Consanguineous mating, specialization, and the environment: How multiple variable interactions affect the evolution of dioecy

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 100, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1038-1049

  Sinclair, Jordan P ^a   Maxwell, Glenn D ^a   Carl Freeman, D ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolution of dioecy; Inbreeding depression; Mating systems

Indexed keywords

DIOECY; DISPERSAL; INBREEDING; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; INVASIBILITY; INVASIVE SPECIES; MATING SUCCESS; PLANT COMMUNITY; SPECIALIZATION;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; EVOLUTION OF DIOECY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; INBREEDING; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MATING SYSTEMS; PLANT; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; SEX DETERMINATION PROCESS;

EVOLUTION OF DIOECY; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MATING SYSTEMS;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; INBREEDING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; PLANTS; SEX DETERMINATION PROCESSES;

EID: 84878823421     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1200579     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Ashman, T. L. 1994. Reproductive allocation in hermaphrodite and female plants of Sidalcea oregana ssp. spicata (Malvaceae) using four currencies. American Journal of Botany 81: 433-438.
2. Ashman, T. L. 1999. Determinants of sex allocation in a gynodioecious wild strawberry: Implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12: 648-661.
3. Ashman, T. L. 2006. The evolution of separate sexes: A focus on the ecological context. In L. D. Harder and S. C. H. Barrett [eds], The ecology and evolution of flowers, 204-222. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
4. Austerlitz F C., W. Dick, C Dutech, E. K. Klein, S. Oddou-Muratorio, P E Smouse and V L Sork. 2004. Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Molecular Ecology 13: 937-954.
5. Ballou, J. 1983. Calculating inbreeding coefficients from pedigrees In C. M. Schonewald-Cox, S. M. Chambers, B. MacBryde, and L. Thomas [eds.], Genetics and conservation: A reference for managing wild animal and plant populations, 509-520. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing, Menlo Park, California, USA.
6. Barrett, S. C. H. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Reviews Genetics 3: 274-284.
7. Barrett, S. C. H., and D Charlesworth. 1991. Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature 352: 522-524.
8. Bartish I V, N. Jeppsson and H Nybom. 1999. Population genetic structure in the dioecious pioneer plant species Hippophae rham-noides investigated by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Molecular Ecology 8: 791-802.
9. Bawa K. S. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 15-39.
10. Burton, J. W., and C Brownie. 2006. Heterosis and inbreeding depression in two soybean single crosses. Crop Science 46: 2643-2648.
11. Case M. A. 1994. Extensive variation in the levels of genetic diversity and degree of relatedness among five species of Cypripedium (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 175-184.
12. Cavers, P. B. 1983. Seed demography. Canadian Journal of Botany 61: 3578-3590.
13. Charlesworth B., and D Charlesworth. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist 112: 975-997.
14. Charlesworth, D. 2006. Evolution of plant breeding systems. Current Biology 16: R726-R735.
15. Cox, P. A. 1981. Niche partitioning between sexes of dioecious plants. American Naturalist 17: 295-307.
16. Crnokrak P and D. A. Roff. 1998. The genetic basis of the tradeoff between calling and wing morph in males of the cricket Gryllus firmus. Evolution 52: 1111-1118.
17. Darwin, C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. Murray, London, UK.
18. DeJong T J and S. A. H. Geritz. 2002. The role of geitonogamy in the gradual evolution towards dioecy in cosexual plants. Selection 2: 133-146.
19. DeJong, T. J., F. H. D. Van Battenburg and J Van Dijk. 2002. Seed sex ratio in dioecious plants depends on relative dispersal of pollen and seeds: An example using a chessboard simulation model. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 373-379.
20. DeJong, T. J., N. M. Waser and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 1993. Geitonogamy: The neglected side of selfing. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8: 321-325.
21. D elph, L. F., L. F. Galloway and M. L. Stanton. 1996. Sexual dimorphism in flower size. American Naturalist 148: 299-320.
22. Eckert, C. G., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1994. Inbreeding depression in partially self-fertilizing Decondon verticillatus (Lythraceae): Population-genetic and experimental analysis. Evolution 48: 952-964.
23. Eckhart, V. M. 1992. Resource compensation and the evolution of gynodioecy in Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Evolution 46: 1313-1328.
24. Eriksson G, A Jonsson and D Lindgren. 1973. Flowering in a clonal trial of Picea abies Karst. Studia Forestalia Suecica 110: 5-45.
25. Fleming, T. H., S. Maurice, S. L. Buchmann and M. D. Tuttle. 1994. Reproductive biology and relative male and female fitness in a trioe-cious cactus, Pachycereus pringlei (Cactaceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 858-867.
26. Freeman, D. C., J. Lovett Doust, A El-Keblawy, K. J. Miglia and E. D. McArthur. 1997. Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy. Botanical Review 63: 65-92.
27. Freeman, D. C., E. D. McArthur and K T H arper. 1984. The adaptive significance of sexual lability in plants using Atriplex canescens as a principal example. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 71: 265-277.
28. F reeman, D. C., E. D. McArthur, S. C. Sanderson and A. R. Tiedemann 1993. Influence of topography on cumulative pollen flow in fourwing saltbrush. Research Note INT-413, USDA Intermountain Research Station, Provo, Utah, USA.
