Time-course of the auditory BOLD response to scanner noise

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 601-606

  Hall, Deborah A ^a   Summerfield, A Quentin ^a   Gonçalves, Miguel S ^a   Foster, John R ^a   Palmer, Alan R ^a   Bowtell, Richard W ^b  

^a MRC INSTITUTE OF HEARING RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Auditory; BOLD response; Scanner noise

Indexed keywords

SCANNING;

ACOUSTIC SCANNER NOISE; AUDITORY; AUDITORY RESPONSE; BOLD RESPONSE; NOISE CONTAMINATION; REPETITION TIME; SCANNER NOISE; TEMPORAL RESOLUTION;

ACOUSTIC NOISE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LOW FREQUENCY NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIGNAL DETECTION;

EID: 0034125536     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(200004)43:4<601::AID-MRM16>3.0.CO;2-R     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Sellers MB, Pavlidis JD, Carlberger T. MRI acoustic noise. Int J Neuroradiol 1996;2:549-560.
2. Shellock FG, Ziarati M, Atkinson D, Chen DY. Determination of gradient magnetic field-induced acoustic noise associated with the use of echo planar, and three-dimensional, fast spin echo techniques. J Magn Reson Imag 1998;8:1154-1157.
3. Ravicz ME, Melcher JR. Imager noise and noise attenuation during fMRI. NeuroImage 1999;4:S556.
4. Bandettini PA, Jesmanowicz A, Van Kylen J, Birn RM, Hyde JS. Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:410-416.
5. Talavage TM, Edmister WB, Ledden PJ, Woisskoff RM. Quantitative assessment of auditory cortex responses induced by imager acoustic noise. Human Brain Mapping 1999;7:79-88.
6. Edmister WB, Talavage TM, Ledden P J, Weisskoff RM. Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions. Human Brain Mapping 1999;7:89-97.
7. Elliott MR, Bowtell RW, Morris PG. The effect of scanner sound in visual, motor and auditory functional MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999; 41:1230-1235.
8. Hall DA, Elliott MR, Bowtell RW, Gurney E, Haggard MP. "Sparse" temporal sampling in fMRI enhances detection of activation by sound for both magnetic and acoustical reasons. NeuroImage 1998;7:S551.
9. Hall DA, Haggard MP, Akeroyd MA, Palmer AR, Summerfield AQ, Elliott MR, Gurney EM, Bowtell RW. "Sparse" temporal sampling in auditory fMRI. Human Brain Mapping 1999;7:213-223.
10. Rauschecker JP, Tian B, Pons T, Mishkin M. Serial and parallel processing in rhesus monkey auditory cortex. J Comp Neurol 1997;382: 89-103.
11. Schreiner CE. Spatial distribution of responses to simple and complex sounds in the primary auditory cortex. Audiol Neuro-otol 1998;3:104-122.
12. Belin P, Zatorre RJ, Hoge R, Pike B, Evans AC. Event-related fMRI of the auditory cortex. NeuroImage 1998;7:S369.
13. Robson MD, Dorosz JL, Gore JC. Measurements of the temporal fMRI response of the human auditory cortex to trains of tones. NeuroImage 1998;7:185-198.
14. Palmer AR, Bullock DC, Chambers JD. A high-output, high-quality sound system for use in auditory fMRI. NeuroImage 1998;7:S359.
15. Burkhard MD, Sachs RM. Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1975;58:214-222.
16. Berger EH. Methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices. J Acoust Soc Am 1986;79:1655-1687.
17. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Poline JB, Grasby PJ, Williams SCR, Frackowiak RSJ, Turner R. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. NeuroImage 1995;2:45-53.
18. Leigeois-Chauvel C, Musolino A, Chauvel P. Localisation of the primary auditory area in man. Brain 1991;114:139-153.
19. Leonard CM, Puranik C, Kuldau JM, Lombardino LJ. Normal variation in the frequency and location of human auditory cortex landmarks. Heschl's gyrus: where is it? Cereb Cortex 1998;8:397-406.
20. Rademacher J, Werner C, Schleicher A, Zilles K. Planum temporale and language: cytoarchitectonic variability. NeuroImage 1999;9:S1045.
21. Griffiths TD, Green GGR. Cortical activation during perception of a rotating wide-field acoustic stimulus. NeuroImage 1999;10:84-90.
22. Hickok G, Love T, Swinney D, Wong EC, Buxton RB. Functional MR Imaging during auditory word perception: A single-trial presentation paradigm. Brain Lang 1997;58:197-201.
23. Blamire AM, Ogawa S, Urgurbil K, Rothman D, McCarthy G, Ellerman JM, Hyder F, Rattner Z, Shulman RG. Dynamic mapping of the human visual cortex by high-speed magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:11069-11073.
24. Hall DA, Summerfield AQ, Haggard MP, Akeroyd MA, Elliott MR, Bowtell RW. A parametric fMRI study of the auditory response to stimulus intensity. NeuroImage 1999;9:S782.
25. Dale AM, Buckner RL. Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI. Hum Brain Mapping 1997;5:329-340.