Gender variation of sequential inflorescences in a monoecious plant Sagittaria trifolia (Alismataceae)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 90, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 613-622

  Huang, Shuang Quan ^a,b   Sun, Shi Guo ^a   Takahashi, Yoshitaka ^b   Guo, You Hao ^a  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER FOR WESTERN REGION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dichogamy; Dioecy; Gender variation; Monoecy; Pollination; Sagittaria trifolia; Seed production; Sequential inflorescences

Indexed keywords

FLOWERING; MONOECY; POLLINATION; SEED PRODUCTION; SEX ALLOCATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARROWHEAD; ARTICLE; FLOWER; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; REPRODUCTION; SEX RATIO;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FLOWERS; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; SAGITTARIA; SEEDS; SEX RATIO;

CHINA;

ALISMATACEAE; SAGITTARIA; SAGITTARIA TRIFOLIA;

EID: 0036843176     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcf236     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Barrett SCH, Baker AM, Jesson LK. 2000. Mating strategies in monocotyledons. In: Wilson KL, Morrison DA, eds. Systematics and evolution of monocots. Sydney: CSIRO Publishing, 256-267.
2. Barrett SCH, Dorken ME, Case AL. 2001. A geographical context for the evolution of plant reproductive systems. In: Silvertown J, Antonovics J, eds. Integrating Ecology and Evolution in a Spatial Context. Oxford: Blackwell, 341-364.
3. Bawa KS, Beach JH. 1981. Evolution of sexual systems in flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 62: 254-274.
4. Bertin RI. 1993. Incidence of monoecy and dichogamy in relation to self-fertilization in angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 80: 557-560.
5. Bogin C. 1955. Revision of the genus Sagittaria (Alismataceae). Memoirs of the New York Botanic Garden 9: 179-233.
6. Brunet J. 1996. Male reproductive success and variation in fruit and seed set in Aquilegia caerulea (Ranunculaceae). Ecology 77: 2458-2471.
7. Brunet J, Charlesworth D. 1995. Floral sex allocation in sequentially blooming plants. Evolution 49: 70-79.
8. Charnov EL. 1982. The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9. Chen JK. 1989. Systematic and evolutionary studies on Sagittaria from China. Wuhan, China: Wuhan University Press.
10. Clay K. 1993. Size-dependent gender change in green dragon (Arisaema dracontium; Araceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 769-777.
11. Darwin C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. London: John Murray.
12. de Jong PC. 1976. Flowering and sex expression in Acer L. A biosystematic study. Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen 76-2: 1-201.
13. Delesalle VA, Muenchow GE. 1992. Opportunities for selfing and inbreeding depression in Sagittaria congeners (Alismataceae) with contrasting sexual systems. Evolutionary Trends in Plants 6: 81-91.
14. Dorken ME, Friedman J, Barrett SCH. 2002. The evolution and maintenance of monoecy and dioecy in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). Evolution 56: 31-41.
15. Freeman DC, Doust JL, El-Keblawy A, Miglia KJ, McArthur ED. 1997. Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy. Botanical Review 63: 65-92.
16. Fox JF. 1993. Size and sex allocation in monoecious woody plants. Oecologia 94: 110-113.
17. Harder LD, Barrett SCH, Cole WW. 2000. The mating consequences of sexual segregation within inflorescences of flowering plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B 267: 315-320.
18. Huang SQ, Jin BF, Wang QF, Guo YH. 1999. Floral display and pollen flow in a natural population of Sagittaria trifolia. Acta Botanica Sinica 41: 726-730.
19. Huang SQ, Song N, Wang Q, Tang LL, Wang XF. 2000. Sex expression and the evolutionary advantages of male flowers in an andromonoecious species, Sagittaria guyanensis subsp, lappula (Alismataceae). Acta Botanica Sinica 42: 1108-1114.
20. Lloyd DG. 1980a. A quantitative method for describing the gender of plants. Sexual strategies in plants. New Zealand Journal of Botany 18: 103-108.
21. Lloyd DG. 1980b. The distribution of gender in four angiosperm species illustrating two evolutionary pathways to dioecy. Evolution 34: 123-134.
22. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. New Zealand Journal of Botany 24: 135-162.
23. Méndez M. 1998. Modification of phenotypic and functional gender in the monoecious Arum italicum (Araceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 225-234.
24. Muenchow GE. 1998. Subandrodioecy and male fitness in Sagittaria lancifolia subsp. lancifolia (Alismataceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 513-520.
25. Muenchow GE, Delesalle VA. 1994. Pollinators response to male floral display size in two Sagittaria (Alismataceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 568-573.
26. Pellmyr O. 1987. Multiple sex expression in Cimicifuga simplex: Dichogamy destabilizes hermaphroditism. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 31: 161-174.
27. Sakai AK, Weller SG. 1999. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants: A review of terminology, biogeographic patterns, ecological correlates, and phylogenetic approaches. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF, eds. Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1-31.
28. Sarkissian TS, Barrett SCH, Harder LD. 2001. Gender variation in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae): Is size all that matters? Ecology 82: 360-373.
29. SAS. 1998. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
30. Thomson JD, Barrett SCH. 1981. Temporal variation of gender in Aralia hispida (Araliaceae). Evolution 35: 1094-1107.
31. Thomson JD, Brunet J. 1990. Hypotheses for the evolution of dioecy in seed plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5: 11-16.
32. Wooten JW. 1971. The monoecious and dioecious conditions in Sagittaria latifolia L. (Alismataceae). Evolution 25: 549-553.
33. Wyatt R. 1983. Pollinator-plant interactions and the evolution of breeding systems. In: Real L, ed. Pollination Biology. London: Academic Press, 51-95.