29. Freeman, D. C., and J. J. Vitale. 1985. The influence of environment on the sex ratio and fitness of spinach. Botanical Gazette 146: 137-142.
30. Fromhage L and H Kokko. 2010. Spatial seed and pollen games: Dispersal, sex allocation, and the evolution of dioecy. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23: 1947-1956.
31. Givnish, T. J. 1980. Ecological constrains on the evolution of breeding systems in seed plants: Dioecy and dispersal in gymnosperms. Evolution 34: 959-972.
32. Grant S, B Hunkirchen and H Saedler. 1994. Developmental differences between male and female flowers in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. Plant Journal 6: 471-480.
33. Guibert C, L Civeyrel and P Linder. 2009. Male and female separation event trapped in a species tree. Taxon 58: 172-180.
34. Heilbuth, J. C., K. L. Ilves and S. P. Otto. 2001. The consequences of dioecy for seed dispersal: Modeling the seed-shadow handicap. Evolution 55: 880-888.
35. Huang, S. Q., S. G. Sun, Y Takahashi and Y H Guo. 2002. Gender variation of sequential inflorescences in a monoecious plant Sagittaria trifolia (Alismataceae). Annals of Botany 90: 613-622.
36. Hull-Sanders, H. M., M. D. Eubanks and D. E. Carr. 2005. Inbreeding depression and selfing rate of Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula (Convolvulaceae). American Journal of Botany 92: 1871-1877.
37. Kariyat, R. R., K. E. Mauck, C. M. DeMoraes, A G Stephenson and M. C. Mesher. 2012. Inbreeding alters volatile signaling phenotypes and influences tri-trophic interactions in horsenettle (Solanum caro-linense L.). Ecology Letters 15: 301-309.
38. Kariyat, R.R., S.R. Scanlon, M C Mescher, C M De Moraes and A G. Stephenson. 2011. Inbreeding depression in Solanum carolinense (Solanaceae) under field conditions and implications for mating system evolution. PLoS ONE 6: e28459.
39. K arkkainen K., V. Koski and O. Savolainen. 1996. Geographical variation in the inbreeding depression of Scots pine. Evolution 50: 111-119.
40. Klein, E. K., C. Lavigne H Picault M Renard and P. H. Gouyon 2006. Pollen dispersal of oilseed rape: Estimation of the dispersal functions and effects of field dimension. Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 141-151.
41. Kohn, J. R. 1989. Sex ratio, seed production, biomass allocation, and the cost of male function in Cucurbita foetidissima HBK (Cucurbitaceae). Evolution 43: 1424-1434.
42. Lewis, D. 1942. The evolution of sex in flowering plants. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 17: 46-67.
43. Lloyd, D. G. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45: 325-339.
44. Lloyd, D. G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist 113: 67-79.
45. Liu Z, P H Moore, H., Ma, Ackerman H, Ragiba M, Q. Y u, H.M. Pearl et al. 2004. A primitive Y chromosome in papaya marks incipient sex chromosome evolution. Nature 427: 348-352.
46. Mena-Ali, J. I., L. H. Keser and A. G. Stephenson. 2008. Inbreeding depression in Solanum carolinense (Solanaceae), a species with a plastic self-incompatibility response. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 10.
47. Ornduff R. 1966. The origin of dioecism from heterostyly in Nymphoides (Menyanthaceae). Evolution 20: 309-314.
48. Pannell, J. R. 2002. The evolution and maintenance of androdioecy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 397-425.
49. Pannell, J. R., and M Verdu. 2006. The evolution of gender specialization from dimorphic hermaphroditism: Paths from heterodichogamy to gynodioecy and androdioecy. Evolution 60: 660-673.
50. Poot, P. 1997. Reproductive allocation and resource compensation in male-sterile and hermaphroditic plants of Plantago lancelata (Plantaginaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 1256-1265.
51. Ramsey M and G Vaughton. 2001. Sex expression and sexual dimorphism in subdioecious Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 589-597.
52. Remington, D. L., and D. M. O'Malley. 2000. Whole-genome characterization of embryonic stage inbreeding depression in a selfed loblolly pine family. Genetics 155: 337-348.
53. Renner, S. S., and R E Ricklefs. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in flow-ering plants. American Journal of Botany 82: 596-606.
54. Renner, S. S., and H. Won. 2001. Repeated evolution of dioecy from mo-noecy in Siparunaceae (Laurales). Systematic Biology 50: 700-712.
55. Richards, C. M. 2000. Inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a plant metapopulation. American Naturalist 155: 383-394.
56. Schemske, D. W., and R Lande. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations. Evolution 39: 41-52.
57. S inclair, J. P., J Emlen and D. C. Freeman. 2011. Biased sex ratios in plants: Theory and trends. Botanical Review 78: 63-86.
58. Spigler, R. B., K. S. Lewers, D S Main and T L Ashman. 2008. Genetic mapping of sex determination in a wild strawberry, Fragaria virginiana, reveals earliest form of sex chromosome. Heredity 101: 507-517.
59. Thomson, J. D., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1981. Selection for outcrossing, sexual selection, and the evolution of dioecy in plants. American Naturalist 118: 443-449.
60. Torices R, M Mendez and J. M. Gomez. 2011. Where do monomorphic sexual systems fit in the evolution of dioecy? Insights from the largest family of angiosperms. New Phytologist 190: 234-248.
61. Wallace, C. S., and P. W. Rundel. 1979. Sexual dimorphism and resource allocation in male and female shrubs of Simmondsia chinensis. Oecologia 44: 34-39.
62. Webb, C. J. 1979. Breeding systems and the evolution of dioecy in New Zealand apioid Umbelliferae. Evolution 33: 662-672.
63. Yakimowski S. B., M. Glaettli and S. C. H. Barrett. 2011. Floral dimorphism in plant populations with combined versus separate sexes. Annals of Botany 108: 765-776.