Evaluation of a role functioning computer adaptive test (RF-CAT)

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1085-1092

  Anatchkova, M ^a   Rose, M ^a,b   Ware, J ^a,e   Bjorner, J B ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^c NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR THE WORKING ENVIRONMENT   (Denmark)

^d QualityMetric Incorporated   (United States)

^e John Ware Research Group Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer adaptive test; Health related quality of life; Patient reported outcome; Role function

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPUTER; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF REPORT; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT; ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPUTERS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF REPORT; SICK ROLE; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84878707927     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0215-6     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Cella, D.; Riley, W.; Stone, A.; et al. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179-1194.
2. Gandek, B.; Sinclair, S. J.; Jette, A. M.; Ware Jr.; J. E. (2007). Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for post-acute care (PM-PAC). American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 86(0894-9115; 1), 57-71.
3. Haley, S. M.; Gandek, B.; Siebens, H.; et al. (2008). Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(2), 275-283.
4. Mulcahey, M. J.; Haley, S. M.; Duffy, T.; Pengsheng, N.; Betz, R. R. (2008). Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 28(0271-6798; 3), 330-335.
5. Wilkie, D. J.; Judge, M. K.; Berry, D. L.; Dell, J.; Zong, S.; Gilespie, R. (2003). Usability of a computerized PAINReportIt in the general public with pain and people with cancer pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 25(0885-3924; 3), 213-224.
6. Bjorner, J. B.; Kosinski, M.; Ware, J. E.; Jr. (2003). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: An application of item response theory to the headache impact test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12(8), 913-933.
7. Bayliss, M. S.; Dewey, J. E.; Dunlap, I.; et al. (2003). A study of the feasibility of internet administration of a computerized health survey: The headache impact test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12(8), 953-961.
8. Cella, D.; Yount, S.; Rothrock, N.; et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3-S11.
9. Haley, S. M.; Fragala-Pinkham, M.; Ni, P. (2006). Sensitivity of a computer adaptive assessment for measuring functional mobility changes in children enrolled in a community fitness programme. Clinical Rehabilitation, 20(7), 616-622.
10. Hart, D. L.; Deutscher, D.; Werneke, M. W.; Holder, J.; Wang, Y. C. (2010). Implementing computerized adaptive tests in routine clinical practice: Experience implementing CATs. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11(3), 288-303.
11. Hart, D. L.; Wang, Y. C.; Cook, K. F.; Mioduski, J. E. (2010). A computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments produced responsive measures of function. Physical Therapy, 90(6), 928-938.
12. Hart, D. L.; Werneke, M. W.; Wang, Y. C.; Stratford, P. W.; Mioduski, J. E. (2010). Computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 35(24), 2157-2164.
13. Turner-Bowker, D. M.; Saris-Baglama, R. N.; Anatchkova, M.; Mosen, D. M. (2010). A computerized asthma outcomes measure is feasible for disease management. The American Journal of Pharmacy Benefits, 2(2), 119-124.
14. Anatchkova, M. D.; Saris-Baglama, R. N.; Kosinski, M.; Bjorner, J. B. (2009). Development and preliminary testing of a computerized adaptive assessment of chronic pain. The Journal of Pain, 10(9), 932-943.
15. Becker, J.; Fliege, H.; Kocalevent, R. D.; et al. (2008). Functioning and validity of a computerized adaptive test to measure anxiety (A-CAT). Depress Anxiety, 25(12), E182-E194.
16. Kopec, J. A.; Badii, M.; McKenna, M.; Lima, V. D.; Sayre, E. C.; Dvorak, M. (2008). Computerized adaptive testing in back pain: Validation of the CAT-5D-QOL. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 33(12), 1384-1390.
17. Kosinski, M.; Bjorner, J. B.; Ware, J. E.; Jr.; Sullivan, E.; Straus, W. L. (2006). An evaluation of a patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing osteoarthritis impact. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(7), 715-723.
18. World Health Organization. (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF: The international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO).
19. Anatchkova, M. D.; Bjorner, J. B. (2010). Health and role functioning: The use of focus groups in the development of an item bank. Quality of Life Research, 19(1), 111-123.
20. Anatchkova, M. D.; Ware, J. E.; Bjorner, J. B. (2011). Assessing the factor structure of a role functioning item bank. Quality of Life Research, 20, 745-758.
21. Muraki, E. (1997). Generalized partial credit model. In V. D. Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of item response theory (pp. 153-164). New York, NY: Springer.
22. Bjorner, J. B.; Chang, C. H.; Thissen, D.; Reeve, B. B. (2007). Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 95-108.
23. Anatchkova, M. D.; Bjorner, J. B. Item calibration of a generic role functioning item bank. ISPOR 13th Annual European Congress, Prague. http://www.ispor.org/research-study-digest/details.asp.
24. Ware, J. E.; Jr.; Dewey, J. (2000). How to score version two of the SF-36 health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.
25. Kessler, R. C.; Barber, C.; Beck, A.; et al. (2003). The world health organization health and work performance questionnaire (HPQ). Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45(2), 156-174.
26. Lerner, D.; Amick III, B. C.; Rogers, W. H.; Malspeis, S.; Bungay, K.; Cynn, D. (2001). The work limitations questionnaire. Medical Care, 39(0025-7079; 1), 72-85.
27. Ware, J. E.; Jr.; Kosinski, M.; Turner-Bowker, D. M.; Gandek, B. (2002). How to score version two of the SF-12 health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.
28. Moriarty, D. G.; Zack, M. M.; Kobau, R. (2003). The centers for disease control and prevention's healthy days measures: Population tracking of perceived physical and mental health over time. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1(1), 37.
29. McHorney, C. A.; Ware, J. E.; Jr.; Raczek, A. E. (1993). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31, 247-263.