways in human auditory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:14608-14613.
2. Allen P., Amaro E., Fu C.H., Williams S.C., Brammer M.J., Johns L.C., McGuire P.K. Neural correlates of the misattribution of speech in schizophrenia. Br. J. Psychiatry 2007, 190:162-169.
3. Bandettini P.A., Wong E.C., Hinks R.S., Tikofsky R.S., Hyde J.S. Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation. Magn. Reson. Med. 1992, 25:390-397.
4. Bandettini P.A., Jesmanowicz A., Van Kylen J., Birn R.M., Hyde J.S. fMRI of scanner noise induced auditory cortex activation. Fifth Scientific Meeting and Exhibition of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vancouver, B.C., Canada 1997, 349.
5. Benson R.R., FitzGerald D.B., LeSueur L.L., Kennedy D.N., Kwong K.K., Buchbinder B.R., Davis T.L., Weisskoff R.M., Talavage T.M., Logan W.J., Cosgrove G.R., Belliveau J.W., Rosen B.R. Language dominance determined by whole brain functional MRI in patients with brain lesions. Neurology 1999, 52:798-809.
6. Bilecen D., Scheffler K., Schmid N., Tschopp K., Seelig J. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex as detected by BOLD-FMRI. Hear. Res. 1998, 126:19-27.
7. Blackman G.A., Hall D.A. Reducing the effects of background noise during auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging of speech processing: qualitative and quantitative comparisons between two image acquisition schemes and noise cancellation. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2011, 54:693-704.
8. Brady T.J. Future prospects for MR imaging. Tenth Annual Meeting of the Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, San Francisco, CA 1991, 2.
9. Buckner R.L., Bandettini P.A., O'Craven K.M., Savoy R.L., Petersen S.E., Raichle M.E., Rosen B.R. Detection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of a cognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93:14878-14883.
10. Cho Z.H., Chung S.C., Lim D.W., Wong E.K. Effects of the acoustic noise of the gradient systems on fMRI: a study on auditory, motor, and visual cortices. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998, 39:331-335.
11. Eden G.F., Joseph J.E., Brown H.E., Brown C.P., Zeffiro T.A. Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: the behavior interleaved gradients technique. Magn. Reson. Med. 1999, 41:13-20.
12. Edmister W.B., Talavage T.M., Ledden P.J., Weisskoff R.M. Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1999, 7:89-97.
13. Formisano E., Kim D.S., Di Salle F., van de Moortele P.F., Ugurbil K., Goebel R. Mirror-symmetric tonotopic maps in human primary auditory cortex. Neuron 2003, 40:859-869.
14. Foster J.R., Hall D.A., Summerfield A.Q., Palmer A.R., Bowtell R.W. Sound-level measurements and calculations of safe noise dosage during EPI at 3 T. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000, 12:157-163.
15. Fu C.H., Suckling J., Williams S.C., Andrew C.M., Vythelingum G.N., McGuire P.K. Effects of psychotic state and task demand on prefrontal function in schizophrenia: an fMRI study of overt verbal fluency. Am. J. Psychiatry 2005, 162:485-494.
16. Galaburda A., Sanides F. Cytoarchitectonic organization of the human auditory cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 1980, 190:597-610.
17. Grady C.L., Van Meter J.W., Maisog J.M., Pietrini P., Krasuski J., Rauschecker J.P. Attention-related modulation of activity in primary and secondary auditory cortex. Neuroreport 1997, 8:2511-2516.
18. Hall D.A. fMRI of the auditory cortex. Functional MRI: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications 2006, 364-393. Springer Science and Media Inc., New York. S.H. Faro, M.B. Feroze (Eds.).
19. Hall D.A., Haggard M.P., Akeroyd M.A., Palmer A.R., Summerfield A.Q., Elliott M.R., Gurney E.M., Bowtell R.W. "Sparse" temporal sampling in auditory fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1999, 7:213-223.
20. Hall D.A., Haggard M.P., Akeroyd M.A., Summerfield A.Q., Palmer A.R., Elliott M.R., Bowtell R.W. Modulation and task effects in auditory processing measured using fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2000, 10:107-119.
21. Hall D.A., Haggard M.P., Summerfield A.Q., Akeroyd M.A., Palmer A.R., Bowtell R.W. Functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements of sound-level encoding in the absence of background scanner noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2001, 109:1559-1570.
22. Hall D.A., Chambers J., Akeroyd M.A., Foster J.R., Coxon R., Palmer A.R. Acoustic, psychophysical, and neuroimaging measurements of the effectiveness of active cancellation during auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2009, 125:347-359.
23. Humphries C., Liebenthal E., Binder J.R. Tonotopic organization of human auditory cortex. Neuroimage 2010, 50:1202-1211.
24. Jaaskelainen I.P., Ahveninen J., Bonmassar G., Dale A.M., Ilmoniemi R.J., Levanen S., Lin F.H., May P., Melcher J., Stufflebeam S., Tiitinen H., Belliveau J.W. Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:6809-6814.
25. Korsnes M.S., Hugdahl K., Nygard M., Bjornaes H. An fMRI study of auditory hallucinations in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia 2010, 51:610-617.
26. Langers D.R.M., Melcher J.R. Hearing without listening: functional connectivity reveals the engagement of multiple nonauditory networks during basic sound processing. Brain Connectivity 2011, 1:233-244.
27. Langers D.R., van Dijk P. Robustness of intrinsic connectivity networks in the human brain to the presence of acoustic scanner noise. Neuroimage 2011, 55:1617-1632.
