The assessment of complications after spine surgery: Time for a paradigm shift?

Spine Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 615-624

  Mannion, Anne F ^a   Fekete, Tamas F ^a   O'Riordan, David ^a   Porchet, François ^a   Mutter, Urs M ^a   Jeszenszky, Dezsö ^a   Lattig, Friederike ^a   Grob, Dieter ^a   Kleinstueck, Frank S ^a  

^a SCHULTHESS CLINIC   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bothersomeness; Complications; Global treatment outcome; Satisfaction; Self assessment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BOTHERSOMENESS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORE OUTCOME MEASURES INDEX; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KIDNEY DISEASE; LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; LUNG DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SELF REPORT; SENSORY DYSFUNCTION; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPINE SURGERY; SURGEON; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL PATIENT; UROGENITAL TRACT DISEASE; WOUND HEALING IMPAIRMENT;

DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84878778165     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: 18781632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.01.047     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. P. Fritzell, O. Hagg, and A. Nordwall Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group Eur Spine J 12 2003 178 189
2. S.K. Mirza, R.A. Deyo, and P.J. Heagerty Towards standardized measurement of adverse events in spine surgery: conceptual model and pilot evaluation BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7 2006 53
3. E.J. Veen, J. Steenbruggen, and J.A. Roukema Classifying surgical complications: a critical appraisal Arch Surg 140 2005 1078 1083
4. R.A. Deyo, M. Battie, and A.J.H.M. Beurskens Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use Spine 23 1998 2003 2013
5. D.K. Sokol, and J. Wilson What is a surgical complication? World J Surg 32 2008 942 944
6. D. Grob, and A.F. Mannion The patient's perspective on complications after spine surgery Eur Spine J 18 2009 380 385
7. A.F. Mannion, T. Fekete, and F.S. Kleinstück The bothersomeness of patient self-rated "complications" reported 1 year after spine surgery Eur Spine J 21 2012 1625 1632
8. A.F. Mannion, A. Elfering, and R. Staerkle Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14 2005 1014 1026
9. A.F. Mannion, F. Porchet, and F. Kleinstück The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: part 1. The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in clinical practice Eur Spine J 18 2009 367 373
10. P. White, G. Lewith, and P. Prescott The core outcomes for neck pain: validation of a new outcome measure Spine 29 2004 1923 1930
11. M. Ferrer, F. Pellise, and O. Escudero Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain Spine 31 2006 1372 1379 discussion 80
12. S. Genevay, C. Cedraschi, and M. Marty Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in patients with low back pain Eur Spine J 21 2011 130 137
13. A.F. Mannion, M. Boneschi, and M. Teli Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index Eur Spine J 21 Suppl 6 2012 S737 S749
14. L.H. Damasceno, P.A. Rocha, and E.S. Barbosa Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the Brazilian-Portuguese language Eur Spine J 21 2012 1273 1282
15. A.W. Wu Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too BMJ 320 2000 726 727
16. N. Berlinger, and A.W. Wu Subtracting insult from injury: addressing cultural expectations in the disclosure of medical error J Med Ethics 31 2005 106 108
17. T.J. Krizek Surgical error: ethical issues of adverse events Arch Surg 135 2000 1359 1366
18. T.J. Krizek Surgical error: reflections on adverse events Bull Am Coll Surg 85 2000 18 22
19. F. Mohamad, S. Parent, and J. Pawelek Perioperative complications after surgical correction in neuromuscular scoliosis J Pediatr Orthop 27 2007 392 397
20. F.P. Cammisa Jr., F.P. Girardi, and P.K. Sangani Incidental durotomy in spine surgery Spine 25 2000 2663 2667
21. M. Ikenaga, J. Shikata, and M. Takemoto Clinical outcomes and complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis J Neurosurg Spine 6 2007 330 336
22. A.A. Jones, J.L. Stambough, and R.A. Balderston Long-term results of lumbar spine surgery complicated by unintended incidental durotomy Spine 14 1989 443 446
23. S.I. Tafazal, and P.J. Sell Incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery: incidence and management Eur Spine J 14 2005 287 290
24. F. Stromqvist, B. Jonsson, and B. Stromqvist Dural lesions in lumbar disc herniation surgery: incidence, risk factors, and outcome Eur Spine J 19 2010 439 442
25. F. Stromqvist, B. Jonsson, and B. Stromqvist Dural lesions in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcome Eur Spine J 21 2012 825 828
26. A. Desai, P.A. Ball, and K. Bekelis Outcomes after incidental durotomy during first-time lumbar discectomy J Neurosurg Spine 14 2011 647 653
27. A. Desai, P.A. Ball, and K. Bekelis SPORT: does incidental durotomy affect long-term outcomes in cases of spinal stenosis? Neurosurgery 69 2011 38 44 discussion
28. O. Niggemeyer, J.M. Strauss, and K.P. Schulitz Comparison of surgical procedures for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1975 to 1995 Eur Spine J 6 1997 423 429
29. F.B. Christensen Lumbar spinal fusion. Outcome in relation to surgical methods, choice of implant and postoperative rehabilitation Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 75 2004 2 43
30. F. Lattig, D. Grob, and F.S. Kleinstueck Ratings of global outcome at the first post-operative assessment after spinal surgery: how often do the surgeon and patient agree? Eur Spine J 18 2009 386 394
31. F. Porchet, F. Lattig, and D. Grob Comparison of patient and surgeon ratings of outcome 12 months after spine surgery: presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting J Neurosurg Spine 12 2010 447 455
32. U. Franneby, G. Sandblom, and O. Nyren Self-reported adverse events after groin hernia repair, a study based on a national register Value Health 11 2008 927 932
33. A.F. Mannion, A. Junge, and A. Elfering Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery? Spine 34 2009 1590 1599
34. J.L. Stambough Matching patient and physician expectations in spine surgery leads to improved outcomes Spine J 1 2001 234
35. D.L. Patrick, R.A. Deyo, and S.J. Atlas Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica Spine 20 1995 1899 1909
36. N. Steen, A. Hutchinson, and E. McColl Development of a symptom based outcome measure for asthma BMJ 309 1994 1065 1068
37. J.A. Cramer, S.D. Silberstein, and P. Winner Development and validation of the Headache Needs Assessment (HANA) survey Headache 41 2001 402 409