Measuring social desirability responding. A short version of Paulhus' BIDR 6

TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 117-135

  Bobbio, Andrea ^a   Manganelli, Anna Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

BIDR; Impression management; Self deceptive enhancement; Short version; Social desirability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878800292     PISSN: 19726325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Barger, S. D. (2002). The Marlowe-Crowne affair: Short forms, psychometric structure, and social desirability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 79, 286-305. (Pubitemid 35239220)
2. Bobbio, A., Fochesato, M., Manganelli Rattazzi, A. M., & Crivellari, F. (2005). La scala di controllo sociopolitico di Zimmerman e Zahniser (SPCS, 1991). Un contributo all'adattamento italiano con metodi carta e matita e Web-based [The Zimmerman and Zahniser' Sociopolitical Control Scale (SPCS, 1991). A contribution to the adaptation to the Italian context using paper-and-pencil and Web-based forms]. TPM, 12, 61-82.
3. Bobbio, A., Manganelli Rattazzi, A. M., & Zorzan, A. (2008). Measuring psychological empowerment in the workplace. A test of Spreitzer's model. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 255, 11-20.
4. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. London-New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated Publishers.
6. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
7. Crowne, D. p., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
8. Dijkstra, W., Smit, J. H., & Comijs, H. C. (2001). Using social desirability scales in research among the elderly. Quality and Quantity, 31, 107-115.
9. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
10. Fan, X., & Thompson, B. (2003). Confidence intervals about score reliability coefficients. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Score reliability: Contemporary thinking on reliability issue (pp.69-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Ferrari, J. R., Bristow, M., & Cowman, S. (2005). Looking good or being good? The role of social desirability tendencies in student perceptions of institutional mission and values. College Student Journal, 39, 7-13.
12. Fisher, R. (2000). The future of social-desirability bias research in marketing. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 73-77.
13. Gerbing, D. W., & Hamilton, J. G. (1996). Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 62-72.
14. Gravdal, L., & Sandal, G. M. (2006). The two-factor model of social desirability: Relation to coping and defense, and implication for health. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1051-1061. (Pubitemid 43109453)
15. Hancock, D. R., & Flowers, C. (2001). Comparing social desirability responding on World Wide Web and paper-administered surveys. Educational Technology Research and Development (ETR&D), 49, 5-13. (Pubitemid 33399606)
16. Heerwig, J. A., & McCabe, B. J. (2009). Education and social desirability bias: The case of a black presidential candidate. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 674-686.
17. Helmes, E., & Holden, R. R. (2003). The construct of social desirability: One or two dimensions? Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1015-1023. (Pubitemid 36288798)
18. Holden, R. R., Book, A. S., Edwards, M. J., Wasylkiw, L., & Starzyk, K. B. (2003). Experimental faking in self-report psychopathology: Unidimensional or multidimensional? Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1107-1117. (Pubitemid 36946108)
19. Holtgraves, T. (2004). Social desirability and self-reports: Testing models of socially desirable responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 161-172. (Pubitemid 38142843)
20. Joreskog, K. J., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software Inc.
21. Krosnick, J. A. (2002). The causes of no-opinion responses to attitude measures in surveys: They are rarely what they appear to be. In R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, & R. J. A. Little (Eds.), Survey nonresponse (pp. 64-85). New York: Wiley.
22. Lalwani, A., Shavitt, S., & Johnson, T. (2006). What is the relation between cultural orientation and socially desirable responding? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 165-178. (Pubitemid 43172348)
23. Laynon, R. I., & Carle, A. C. (2007). Internal and external validity of scores on Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding and Paulhus Deception scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 859-876.
24. Leite, W. L., & Beretvas, S. N. (2005). Validation of scores on the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale and the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 140-154. (Pubitemid 40176611)
25. Levenson, H. (1974). Activism and powerful others: Distinctions within the concept of Internal-External Control. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 377-383.
