Design choices in imaging speech comprehension: An Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analysis

NeuroImage

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1601-1613

  Adank, Patti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

FMRI; Meta analysis; Methodology; Neuroimaging; PET; Speech comprehension

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; LANGUAGE; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; NARRATIVE; NEUROIMAGING; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTIC MEMORY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL SULCUS; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; WORD RECOGNITION;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84866270930     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.027     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Adank P. The neural bases of difficult speech comprehension and speech production and their overlap: two Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses. Brain Lang. 2012, 122(1):42-54.
2. Adank P., Devlin J.T. On-line plasticity in spoken sentence comprehension: adapting to time-compressed speech. Neuroimage 2010, 49(1):1124-1132.
3. Adank P., Davis M., Hagoort P. Neural dissociation in processing noise and accent in spoken language comprehension. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50(1):77-84.
4. Alario F.X., Chainay H., Lehericy S., Cohen L. The role of the supplementary motor area (SMA) in word production. Brain Res. 2006, 1076(1):129-143.
5. Allen P.P., Amaro E., Fu C.H.Y., Williams S.C.R., Brammer M., Johns L.C., et al. Neural correlates of the misattribution of self-generated speech. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2005, 26:44-53.
6. Awad M., Warren J.E., Scott S.K., Turkheimer F.E., Wise R.J.S. A common system for the comprehension and production of narrative speech. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27(43):11455-11464.
7. Bandettini P.A., Jesmanowicz A., van Kylen J., Birn R.M., Hyde J.S. Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998, 39(3):410-416.
8. Binder J.R., Frost J.A., Hammeke T.A., Bellgowan P.S., Springer J.A., Kaufman J.N., et al. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cereb. Cortex 2000, 10(0):512-528.
9. Binder J.R., Swanson S.J., Hammeke T.A., Sabsevitz D.S. A comparison of five fMRI protocols for mapping speech comprehension systems. Epilepsia 2008, 49(12):1980-1997.
10. Blesser B. Speech perception under conditions of spectral transformation. I. Phonetic characteristics. J. Speech Hear. Res. 1972, 15:5-41.
11. Bozic M., Tyler L.K., Ives D.T., Randall B., Marslen-Wilson W.D. Bihemispheric foundations for human speech comprehension. PNAS 2010, 107(40):17439-17444.
12. Christensen T.A., Antonucci S.M., Lockwood J.L., Kittleson M., Plante E. Cortical and subcortical contributions to the attentive processing of speech. Neuroreport 2008, 19(11):1101-1105.
13. Constable R.T., Pugh K.R., Berroya E., Mencl W.E., Westerveld M., Ni W., et al. Sentence complexity and input modality effects in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2004, 22(1):11-21.
14. Crinion J.T., Lambon-Ralph M.A., Warburton E.A., Howard D., Wise R.S.J. Temporal lobe regions engaged during normal speech comprehension. Brain 2003, 126(5):1193-1201.
15. Dapretto M., Bookheimer S.Y. Form and content: dissociating syntax and semantics in sentence comprehension. Neuron 1999, 24:427-432.
16. Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S. Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23(8):3423-3431.
17. Davis M.H., Ford M.A., Kherif F., Johnsrude I.S. Does semantic context benefit speech understanding through "top-down" processes? Evidence from time-resolved sparse fMRI. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23(12):3914-3932.
18. Desmond J.E., Glover G.H. Estimating sample size in functional MRI (fMRI) neuroimaging studies: statistical power analyses. J. Neurosci. Methods 2002, 118(2):115-128.
19. Devauchelle A., Oppenheim C., Rizzi L., Dehaene S., Pallier C. Sentence syntax and content in the human temporal lobe: an fMRI adaptation study in auditory and visual modalities. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 21(5):1000-1012.
20. Devlin J.T., Russell R.P., Davis M.H., Price C.J., Wilson J., Moss H.E., et al. Susceptibility-induced loss of signal: comparing PET and fMRI on a semantic task. Neuroimage 2000, 11(6 Pt 1):589-600.
21. Dick F., Saygin A.P., Galati G., Pitzalis S., Bentrovato S., D'Amico S., et al. What is involved and what is necessary for complex linguistic and nonlinguistic auditory processing: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging and lesion data. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2007, 19(5):799-816.
22. Eickhoff S.B., Heim S., Zilles K., Amunts K. A systems perspective on the effective connectivity of overt speech production. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 2009, 367(1896):2399-2421.
23. Eickhoff S.B., Bzdok D., Laird A., Roski C., Caspers S., Zilles K., et al. Co-activation patterns distinguish cortical modules, their connectivity and functional differentiation. Neuroimage 2011, 57:938-949.
