Phase II Evaluation of Clinical Coding Schemes: Completeness, Taxonomy, Mapping, Definitions, and Clarity

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 238-251

  Campbell, James R ^a   Carpenter, Paul ^c   Sneiderman, Charles ^e   Cohn, Simon ^d   Chute, Christopher G ^c   Warren, Judith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b University of Nebraska Hospital   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^e KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOCUMENTATION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RECORD; NOMENCLATURE; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TERMINOLOGY; UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEM; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 0031136437     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040238     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Dick RS, Steen EB. The computer-based patient record: An essential technology for health care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991.
2. Cimino JJ, Clayton PD, Hripcsak G, Johnson S. Knowledge-based approaches to the maintenance of a large controlled medical terminology. JAMIA. 1994;1:35-50.
3. International Standards Organization. International Standard ISO 1087: Terminology - Vocabulary. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organization, 1990.
4. Read JD, Sanderson HF, Drennan YM. Terming, encoding and grouping. MEDINFO 1995: Proceedings of the Eighth World Congress on Medical Informatics. Greenes RA (ed). 1995; North Holland Publishing, pp. 56-59.
5. Chute C, Cohn S, Campbell K, Oliver D, Campbell JR. The content coverage of clinical classifications. JAMIA. 1996;3: 224-33.
6. Campbell JR, Payne TH. A comparison of four schemes for codification of problem lists. Proc Ann Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994;201-5.
7. Rosenberg KM, Coultas DB. Acceptability of Unified Medical Language System terms as substitute for natural language general medicine clinic diagnoses. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994;193-7.
8. Henry SB, Campbell KE, Holzemer WL. Representation of nursing terms for the description of patient problems using SNOMED III. Proc Ann Symp Comp Appl Med Care. 1993; 700-4.
9. Campbell JR, Kallenberg GA, Sherrick RC. The Clinical Utility of META: an analysis for hypertension. Proc Ann Symp Comput App Med Care. 1992;397-401.
10. Payne TH, Martin DR. How useful is the UMLS metathesaurus in developing a controlled vocabulary for an automated problem list? Proc Ann Symp Comput App Med Care. 1993;705-9.
11. Payne TH, Murphy GR, Salazar AA. How well does ICD9 represent phrases used in the medical record problem list? Proc Ann Symp Comput App Med Care. 1992;205-9.
12. Friedman C. The UMLS coverage of clinical radiology. Proc Ann Symp Comput App Med Care. 1992;309-13.
13. Henry SB, Holzemer WL, Reilly CA, Campbell KE. Terms used by nurses to describe patient problems. JAMIA. 1994; 1:61-74.
14. Zielstorf RD, Cimino C, Barnett GO, Hassan L, Blewett DR. Representation of nursing terminology in the UMLS metathesaurus; a pilot study. Proc Ann Symp Comp App Med Care. 1992;392-6.
15. Chisolm J. The Read Classification. BMJ. 1990;300:1092.
16. Read Codes File Structure Version 3: Overview and Technical description. Woodgate, Leicestershire, UK: NHS Centre for Coding and Classification, 1994.
17. Cote RA, Rothwell DJ, Palotay JL, Beckett RS, Brochu L, eds. The Systematized Nomenclature of Human and Veterinary Medicine: SNOMED International. College of American Pathologists, 1993.
18. Cad RA, Robboy S. Progress in medical information management. Systematized nomenclature of medicine (SNO-MED). JAMA. 1980;243:756-62.
19. Evans DA, Rothwell DJ, Monarch IA, et al. Toward representations for medical concepts. Med Decision Making. 1991;11(4 Suppl):S102-8.
20. Lindberg DA, Humphreys BL, McCray AT. The Unified Medical Language System. Meth Inf Med. 1993;32:281-91.
21. Lindberg DAB, Humphreys BL, McCray AT. Yearbook of Medical Informatics. "The Unified Medical Language System." 1993;41-51.
22. Humphreys BL, Lindberg DA. The UMLS project: making the conceptual connection between users and the information they need. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993;81:170-7.
23. McCray AT, Razi A. The UMLS knowledge source server. MEDINFO. 1995;144-7.
24. McCray AT, Divita G. ASN.1 Defining a Grammar for the UMLS Knowledge Sources. Proc Ann Symp Comp App Med Care. 1995;868-72.
25. Overview of the SAS System. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina. 1990.
26. Campbell KE, Das AK, Musen MA. A logical foundation for the representation of clinical data. JAMIA. 1994;218-32.
27. Stitt FW. A standards-based clinical information system for HIV/AIDS. Med Info. 1995;8 Pt 1:402.
28. Cimino JJ. From ICD-9-CM to MESH using the UMLS: a how-to-guide. Proc Ann Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993:730-4.
29. Cimino JJ. Representation of clinical laboratory terminology in the Unified Medical Language System. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991;199-203.
30. Board of Directors of the American Medical Informatics Association. Standards for Medical Identifiers, Codes and Messages Needed to Create an Efficient Computer-stored Medical Record. JAMIA. 1994;1:1-7.