28. Langers D.R., Van Dijk P., Backes W.H. Interactions between hemodynamic responses to scanner acoustic noise and auditory stimuli in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2005, 53:49-60.
29. Lauter J.L., Herscovitch P., Formby C., Raichle M.E. Tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex revealed by positron emission tomography. Hear. Res. 1985, 20:199-205.
30. Liebenthal E., Ellingson M.L., Spanaki M.V., Prieto T.E., Ropella K.M., Binder J.R. Simultaneous ERP and fMRI of the auditory cortex in a passive oddball paradigm. Neuroimage 2003, 19:1395-1404.
31. Mechelli A., Josephs O., Lambon Ralph M.A., McClelland J.L., Price C.J. Dissociating stimulus-driven semantic and phonological effect during reading and naming. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2007, 28:205-217.
32. Merzenich M.M., Brugge J.F. Representation of the cochlear partition of the superior temporal plane of the macaque monkey. Brain Res. 1973, 50:275-296.
33. Merzenich M.M., Knight P.L., Roth G.L. Cochleotopic organization of primary auditory cortex in the cat. Brain Res. 1973, 63:343-346.
34. Morel A., Garraghty P.E., Kaas J.H. Tonotopic organization, architectonic fields, and connections of auditory cortex in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 1993, 335:437-459.
35. Olulade O., Hu S., Gonzalez-Castillo J., Tamer G.G., Luh W.M., Ulmer J.L., Talavage T.M. Assessment of temporal state-dependent interactions between auditory fMRI responses to desired and undesired acoustic sources. Hear. Res. 2011, 277:67-77.
36. Owen A.M., Coleman M.R., Boly M., Davis M.H., Laureys S., Pickard J.D. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science 2006, 313:1402.
37. Pantev C., Hoke M., Lehnertz K., Lutkenhoner B., Anogianakis G., Wittkowski W. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1988, 69:160-170.
38. Peelle J.E., Eason R.J., Schmitter S., Schwarzbauer C., Davis M.H. Evaluating an acoustically quiet EPI sequence for use in fMRI studies of speech and auditory processing. Neuroimage 2010, 52:1410-1419.
39. Ravicz M.E., Melcher J.R. Reducing imager-generated acoustic noise at the ear during functional magnetic resonance imaging: passive attenuation. Twenty-First Midwinter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, St. Petersburg Beach, FL 1998, 208.
40. Rivier F., Clarke S. Cytochrome oxidase, acetylcholinesterase, and NADPH-diaphorase staining in human supratemporal and insular cortex: evidence for multiple auditory areas. Neuroimage 1997, 6:288-304.
41. Romani G.L., Williamson S.J., Kaufman L. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex. Science 1982, 216:1339-1340.
42. Schreiner C.E., Urbas J.V. Representation of amplitude modulation in the auditory cortex of the cat. I. The anterior auditory field (AAF). Hear. Res. 1986, 21:227-241.
43. Schreiner C.E., Urbas J.V. Representation of amplitude modulation in the auditory cortex of the cat. II. Comparison between cortical fields. Hear. Res. 1988, 32:49-63.
44. Sereno M.I., Dale A.M., Reppas J.B., Kwong K.K., Belliveau J.W., Brady T.J., Rosen B.R., Tootell R.B. Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science 1995, 268:889-893.
45. Shergill S.S., Brammer M.J., Williams S.C., Murray R.M., McGuire P.K. Mapping auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2000, 57:1033-1038.
46. Sigalovsky I.S., Melcher J.R. Effects of sound level on fMRI activation in human brainstem, thalamic and cortical centers. Hear. Res. 2006, 215:67-76.
47. Talavage T.M., Edmister W.B. Nonlinearity of FMRI responses in human auditory cortex. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2004, 22:216-228.
48. Talavage T.M., Edmister W.B., Ledden P.J., Weisskoff R.M. Quantitative assessment of auditory cortex responses induced by imager acoustic noise. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1999, 7:79-88.
49. Talavage T.M., Ledden P.J., Benson R.R., Rosen B.R., Melcher J.R. Frequency-dependent responses exhibited by multiple regions in human auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 2000, 150:225-244.
50. Talavage T.M., Sereno M.I., Melcher J.R., Ledden P.J., Rosen B.R., Dale A.M. Tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex revealed by progressions of frequency sensitivity. J. Neurophysiol. 2004, 91:1282-1296.
51. Talavage, T.M., Johnsrude, I.S., Gonzalez Castillo, J., in press. Hemodynamic Imaging: fMRI. In: Poeppel, D., Overath, T., Popper, A.N., Fay, R.R. (Eds.), Human Auditory Cortex. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York.
52. Tomasi D., Caparelli E.C., Chang L., Ernst T. fMRI-acoustic noise alters brain activation during working memory tasks. Neuroimage 2005, 27:377-386.
53. Wessinger C.M., Buonocore M.H., Kussmaul C.L., Mangun G.R. Tonotopy in human auditory cortex examined with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1997, 5:18-25.
54. Wessinger C.M., VanMeter J., Tian B., Van Lare J., Pekar J., Rauschecker J.P. Hierarchical organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2001, 13:1-7.
55. Woodruff P.W., Benson R.R., Bandettini P.A., Kwong K.K., Howard R.J., Talavage T., Belliveau J., Rosen B.R. Modulation of auditory and visual cortex by selective attention is modality-dependent. Neuroreport 1996, 7:1909-1913.