Correlation of contrast agent kinetics between iodinated contrast-enhanced spectral tomosynthesis and gadolinium-enhanced MRI of breast lesions

European Radiology

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1528-1536

  Froeling, Vera ^a   Diekmann, Felix ^a   Renz, Diane M ^a   Fallenberg, Eva M ^a   Steffen, Ingo G ^a   Diekmann, Susanne ^a   Lawaczeck, Rüdiger ^b   Schmitzberger, Florian F ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast; Contrast agents; Mammography; Pharmacokinetics; Tomography

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM; IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST ADENOCARCINOMA; BREAST LESION; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PILOT STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; HUMANS; KINETICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84878731415     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2742-5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. (2003) Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 138:168-175
2. Förnvik D, Zackrisson S, Ljungberg O, et al. (2010) Breast tomosynthesis: accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography. Acta Radiol 51:240-247
3. Andersson I, Ikeda DM, Zackrisson S, et al. (2008) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol 18:2817-2825
4. Hellerhoff K (2010) Digital breast tomosynthesis: technical principles, current clinical relevance and future perspectives. Radiologe 50:991-998
5. Tingberg A (2010) X-ray tomosynthesis: a review of its use for breast and chest imaging. Radiat Prot Dosim 139:100-107
6. Lewin JM, Niklason L (2007) Advanced applications of digital mammography: tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Semin Roentgenol 42:243-252
7. Lee SH, Kim JH, Cho N, et al. (2010) Multilevel analysis of spatiotemporal association features for differentiation of tumor enhancement patterns in breast DCE-MRI. Med Phys 37:3940-3956
8. Yamamoto A, Fukushima H, Okamura R, et al. (2006) Dynamic helical CT mammography of breast cancer. Radiat Med 24:35-40
9. Prionas ND, Lindfors KK, Ray S, et al. (2010) Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. Radiology 256:714-723
10. Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Jeunehomme F, Muller S, Hamm B, Bick U (2005) Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement. Investig Radiol 40:397-404
11. Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Adler G, Garbay JR, Delaloge S (2009) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 69:34-42
12. Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Muller S, et al. (2006) Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Am J Roentgenol 187:528-537
13. Jong RA, Yaffe MJ, Skarpathiotakis M, et al. (2003) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. Radiology 228:842-850
14. Schmitzberger FF, Fallenberg EM, Lawaczeck R, et al. (2011) Development of low-dose photon-counting contrast-enhanced tomosynthesis with spectral imaging. Radiology 259:558-564
15. Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Gajda M, Kaiser WA (2010) An exception to tumour neoangiogenesis in a malignant breast-lesion. Breast J 16:197-198
16. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. (1999) Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211:101-110
17. Kuhl CK, Jost P, Morakkabati N, Zivanovic O, Schild HH, Gieseke J (2006) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience. Radiology 239:666-676
18. Nunes LW, Englander SA, Charafeddine R, Schnall MD (2002) Optimal post-contrast timing of breast MR image acquisition for architectural feature analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:42-50
19. Hylton NM (2001) Vascularity assessment of breast lesions with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 9:321-332
20. Carton AK, Gavenonis SC, Currivan JA, Conant EF, Schnall MD, Maidment AD (2010) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis-a feasibility study. Br J Radiol 83:344-350
21. Fredenberg E, et al. (2010) Energy resolution of a photon- counting silicon strip detector. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 613:156-162
22. Lawaczeck R, Jost G, Pietsch H (2011) Pharmacokinetics of contrast media in humans: model with circulation, distribution, and renal excretion. Investig Radiol 46:576-585
23. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1:159-174
24. Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM, et al. (2009) Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:586-591