Comparison of patient and surgeon ratings of outcome 12 months after spine surgery

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 447-455

  Porchet, François ^a   Lattig, Friederike ^a   Grob, Dieter ^a   Kleinstueck, Frank S ^a   Jeszenszky, Dezsö ^a   Paus, Christophe ^a   O'Riordan, David ^b   Mannion, Anne F ^b  

^a Spine Center   (Switzerland)

^b SCHULTHESS CLINIC   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Core outcome measures index; Minimum clinically important difference; Outcome; Patient rating; Spine surgery; Surgeon rating

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; RATING SCALE; SELF CONCEPT; SPINE SURGERY; SURGEON;

FEMALE; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77951734313     PISSN: 15475654     EISSN: 15475646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2009.11.SPINE09526     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Beaton DE, Boers M, Wells GA: Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research. Curr Opin Rheumatol 14:109-114, 2002 (Pubitemid 34185291)
2. Brokelman RB, van Loon CJ, Rijnberg WJ: Patient versus surgeon satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:495-498, 2003 (Pubitemid 36621963)
3. Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, ed 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1988
4. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJHM, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, et al: Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 23:2003-2013, 1998
5. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL: Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 12.4 (Suppl):142S-158S, 1991
6. Deyo RA, Mirza SK: The case for restraint in spinal surgery: does quality management have a role to play? Eur Spine J (Suppl 3):331-337, 2009
7. Deyo RA, Mirza SK: Trends and variations in the use of spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:139-146, 2006
8. Ferrer M, Pellisé F, Escudero O, Alvarez L, Pont A, Alonso J, et al: Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain. Spine 31:1372-1380, 2006 (Pubitemid 43833085)
9. Hägg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group: The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:12-20, 2003
10. Lattig F, Grob D, Kleinstueck FS, Porchet F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, et al: Ratings of global outcome at the first postoperative assessment after spinal surgery: how often do the surgeon and patient agree? Eur Spine J 18 (3 Suppl 3):386-394, 2009
11. Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P, Schumacher L, Thomas BJ, Kilgus DJ, et al: Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:835-838, 1996 (Pubitemid 26241985)
12. Macnab I: Chapter 14. Pain and disability in degenerative disc disease. Clin Neurosurg 20:193-196, 1973
13. Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Dvorak J, et al: Predictors of multidimensional outcome after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 16:777-786, 2007 (Pubitemid 46944606)
14. Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, et al: Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14:1014-1026, 2005 (Pubitemid 41798055)
15. Mannion AF, Junge A, Elfering A, Dvorak J, Porchet F, Grob D: Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery? Spine 34:1590-1599, 2009
16. Mannion AF, Junge A, Grob D, Dvorak J, Fairbank JC: Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 2: sensitivity to change after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 15:66-73, 2006 (Pubitemid 43199174)
17. Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, et al: The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective. Part 1: The Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice. Eur Spine J (Suppl 3):367-373, 2009
18. Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, et al: The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J (Suppl 3):374-379, 2009
19. Marquié L, Raufaste E, Lauque D, Mariné C, Ecoiffier M, Sorum P: Pain rating by patients and physicians: evidence of systematic pain miscalibration. Pain 102:289-296, 2003 (Pubitemid 36369308)
20. McGee MA, Howie DW, Ryan P, Moss JR, Holubowycz OT: Comparison of patient and doctor responses to a total hip arthroplasty clinical evaluation questionnaire. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1745-1752, 2002 (Pubitemid 35176465)
21. McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Rand JA, Ilstrup DM: Correlation of patient questionnaire responses and physician history in grading clinical outcome following hip and knee arthroplasty. A prospective study of 201 joint arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 11:47-57, 1996
22. Ragab AA: Validity of self-assessment outcome questionnaires: patient-physician discrepancy in outcome interpretation. Biomed Sci Instrum 39:579-584, 2003
23. Rönnberg K, Lind B, Zoëga B, Halldin K, Gellerstedt M, Brisby H: Patients' satisfaction with provided care/information and expectations on clinical outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery. Spine 32:256-261, 2007 (Pubitemid 46105813)
24. Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W: Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain 8:283-291, 2004 (Pubitemid 38859657)
25. Smith AM, Barnes SA, Sperling JW, Farrell CM, Cummings JD, Cofield RH: Patient and physician-assessed shoulder function after arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:508-513, 2006
26. White P, Lewith G, Prescott P: The core outcomes for neck pain: validation of a new outcome measure. Spine 29:1923-1930, 2004