Experimental faking in self-reported psychopathology: Unidimensional or multidimensional?

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1107-1117

  Holden, Ronald R ^a   Book, Angela S ^a   Edwards, Melanie J ^a   Wasylkiw, Louise ^a   Starzyk, Katherine B ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

BIDR; Faking; HPSI; Lying; PAS; PRF; Psychopathology; Social desirability

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042208272     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00321-5     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anastasi A. Psychological testing 6th ed. 1988 Macmillan New York
2. Ben-Porath Y.S. Waller N.G. "Normal" personality inventories in clinical assessment: general requirements and the potential for using the NEO Personality Inventory Psychological Assessment 4 1992 14-19
3. Brown R. Barrett P. (1999). Differences between applicant and non-applicant personality questionnaire data: some implications for the creation and use of norm tables. British Psychological Society Test User Conference Proceedings 76-86.
4. Butcher J.N. Dahlstrom W.G. Graham J.R. Tellegen A. Kaemmer B. Manual for administration and scoring of the MMPI-2 1989 University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis, MN
5. Butcher J.N. Morfitt R.C. Rouse S.V. Holden R.R. Reducing MMPI-2 defensiveness: The effect of specialized instructions on retest validity in a job applicant sample Journal of Personality Assessment 68 1997 385-401
6. Cohen J. A power primer Psychological Bulletin 112 1992 155-159
7. Crowne D.P. Marlowe D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology Journal of Consulting Psychology 24 1960 349-354
8. Edwards A.L. The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research 1957 Holt, Rinehart and Winston New York
9. Francis L.J. The dual nature of the EPQ Lie Scale among college students in England Personality and Individual Differences 12 1991 1255-1260
10. Francis L.J. Brown L.B. Pearson P.R. The dual nature of the EPQ Lie Scale among university students in Australia Personality and Individual Differences 12 1991 989-991
11. Furnham A. Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation Personality and Individual Differences 7 1986 385-400
12. Furnham A. Petrides K.V. Spencer-Bowdage S. The effects of different types of social desirability on the identification of repressors Personality and Individual Differences 33 2002 119-130
13. Gough H.G. California Personality Inventory manual 1972 Consulting Psychologists Press Palo Alto, CA
14. Hanley J.A. McNeil B.J. A method of comparing areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases Radiology 148 1983 839-843
15. Helmes E. Holden R.R. Response styles and faking on the Basic Personality Inventory Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 54 1986 853-859
16. Helmes E. Holden R.R. (in press). The construct of social desirability: one or two dimensions? Personality and Individual Differences.
17. Holden R.R. Faking and its detection on the Holden Psychological Screening Inventory Psychological Reports 76 1995 1235-1240
18. Holden R.R. Holden Psychological Screening Inventory manual 1996 Multi-Health Systems North Tonawanda, NY
19. Holden R.R. Fekken G.C. Three common social desirability scales: friends, acquaintances, or strangers? Journal of Research in Personality 23 1989 180-191
20. Holden R.R. Kroner D.G. Relative efficacy of differential response latencies for detecting faking on a self-report measure of psychopathology Psychological Assessment 4 1992 170-173
21. Holden R.R. Starzyk K.B. McLeod L.D. Edwards M.J. Comparisons among the Holden Psychological Screening Inventory (HPSI), the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) Assessment 7 2000 163-175
22. Holden R.R. Wood L.L. Tomashewski L. Do response time limitations counteract the effect of faking on personality inventory validity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 2001 160-169
23. Jackson D.N. Personality Research Form manual 3rd ed. 1984 Sigma Assessment Systems Port Huron, MI
24. Jackson D.N. Wroblewski V.R. Ashton M.C. The impact of faking on employment test validity: Does forced-choice offer a solution? Human Performance 13 2000 371-388
25. McFall R.M. Treat T.A. Quantifying the information value of clinical assessments with signal detection theory Annual Review of Psychology 50 1999 215-241
26. Meehl P.E. Hathaway S.R. The K factor as a suppressor variable in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Journal of Applied Psychology 30 1946 525-564
27. Morey L.C. Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual 1991 Psychological Assessment Resources Odessa, FL
28. Morey L.C. Personality Assessment Screener professional manual 1997 Psychological Assessment Resources Odessa, FL
29. Nichols D.S. Greene R.L. Dimensions of deception in personality assessment: the example of the MMPI-2 Journal of Personality Assessment 68 1997 251-266
30. O'Grady K.E. The Marlowe-Crowne and Edwards social desirability scales: a psychometric perspective Multivariate Behavioral Research 23 1988 87-101
31. Paulhus D.L. Two-component models of socially desirable responding Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 1984 598-609
32. Paulhus D.L. Self-deception and impression management in test responses In Angleitner A. & Wiggins J.S. (Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaires: Current issues in theory and measurement 1986 143-165 Springer-Verlag New York
33. Paulhus D.L. Measurement and control of response bias In Robinson J.P. Shaver P.R. & Wrightsman L.S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes, Vol. 1 1991 17-59 Academic Press San Diego
34. Paulhus D.L. Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS): The balanced inventory of desirable responding-7 1998 Multi-Health Systems North Tonawanda, NY
35. Paulhus D.L. Bruce M.N. Trapnell P.D. Effects of self-presentation strategies on personality profiles and their structure Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 1995 100-108
36. Pearson P.R. Francis L.J. The dual nature of the Eysenckian Lie Scales: are religious adolescents more truthful? Personality and Individual Differences 10 1989 1041-1048
37. Rogers R. Introduction In Rogers R. Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed.) 1997 1-19 Guilford Press New York
38. Rosse J.G. Stecher M.D. Miller J.L. Levin R.A. The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions Journal of Applied Psychology 83 1998 634-644
39. Sackeim H.A. Gur R.C. Self-deception, self-confrontation, and consciousness In Schwartz G.E. Shapiro D. (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation, (Vol. 2) 1978 139-197 Plenum New York
40. Schmit M.J. Ryan A.M. The Big Five in personnel selection: factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populaions Journal of Applied Psychology 78 1993 966-974
41. SPSS SPSS for Windows-Release 11.0.1 2001 SPSS Chicago
42. Wiggins J.S. Interrelationships among MMPI measures of dissimulation under standard and social desirability instructions Journal of Consulting Psychology 23 1959 419-427