Perception Isn't So Simple: Commentary on Bernard, Gervais, Allen, Campomizzi, and Klein (2012)

Psychological Science

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1069-1070

  Tarr, Michael J ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878810510     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797612474669     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bernard P.,Gervais S. J.,Allen J.,Campomizzi S.,Klein O.Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis.Psychological Science. 2012;23:469-471.
2. Bertamini M.,Munafo R.Bite-size science and its undesired side effects.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:67-71.
3. Biederman I.,Bar M.One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects.Vision Research. 1999;39:2885-2899.
4. Folk M. D.,Luce R. D.Effects of stimulus complexity on mental rotation rate of polygons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1987;13:395-404.
5. Gauthier I.,Behrmann M.,Tarr M. J.Can face recognition really be dissociated from object recognition?.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1999;11:349-370.
6. Hayward W. G.,Tarr M. J.Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1997;23:1511-1521.
7. Hayward W. G.,Tarr M. J.Differing views on views: Comments on Biederman and Bar (1999).Vision Research. 2000;40:3895-3899.
8. Jolicoeur P.,Milliken B.Identification of disoriented objects: Effects of context of prior presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1989;15:200-210.
9. Lawson R.,Humphreys G. W.View specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1996;22:395-416.
10. Ledgerwood A.,Sherman W.Short, sweet, and problematic? The rise of the short report in psychological science.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:60-66.
11. Rossion B.Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception.Acta Psychologica. 2008;128:274-289.
12. Shepard R. N.,Cooper L. A.Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1982:.
13. Tarr M. J.,Bülthoff H. H.,Zabinski M.,Blanz V.To what extent do unique parts influence recognition across changes in viewpoint?.Psychological Science. 1997;8:282-289.
14. Tarr M. J.,Pinker S.Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition.Cognitive Psychology. 1989;21:233-282.
15. Tarr M. J.,Pinker S.When does human object recognition use a viewer-centered reference frame?.Psychological Science. 1990;1:253-256.
16. Yin R. K.Looking at upside-down faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1969;81:141-145.