24. Eisner F., McGettigan C., Faulkner A., Rosen S., Scott S.K. Inferior frontal gyrus activation predicts individual differences in perceptual learning of cochlear-implant simulations. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30(21):4040-4049.
25. Embleton K.V., Haroon H.A., Morris D.M., Lambon-Ralph M.A., Parker G.J. Distortion correction for diffusion-weighted MRI tractography and fMRI in the temporal lobes. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2010, 31:1570-1587.
26. Flanagan J.L. Speech Analysis, Synthesis and Perception 1972, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 2nd ed.
27. Friederici A.D., Kotz S.A., Scott S.K., Obleser J. Disentangling syntax and intelligibility in auditory language comprehension. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2010, 31(3):448-457.
28. Gagnepain P., Chetelat G., Landeau B., Dayan J., Eustache F., Lebreton K. Spoken word memory traces within the human auditory cortex revealed by repetition priming and functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28(20):5281-5289.
29. Giraud A.L., Kell C., Thierfelder C., Sterzer P., Russ M.O., Preibisch C., et al. Contributions of sensory input, auditory search and verbal comprehension to cortical activity during speech processing. Cereb. Cortex 2004, 14(3):247-255.
30. Gonzalez-Castillo J., Talavage T. Reproducibility of fMRI activations associated with auditory sentence comprehension. Neuroimage 2011, 54(3):2138-2155.
31. Hall D.A., Haggard M.P., Akeroyd M.A., Palmer A.R., Summerfield A.Q., Elliot M.R., et al. "Sparse" temporal sampling in auditory fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1999, 7:213-223.
32. Heinrich A., Carlyon R.P., Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S. Illusory vowels resulting from perceptual continuity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:1737-1752.
33. Hickok G., Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8:393-402.
34. Hickok G., Houde J., Rong F. Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: computational basis and neural organization. Neuron 2011, 69:407-422.
35. Holle H., Obleser J., Rueschemeyer S.A., Gunter T.C. Integration of iconic gestures and speech in left superior temporal areas boosts speech comprehension under adverse listening conditions. Neuroimage 2010, 49(1):875-884.
36. Ischebeck A.K., Friederici A.D., Alter K. Processing prosodic boundaries in natural and hummed speech: an FMRI study. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18(3):541-552.
37. Jacquemot C., Pallier C., LeBihan D., Dehaene S., Dupoux E. Phonological grammar shapes the auditory cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23(29):9541-9546.
38. Jardri R., Pins D., Bubrovszky M., Despretz P., Pruvo J.P., Steinling M., et al. Self awareness and speech processing: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2007, 35(4):1645-1653.
39. Kalikow D.N., Stevens K.N., Elliott L.L. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1977, 61(5):1337-1351.
40. Klein E., Moeller K., Nuerk H.C., Willmes K. On the neuro-cognitive foundations of basic auditory number processing: an fMRI study. Behav. Brain Funct. 2010, 6:42.
41. Kotz S.A., Cappa S.F., von Cramon D.Y., Friederici A.D. Modulation of the lexical-semantic network by auditory semantic priming: an event-related functional MRI study. Neuroimage 2002, 17(4):1761-1772.
42. Kovelman I., Baker S.A., Petitto L.A. Bilingual and monolingual brains compared: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of syntactic processing and a possible "neural signature" of bilingualism. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20(1):153-169.
43. Laird A.R., Fox P.M., Price C.J., Glahn D.C., Uecker A.M., Lancaster J.L., et al. ALE meta-analysis: controlling the false discovery rate and performing statistical contrasts. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2005, 25:155-164.
44. Leff A.P., Schofield T.M., Stephan K.E., Crinion J.T., Friston K.J., Price C.J. The cortical dynamics of intelligible speech. J. Neurosci. 2009, 28(49):13209-13215.
45. Liberman A.M., Cooper F.S., Shankweiler D., Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychol. Rev. 1967, 74:431-461.
46. Liebenthal E., Binder J.R., Spitzer S.M., Possing E.T., Medler D.A. Neural substrates of phonemic perception. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:1621-1631.
47. LoCasto P.C., Krebs-Noble D., Gullapalli R.P., Burton M.W. An fMRI investigation of speech and tone segmentation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2004, 16(9):1612-1624.
48. Love T., Haist F., Nicol J., Swinney D. A functional neuroimaging investigation of the role of structural complexity and task-demand during auditory sentence processing. Cortex 2006, 42(4):577-590.
49. Mazoyer B.M., Tzourio N., Frak V., Syrota A., Murayama N., Levrier D. The cortical representation of speech. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1993, 5:467-479.