26. Li, A., & Bagger, J. (2006). Using the BIDR to distinguish the effects of Impression Management and Self-Deception on the criterion validity of personality measures: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 131-141. (Pubitemid 44890952)
27. Li, A., & Bagger, J. (2007). The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR). A reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 525-544.
28. Li, A., & Reb, J. (2009). A cross-nation, cross-cultures, and cross-conditions analysis on the equivalence of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 214-233.
29. Maddi, S. R., Kobasa, S. C., & Hoover, M. (1979). An alienation test. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 19, 73-76.
30. Manganelli Rattazzi, A. M., Canova, L., & Marcorin, R. (2000). La desiderabilita sociale. Un'analisi di forme brevi della scala di Marlowe e Crowne [Social Desirability. An analysis of short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale]. TPM, 7, 5-17.
31. Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519-530.
32. Musch, J., Brockhaus, R., & Bröder, A. (2002). Ein Inventar zur Erfassung von zwei Faktoren sozialer Erwunschtheit [An inventory for the measurement of two factors of social desirability]. Diagnostica, 48, 121-129.
33. Nigro, G., & Galli, I. (1988). La fortuna, l'abilità, il caso. Introduzione allo studio del locus of control [Luck, skill, chance. Introduction to the study of Locus of Control]. Torino, IT: Centro Scientifico Torinese.
34. Nuevo, R., Montorio, I., Márquez-González, M., Cabrera, I., Izal, M., & Pérez-Rojo, G. (2009). Diferencias asociadas a la edad en el efecto de la deseabilidad social en el autoinforme del estado emocional [Age-related differences in the effect of social desirability on self-reported emotional state]. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, 44, 85-89.
35. O'Connor, B. p. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396-402.
36. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. p. Robinson, p. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37. Paulhus, D. L. (1998a). Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1197-1208. (Pubitemid 128656638)
38. Paulhus, D. L. (1998b). Paulhus Deception Scales: Users' manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health System.
39. Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 67-88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Paulhus, D. L., Harms, p. D., Bruce, M. N., & Lysy, D. C. (2003). The over-claiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 890-904. (Pubitemid 38397263)
41. Question Mark Computing Ltd. (2005). Questionmark Perception (Version 4.1). London: Question Mark Computing.
42. Ray, J. J., & Lovejoy, F. H. (2003). Age-related social desirability responding among Australian women. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 669-671. (Pubitemid 38545563)
43. Reynolds, W. N. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119-125.
44. Riketta, M. (2005) Gender and socially desirable responding as moderators of the correlation between implicit and explicit self-esteem. Current Research in Social Psychology, 11, 14-28.
45. Roccato, M. (2003). Desiderabilità sociale e acquiescenza [Social desirability and acquiescence]. Milano: LED.
46. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.
47. Scheier, M. E., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219-247.
48. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Muller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23-74. (Pubitemid 39064999)
49. Schlenker, B. R., & Britt, T. M. (1999). Beneficial impression management: Strategically controlling information to help friends. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 559-573.
50. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: Nfer-Nelson.
51. Schwartz, S. H., Verkasalo, M., Antonovsky, A., & Sagiv, L. (1997). Value priority and social desirability: Much substance, some style. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 3-18.
52. Seeman, M. (1967). On the personal consequences of alienation in work. American Sociological Review, 32, 273-285.
53. Seeman, M. (1991). Alienation and anomie. In J. p. Robinson, p. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (Vol. I, pp. 291-371). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
54. Silverstein, A. B. (1971). A corrected formula for assessing the validity of WAIS, WISC, and WPPSI short forms. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 212-213.
55. Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, T. F., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, R. L. (1996). Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 321-335. (Pubitemid 126420678)
56. Stober, J., Dette, D. E., & Musch, J. (2002). Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 370-389. (Pubitemid 34602868)
57. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
58. Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128. (Pubitemid 128458957)
59. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89-99.