Pharmacokinetics of contrast media in humans: Model with circulation, distribution, and renal excretion

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 46, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 576-585

  Lawaczeck, Rüdiger ^a   Jost, Gregor ^b   Pietsch, Hubertus ^b  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b BAYER PHARMA AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

contrast media; humans; pharmacokinetics

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ARTICLE; BLOOD VOLUME; DRUG BLOOD LEVEL; DRUG DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KIDNEY INTERSTITIUM; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URINARY EXCRETION;

EID: 80051784239     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31821c1140     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Schoellnast H, Tillich M, Deutschmann HA, et al. Abdominal multidetector row computed tomography: reduction of cost and contrast material dose using saline flush. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003;27:847-853. (Pubitemid 37420777)
2. Schoellnast H, Tillich M, Deutschmann MJ, et al. Aortoiliac enhancement during computed tomography angiography with reduced contrast material dose and saline solution flush: influence on magnitude and uniformity of the contrast column. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:20-26. (Pubitemid 38030173)
3. de Monyé C, Cademartiri F, de Weert TT, et al. Sixteen-detector row CT angiography of carotid arteries: comparison of different volumes of contrast material with and without a bolus chaser. Radiology. 2005;237:555-562. (Pubitemid 41507894)
4. Lee CH, Goo JM, Bae KT, et al. CTA contrast enhancement of the aorta and pulmonary artery: the effect of saline chase injected at two different rates in a canine experimental model. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:486-490. (Pubitemid 46955242)
5. Kim DJ, Kim TH, Kim SJ, et al. Saline flush effect for enhancement of aorta and coronary arteries at multidetector CT coronary angiography. Radiology. 2008;246:110-115.
6. Krause W. Application of pharmacokinetics to computed tomography: injection rates and schemes: mono-, bi-, or multipasic? Invest Radiol. 1996;31:91-100. (Pubitemid 26053994)
7. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part I: prediction with a computer model. Radiology. 1998;207:647-655.
8. Bae KT, Tran HQ, Heiken JP. Multiphasic injection method for uniform prolonged vascular enhancement at CT angiography: pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. Radiology. 2000;216:872-880. (Pubitemid 30660868)
9. Bae KT. Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Radiology. 2003;227:809-816. (Pubitemid 36583041)
10. Bae KT. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology. 2010;256:32-61.
11. Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1: fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med. 1991;17:357-367.
12. Tofts PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:91-101. (Pubitemid 28365643)
13. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T (1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:223-232. (Pubitemid 29463104)
14. Parker GJ, Roberts C, Macdonald A, et al. Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2006;56:993-1000. (Pubitemid 44691341)
15. Orton MR, d'Arcy JA, Walker-Samuel S, et al. Computationally efficient vascular input function models for quantitative kinetic modelling using DCE-MRI. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53:1225-1239. (Pubitemid 351594423)
16. Kim SM, Haider MA, Milosevic M, et al. Interindividual variability of arterial impulse response to intravenous injection of nonionic contrast agent (Iohexol) in DCE-CT study. Med Phys. 2009;36:4791-4802.
17. Patlak CS, Goldstein DA, Hoffman JF. The flow of solute and solvent across a two-membrane system. J Theor Biol. 1963;5:426-442.
18. Renkin EM. Some consequences of capillary permeability to macromolecules: Starling's hypothesis reconsidered. Am J Physiol. 1986;250(5 Pt 2):H706-H710.
19. Brix G, Semmler W, Port R, et al. Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1991;15:621-628.
20. Zwick S, Brix G, Tofts PS, et al. Simulation-based comparison of two approaches frequently used for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:432-442.
21. Weinmann HJ, Laniado M, Mützel W. Pharmacokinetics of GdDTPA/dimeglumine after intravenous injection into healthy volunteers. Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR. 1984;16:167-172.
22. Zelman A. Membrane permeability. Generalization of the reflection coefficient method of describing volume and solute flows. Biophys J. 1972;12:414-419.
23. Rowland M, Tozer TN. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, London: Lea & Febiger; 1989.
24. Silbernagl S, Despopoulos A. Taschenatlas der Physiologie. 4 Auflage. Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1991.
25. Thews G, Mutschler E, Vaupel P. Anatomie, Physiologie, Pathophysiologie des Menschen. 3. Auflage. Stuttgart, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; 1989.
26. Derendorf H, Garrett ER. Pharmakokinetik. Stuttgart, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; 1987.
27. Truniger B, Richards P. Wasser-und Elektrolythaushalt. 5 Auflage. Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1985.
28. Gado MH, Phelps ME, Coleman RE. An extravascular compartment of contrast enhancement in cranial computed tomography. Part 1. Radiology. 1975;117:589-593.
29. Riding M, Bergstrom M, Bergvall V, et al. Computer intravenous angiography. Acta Radiol. 1975;346(suppl):82-90. (Pubitemid 8079525)
30. Horsfield MA, Thornton JS, Gill A, et al. A functional form for injected MRI Gd-chelate contrast agent concentration incorporating recirculation, extravasation and excretion. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:2933-2949.
31. Hoffmann U, Brix G, Knopp MV, et al. Pharmacokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR mammogaphy. Magn Reson Med. 1995;33:506-514.
32. Puskas Z, Schuierer G. Kreislaufzeitbestimmung zur Optimierung der Kontrastmittelapplikation bei der CT-Angiographie [Determination of blood circulation time for optimizing contrast medium administration in CT angiography]. Radiologe. 1996;36:750-757. (Pubitemid 26330114)
33. Heiland S, Erb G, Ziegler S, et al. Where contrast agent really matters: A comparison of CT and MRI. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:529-537.
34. Knollmann F, Schimpf K, Felix R Iodine delivery of different concentrations of iodine-containing contrast agents with rapid injection. Fortschr Rontgenstr. 2004;176:880-884. (Pubitemid 38833021)
35. Liang J, Sammet S, Yang X, et al. Intraindividual in vivo comparison of gadolinium contrast agents for pharmacokinetic analysis using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:233-244.