50. McGettigan C., Evans S., Rosen S., Agnew Z.K., Shah P., Scott S.K. An application of univariate and multivariate approaches in FMRI to quantifying the hemispheric lateralization of acoustic and linguistic processes. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 24:636-652.
51. McGettigan C., Warren J.E., Eisner F., Marshall C.R., Shanmugalingam P., Scott S.K. Neural Correlates of Sublexical Processing in Phonological Working Memory. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 23(4):961-977.
52. Meyer M., Alter K., Friederici A.D., Lohmann G., von Cramon D.Y. FMRI reveals brain regions mediating slow prosodic modulations in spoken sentences. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2002, 17(2):73-88.
53. Mitchell R.L.C. How does the brain mediate interpretation of incongruent auditory emotions?. The neural response to prosody in the presence of conflicting lexico-semantic cues. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2006, 24:3611-3618.
54. Mitchell R.L., Elliott R., Barry M., Cruttenden A., Woodruff P.W. The neural response to emotional prosody, as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41(10):1410-1421.
55. Narain C., Scott S.K., Wise R.J.S., Rosen S., Leff A., Iversen S.D., et al. Defining a left-lateralized response specific to intelligible speech using fMRI. Cereb. Cortex 2003, 13(12):1362-1368.
56. Newman S.D., Just M.A., Keller T.A., Roth J., Carpenter P.A. Differential effects of syntactic and semantic processing on the subregions of Broca's area. Cogn. Brain Res. 2003, 16:297-307.
57. Obleser J., Kotz S.A. Expectancy constraints in degraded speech modulate the language comprehension network. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:633-640.
58. Obleser J., Wise R.J.S., Dresner M.A., Scott S.K. Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:2283-2289.
59. Obleser J., Eisner F., Kotz S.A. Bilateral speech comprehension reflects differential sensitivity to spectral and temporal features. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28(32):8116-8123.
60. Obleser J., Meyer L., Friederici A.D. Dynamic assignment of neural resources in auditory comprehension of complex sentences. Neuroimage 2011, 56(4):2310-2320.
61. Okada K., Hickok G. Identification of lexical-phonological networks in the superior temporal sulcus using fMRI. Neuroreport 2006, 17:1293-1296.
62. Okada K., Rong F., Venezia J., Matchin W., Hsieh I.H., Saberi K., et al. Hierarchical organization of human auditory cortex: evidence from acoustic invariance in the response to intelligible speech. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20(10):2486-2495.
63. Orfanidou E., Marslen-Wilson W.D., Davis M.H. Neural response suppression predicts repetition priming of spoken words and pseudowords. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:1237-1252.
64. Peelle J.E., McMillan C., Moore P., Grossman M., Wingfield A. Dissociable patterns of brain activity during comprehension of rapid and syntactically complex speech: evidence from fMRI. Brain Lang. 2004, 91:315-325.
65. Peelle J.E., Eason R.J., Schmitter S., Schwarzbauer C., Davis M.H. Evaluating an acoustically quiet EPI sequence for use in fMRI studies of speech and auditory processing. Neuroimage 2010, 52(4):1410-1419.
66. Peelle J.E., Johnsrude I.S., Davis M.H. Hierarchical processing for speech in human auditory cortex and beyond. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2010, 4:1-3.
67. Pickering M.J., Garrod S. Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11(3):105-110.
68. Raettig T., Kotz S.A. Auditory processing of different types of pseudo-words: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 2008, 39:1420-1428.
69. Rauschecker J.P., Scott S.K. Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12(6):718-724.
70. Rimol L.M., Specht K., Hugdahl K. Controlling for individual differences in fMRI brain activation to tones, syllables, and words. Neuroimage 2006, 30(2):554-562.
71. Rissman J., Eliassen J.C., Blumstein S.E. An event-related FMRI investigation of implicit semantic priming. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2003, 15(8):1160-1175.
72. Rodd J.M., Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S. The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15(8):1261-1269.
73. Rodd J.M., Longe O.L., Randall B., Tyler L.K. The functional organisation of the fronto-temporal language system: evidence from syntactic and semantic ambiguity. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(5):1324-1335.
74. Röder B., Stock O., Neville H., Bien S., Rosler F. Brain activation modulated by the comprehension of normal and pseudo-word sentences of different processing demands: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroimage 2002, 15:1003-1014.
75. Schirmer A., Zysset S., Kotz S.A., Yves von Cramon D. Gender differences in the activation of inferior frontal cortex during emotional speech perception. Neuroimage 2004, 21(3):1114-1123.
76. Schön D., Gordon R., Campagne A., Magne C., Astesano C., Anton J.L., et al. Similar cerebral networks in language, music and song perception. Neuroimage 2010, 51(1):450-461.
