Development of data models for nursing assessment of cancer survivors using concept analysis

Healthcare Informatics Research

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 38-50

  Kyung Lee, Myung ^a   Park, Hyeoun Ae ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Electronic health record; Nursing assessment; Quality of healthcare; Standards of care

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878723549     PISSN: 20933681     EISSN: 2093369X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4258/hir.2011.17.1.38     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2008. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2008. p57.
2. Twombly R. What's in a name: who is a cancer survivor? J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96: 1414-1415.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Cancer survivorship: United States, 1971-2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004; 53: 526-529.
4. Feuerstein, M, Findley P. The cancer survivor's guide: the essential handbook to life after cancer. New York: Marlowe & Co; 2006. p1.
5. Whippen D, Deering MJ, Ambinder EP. Advancing high-quality cancer care: cancer biomedical informatics grid supports personalized medicine and the electronic health record. J Oncol Pract 2007; 3: 208-211.
6. Graybeal, J. Achieving semantic interoperability. The MMI guides- navigating the world of marine metadata. Marine Metadata Initiative; 2009 [cited at 2011 Mar 15]. Available from: http://marinemetadata.org/guides/vocabs/cvchooseimplement/cvsemint.
7. Hovenga E, Garde S, Heard S. Nursing constraint models for electronic health records: a vision for domain knowledge governance. Int J Med Inform 2005; 74: 886-898.
8. Beale T. Archetypes: constraint-based domain models for future-proof information systems. In: Baclawsk, K. Kilov H, eds. Eleventh OOPSLA workshop on behavioral semantics: serving the customer. Boston: Northeastern University; 2002: p16-32.
9. Goossen WT. Using detailed clinical models to bridge the gap between clinicians and HIT. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 141: 3-10.
10. Huff SM. The GE-intermountain healthcare alliance: a new paradigm for EHR dev elopment. In: Proceeding of the 4th EHR Symposium; 2009; Seoul, KR. p14-28.
11. Kim Y, Huff SM, Ahn SJ, Cho KH, Koh YT. Clinical contents medol: definition, methods, and practical use. In: Proceedings of the 6th Asia Pacific Association for Medical Informatics (APAMI); 2009 Nov 22-24; Hiroshima, JP. pW-03.
12. Johnson SB. Generic data modeling for clinical repositories. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996; 3: 328-339.
13. Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for theory construction in nursing. Norwlk, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1988.
14. Matteson P, Hawkins JW. Concept analysis of decision making. Nurs Forum 1990; 25: 4-10.
15. Hawks JH. Power: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 1991; 16: 754-762.
16. Henneman EA, Lee JL, Cohen JI. Collaboration: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 1995; 21: 103-109.
17. Schadow G, Brion P, McKenzie L, Grieve G, Pratt D. HL7 version 3 standard. Data types - abstract specification, release 1. Health Level SevenTM Inc.; 2004 [cited at 2010 Mar 15]. Available from: http://www.hl7.org/v3ballot/html/infrastructure/datatypes/datatypes.html.
18. Dolin RH, Alschuler L, Boyer S, Beebe C, Behlen FM, Biron PV, Shabo Shvo A. HL7 clinical document architecture: Release 2. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13: 30-39.
19. Chute CG, Cohn SP, Campbell JR. A framework for comprehensive health terminology systems in the United States: development guidelines, criteria for selection, and public policy implications. ANSI healthcare informatics standards board vocabulary working group and the computer-based patient records institute working group on codes and structures. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5: 503-510.
20. Bakhshi-Raiez F, Cornet R, de Keizer NF. Development and application of a framework for maintenance of medical terminological systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15: 687-700.
21. Kim TY, Coenen A, Hardiker N. A quality improvement model for healthcare terminologies. J Biomed Inform 2010; 43: 1036-1043.
22. Cimino JJ, Clayton PD, Hripcsak G, Johnson SB. Knowledge-based approaches to the maintenance of a large controlled medical terminology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 35-50.
23. Campbell JR, Carpenter P, Sneiderman C, Cohn S, Chute CG, Warren J. Phase II evaluation of clinical coding schemes: completeness, taxonomy, mapping, definitions, and clarity: CPRI work group on codes and structures. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; 4: 238-251.
24. Kim HJ, McGuire DB, Tulman L, Barsevick AM. Symptom clusters: concept analysis and clinical implications for cancer nursing. Cancer Nurs 2005; 28: 270-282.
25. Armstrong TS. Symptoms experience: a concept analysis. Oncol Nurs Forum 2003; 30: 601-606.
26. Doyle N. Cancer survivorship: evolutionary concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2008; 62: 499-509.
27. Ridner SH. Psychological distress: concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2004; 45: 536-545.
28. Fochtman D. The concept of suffering in children and adolescents with cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 2006; 23: 92-102.
29. Sun Y, Knobf MT. Concept analysis of symptom disclosure in the context of cancer. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 2008; 31: 332-341.
30. Wen KY, Gustafson DH. Needs assessment for cancer patients and their families. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 11.