Patient-specific detection of perfusion abnormalities combining within-subject and between-subject variances in Arterial Spin Labeling

NeuroImage

Volumn 81, Issue , 2013, Pages 121-130

  Maumet, Camille ^a,b,c   Maurel, Pierre ^a,b,c   Ferré, Jean Christophe ^a,b,c,d   Carsin, Béatrice ^d   Barillot, Christian ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^b INRIA   (France)

^c CAMPUS DE BEAULIEU   (France)

^d RENNES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Arterial Spin Labeling; General Linear Model; Heteroscedasticity; Hyper perfusion; Hypo perfusion; Within subject variance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN PERFUSION; BRAIN PERFUSION DISORDER; BRAIN TUMOR; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; GLIOSARCOMA; HETEROSCEDASTIC MODEL; HOMOSCEDASTIC MODEL; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPIN LABELING; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL STUDY; BRAIN; BRAIN CIRCULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; VASCULARIZATION;

SPIN LABELING;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; SPIN LABELS;

EID: 84878741238     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.079     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aguirre G.K., Zarahn E., D'Esposito M. Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. II. Spatially smoothed data collected under null-hypothesis and experimental conditions. NeuroImage 1997, 5:199-212.
2. Aguirre G.K., Detre J.a, Zarahn E., Alsop D.C. Experimental design and the relative sensitivity of BOLD and perfusion fMRI. NeuroImage 2002, 15:488-500.
3. Ashburner J., Friston K.J. Unified segmentation. NeuroImage 2005, 26:839-851.
4. Aslan S., Lu H. On the sensitivity of ASL MRI in detecting regional differences in cerebral blood flow. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010, 28:928-935.
5. Beckmann C.F., Jenkinson M., Smith S.M. General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI. NeuroImage 2003, 20:1052-1063.
6. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 1995, 57:289-300.
7. Buxton R.B., Frank L.R., Wong E.C., Siewert B., Warach S., Edelman R.R. A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998, 40:383-396.
8. Chen G., Saad Z.S., Nath A.R., Beauchamp M.S., Cox R.W. FMRI group analysis combining effect estimates and their variances. NeuroImage 2012, 60:747-765.
9. Cox R.W. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1996, 29:162-173.
10. Ferré J.C., Petr J., Bannier E., Barillot C., Gauvrit J.Y. Improving quality of arterial spin labeling MR imaging at 3Tesla with a 32-channel coil and parallel imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012, 1239:1233-1239.
11. Friston K.J., Stephan K.E., Lund T.E., Morcom A., Kiebel S. Mixed-effects and fMRI studies. NeuroImage 2005, 24:244-252.
12. Holmes A., Friston K. Generalisability, random effects & population inference. NeuroImage 1998, 7:S754.
13. Lindquist M.a, Spicer J., Asllani I., Wager T.D. Estimating and testing variance components in a multi-level GLM. NeuroImage 2012, 59:490-501.
14. MacIntosh B.J., Filippini N., Chappell M.a, Woolrich M.W., Mackay C.E., Jezzard P. Assessment of arterial arrival times derived from multiple inversion time pulsed arterial spin labeling MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010, 63:641-647.
15. Mériaux S., Roche A., Dehaene-Lambertz G., Thirion B., Poline J.B. Combined permutation test and mixed-effect model for group average analysis in fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2006, 27:402-410.
16. Mumford J.A., Nichols T. Simple group fMRI modeling and inference. NeuroImage 2009, 47:1469-1475.
17. Mumford J.a, Hernandez-Garcia L., Lee G.R., Nichols T.E. Estimation efficiency and statistical power in arterial spin labeling fMRI. NeuroImage 2006, 33:103-114.
18. Noguchi T., Yoshiura T., Hiwatashi A., Togao O., Yamashita K., Nagao E., Shono T., Mizoguchi M., Nagata S., Sasaki T., Suzuki S.O., Iwaki T., Kobayashi K., Mihara F., Honda H. Perfusion imaging of brain tumors using arterial spin-labeling: correlation with histopathologic vascular density. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2008, 29:688-693.
19. Ostergaard L., Weisskoff R.M., Chesler D.A., Gyldensted C., Rosen B.R. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn. Reson. Med. 1996, 36:715-725.
20. Penny W.D., Holmes A.J. Random-effects analysis. Human Brain Function 2004, 843-850. (San Diego). Elsevier (Ed.).
21. Petr J., Ferré J.-C., Raoult H., Bannier E., Gauvrit J.-Y., Barillot C. Template-based approach for detecting motor task activation-related hyperperfusion in pulsed ASL data. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013, (in press). 10.1002/hbm.22243.
22. Poldrack R.A., Mumford J., Nichols T. Handbook of Functional MRI Data Analysis 2011, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Rosner B. Percentage points for a generalized ESD many-outlier procedure. Technometrics 1983, 25:165-172.
24. Skudlarski P., Constable R.T., Gore J.C. ROC analysis of statistical methods used in functional MRI: individual subjects. NeuroImage 1999, 9:311-329.
25. Thirion B., Pinel P., Mériaux S., Roche A., Dehaene S., Poline J.B. Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: statistical and methodological issues for group analyses. NeuroImage 2007, 35:105-120.
26. Viviani R., Sim E.J., Lo H., Richter S., Haffer S., Osterfeld N., Thöne J., Beschoner P. Components of variance in brain perfusion and the design of studies of individual differences: the baseline study. NeuroImage 2009, 46:12-22.
27. Wang Z. Improving cerebral blood flow quantification for arterial spin labeled perfusion MRI by removing residual motion artifacts and global signal fluctuations. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012, 30(10):1409-1415. 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.004.
28. Wang Y., Saykin A.J., Pfeuffer J., Lin C., Mosier K.M., Shen L., Kim S., Hutchins G.D. Regional reproducibility of pulsed arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging at 3T. NeuroImage 2011, 54:1188-1195.
29. Wintermark M., Sesay M., Barbier E., Borbély K., Dillon W.P., Eastwood J.D., Glenn T.C., Grandin C.B., Pedraza S., Soustiel J.F., Nariai T., Zaharchuk G., Caillé J.M., Dousset V., Yonas H. Comparative overview of brain perfusion imaging techniques. Stroke 2005, 36:e83-e99.
30. Wong E.C., Buxton R.B., Frank L.R. Quantitative imaging of perfusion using a single subtraction (QUIPSS and QUIPSS II). Magn. Reson. Med. 1998, 39:702-708.
31. Woolrich M.W., Behrens T.E.J., Beckmann C.F., Jenkinson M., Smith S.M. Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. NeuroImage 2004, 21:1732-1747.
32. Worsley K.J., Liao C.H., Aston J., Petre V., Duncan G.H., Morales F., Evans a.C. A general statistical analysis for fMRI data. NeuroImage 2002, 15:1-15.
33. Zaharchuk G., Bammer R., Straka M., Shankaranarayan A., Alsop D.C., Fischbein N.J., Atlas S.W., Moseley M.E. Arterial spin-label imaging in patients with normal bolus perfusion-weighted MR imaging findings: pilot identification of the borderzone sign. Radiology 2009, 252:797-807.