77. Schroeder M.R. Reference signal for signal quality studies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1968, 44:1735-1736.
78. Scott S.K., Johnsrude I.S. The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends Neurosci. 2003, 26:100-107.
79. Scott S.K., Blank S.C., Rosen S., Wise R.J.S. Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain 2000, 123(12):2400-2406.
80. Scott S.K., Rosen S., Lang H., Wise R.J.S. Neural correlates of intelligibility in speech investigated with noise vocoded speech-a positron emission tomography study. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006, 120(2):1075-1083.
81. Scott S.K., McGettigan C., Eisner F. A little less action a little more conversation - candidate roles for the motor cortex in speech perception. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10:295-302.
82. Shah N.J., Jäncke L., Grosse-Ruyken M.L., Muller-Gartner H.W. Influence of acoustic masking noise in fMRI of the auditory cortex during phonetic discrimination. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999, 9(1):19-25.
83. Shannon R.V., Zeng F.G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 1995, 270:303-304.
84. Shuster L.I. The effect of sublexical and lexical frequency on speech production: an fMRI investigation. Brain Lang. 2009, 111(1):66-72.
85. Shuster L.I., Lemieux S.K. An fMRI investigation of covertly and overtly produced mono- and multisyllabic words. Brain Lang. 2005, 93(1):20-31.
86. Skipper J.I., Nusbaum H.C., Small S.L. Listening to talking faces: motor cortical activation during speech perception. Neuroimage 2005, 25:76-89.
87. Skipper J.I., Nusbaum H.C., Small S.L. Lending a helping hand to hearing: another motor theory of speech perception. Action to Language Via the Mirror Neuron System 2006, 250-285. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: MA. M.A. Arbib (Ed.).
88. Soros P., Sokoloff L.G., Bose A., McIntosh A.R., Graham S.J., Stuss D.T. Clustered functional MRI of overt speech production. Neuroimage 2006, 32(1):376-387.
89. Stevenson R.A., James T.W. Audiovisual integration in human superior temporal sulcus: inverse effectiveness and the neural processing of speech and object recognition. Neuroimage 2009, 44:1210-1223.
90. Takeichi H., Koyama S., Terao A., Takeuchi F., Toyosawa Y., Murohashi H. Comprehension of degraded speech sounds with m-sequence modulation: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2010, 49(3):2697-2706.
91. Thompson-Schill S.L., D'Esposito M., Aguirre G.K., Farah M.J. Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a re-evaluation. PNAS 1997, 94:14792-14797.
92. Tracy J., Flanders A., Madi S., Natale P., Delvecchio N., Pyrros A., et al. The brain's response to incidental intruded words during focal text processing. Neuroimage 2003, 18(1):117-126.
93. Turkeltaub P.E., Coslett H.B. Localization of sublexical speech perception components. Brain Lang. 2010, 114:1-15.
94. Turkeltaub P.E., Eden G.F., Jones K.M., Zeffiro T.A. Meta_analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single word reading: method and validation. Neuroimage 2002, 16:765-780.
95. Tyler L.K., Shafto M.A., Randall B., Wright P., Marslen-Wilson W.D., Stamatakis E.A. Preserving syntactic processing across the adult life span: the modulation of the frontotemporal language system in the context of age-related atrophy. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20(2):352-364.
96. Wildgruber D., Hertrich I., Riecker A., Erb M., Anders S., Grodd W., et al. Distinct frontal regions subserve evaluation of linguistic and emotional aspects of speech intonation. Cereb. Cortex 2004, 14(12):1384-1389.
97. Wilson S.M., Molnar-Szakacs I., Iacoboni M. Beyond superior temporal cortex: intersubject correlations in narrative speech comprehension. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18(1):230-242.
98. Wong P.C.M., Uppanda A.K., Parrish T.B., Dhar S. Cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2008, 51:1026-1041.
99. Xiao Z., Zhang J.X., Wang X., Wu R., Hu X., Weng X., et al. Differential activity in left inferior frontal gyrus for pseudowords and real words: an event-related fMRI study on auditory lexical decision. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2005, 25:212-221.
100. Xu J., Kemeny S., Park G., Frattali C., Braun A. Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension. Neuroimage 2005, 25(3):1002-1015.
101. Zaehle T., Geiser E., Alter K., Jancke L., Meyer M. Segmental processing in the human auditory dorsal stream. Brain Res. 2008, 1220:179-190.
102. Zekveld A.A., Heslenfeld D.J., Festen J.M., Schoonhoven R. Top-down and bottom-up processes in speech comprehension. Neuroimage 2006, 32(4):1826-1836.