Assessing the factor structure of a role functioning item bank

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 745-758

  Anatchkova, Milena D ^a   Ware Jr , John E ^a   Bjorner, Jakob B ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR THE WORKING ENVIRONMENT   (Denmark)

^c QualityMetric   (United States)

Author keywords

Bi factor model; Dimensionality; Role functioning

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; ROLE PLAYING; SELF CONCEPT; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TEACHING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; ROLE PLAYING; SELF CONCEPT; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960212833     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9807-1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. World Health Organization. (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF-the international classification of functioning, disability and health.
2. EM Badley 2008 Enhancing the conceptual clarity of the activity and participation components of the international classification of functioning, disability, and health Social Science and Medicine 66 2335 2345 18314239 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.026 (Pubitemid 351608736)
3. KR Merikangas M Ames L Cui PE Stang TB Ustun M Von Korff RC Kessler 2007 The impact of comorbidity of mental and physical conditions on role disability in the US adult household population Archives of General Psychiatry 64 1180 1188 17909130 10.1001/archpsyc.64.10.1180 (Pubitemid 47529342)
4. BG Druss I Hwang M Petukhova NA Sampson PS Wang RC Kessler 2009 Impairment in role functioning in mental and chronic medical disorders in the united states: Results from the national comorbidity survey replication Molecular Psychiatry 14 728 737 18283278 10.1038/mp.2008.13 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1MvjsVeitA%3D%3D
5. MD Anatchkova JB Bjorner 2010 Health and role functioning: The use of focus groups in the development of an item bank Quality of Life Research 19 111 123 20047086 10.1007/s11136-009-9570-3
6. B Gandek SJ Sinclair AM Jette JE Ware Jr. 2007 Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for post-acute care (PM-PAC) American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 86 57 71 17033591 10.1097/01.phm.0000233200.43822.21 (Pubitemid 46360565)
7. SM Haley B Gandek H Siebens RM Black-Schaffer SJ Sinclair W Tao WJ Coster P Ni AM Jette 2008 Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 89 275 283 18226651 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.150
8. MJ Mulcahey SM Haley T Duffy N Pengsheng RR Betz 2008 Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 28 330 335 18362799 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318168c792 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1czjtlWgsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 351440842)
9. DJ Wilkie MK Judge DL Berry J Dell S Zong R Gilespie 2003 Usability of a computerized PAINReportIt in the general public with pain and people with cancer pain Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 25 213 224 12614956 10.1016/S0885-3924(02)00638-3 (Pubitemid 36287080)
10. JB Bjorner M Kosinski JE Ware Jr. 2003 Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: An application of item response theory to the headache impact test (HIT) Quality of Life Research 12 913 933 14651412 10.1023/A:1026163113446 (Pubitemid 37386622)
11. MS Bayliss JE Dewey I Dunlap AS Batenhorst R Cady ML Diamond F Sheftell 2003 A study of the feasibility of internet administration of a computerized health survey: The headache impact test (HIT) Quality of Life Research 12 953 961 14651414 10.1023/A:1026167214355 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3srmtlOguw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 37386624)
12. JS Lai PK Crane D Cella 2006 Factor analysis techniques for assessing sufficient unidimensionality of cancer related fatigue Quality of Life Research 15 1179 1190 17001438 10.1007/s11136-006-0060-6
13. KF Cook MA Kallen D Amtmann 2009 Having a fit: Impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT's unidimensionality assumption Quality of Life Research 18 447 460 19294529 10.1007/s11136-009-9464-4
14. SP Reise J Morizot RD Hays 2007 The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures Quality of Life Research 16 Suppl 1 19 31 17479357 10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7 (Pubitemid 47036916)
15. BP O'Connor 2000 SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and velicer's MAP test Behavior Research Methods Instruments Computers 32 396 402 10.3758/BF03200807
16. BB Reeve RD Hays JB Bjorner KF Cook PK Crane JA Teresi D Thissen DA Revicki DJ Weiss RK Hambleton H Liu R Gershon SP Reise JS Lai D Cella 2007 Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) Medical Care 45 S22 S31 17443115 10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04
17. PM Podsakoff SB MacKenzie JY Lee NP Podsakoff 2003 Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies Journal of Applied Psychology 88 879 903 14516251 10.1037/0021-9010.88. 5.879 (Pubitemid 37239703)
18. M Hankins 2008 The factor structure of the twelve item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12): The result of negative phrasing? Clinical Practice of Epidemiology in Mental Health 4 10 10.1186/1745-0179-4-10 (Pubitemid 351639513)
19. PM Horan C DiStefano RW Motl 2003 Wording effects in self-esteem scales: Methodological artifact or response style? Structural Equation Modeling 10 435 455 10.1207/S15328007SEM1003-6
20. Ware, J. E.; Jr.; & Dewey, J. (2000). How to score version two of the SF-36 health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.
21. JB Bjorner CH Chang D Thissen BB Reeve 2007 Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment Quality of Life Research 16 95 108 17530450 10.1007/s11136-007-9168-6 (Pubitemid 47036912)
22. Turner-Bowker, D. M.; Anatchkova, M. D.; Bjorner, J. B.; Saris-Baglama, R. N.; Chan, K. S.; Huang, I.; Wu, A. (2009). Preliminary development of a computerized adaptive test for health-related quality of life outcomes in HIV. The Quality of Life Research Journal.
23. Marsh, H. W.; & Grayson, D. (1995). Latent variable models of multitrait-multimethod data. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Muthen, B.; & Muthen, L. (1998). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
25. L Hu PM Bentler 1999 Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives Structural equation modeling 6 1 55 10.1080/10705519909540118
26. TR Brown 2003 Confirmatory factor analysis of the penn state worry questionnaire: Multiple factors or method effects? Behaviour Research and Therapy 41 1411 1426 14583411 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00059-7 (Pubitemid 37315919)
27. RC MacCallum MW Browne HM Sugawara 1996 Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling Psychological Methods 1 130 149 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 (Pubitemid 126672841)
28. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
29. FF Chen SG West KH Sousa 2006 A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life Multivariate Behavioral Research 41 189 225 10.1207/s15327906mbr4102-5 (Pubitemid 44231227)
30. WH Chen DA Revicki JS Lai KF Cook D Amtmann 2009 Linking pain items from two studies onto a common scale using item response theory Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 38 615 628 19577422 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.11.016
31. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent child. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. JG Bachman PM O'Malley 1986 Self-concepts, self-esteem, and educational experiences: The frog pond revisited (again) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 35 46 10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.35
33. Carmines, E. G.; & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34. HW Marsh 1996 Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 810 819 8636900 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.810 1:STN:280: DyaK283gt1Wluw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 126420712)
35. JM Tomas A Oliver 1999 Rosenberg's self-esteem scale: Two factors or method effects Structural Equation Modeling 6 84 98 10.1080/10705519909540120
36. J Wang HA Siegal RS Falck RG Carlson 2001 Factorial structure of Rosenberg's self-esteem scale among crack-cocaine drug users Structural Equation Modeling 8 275 286 10.1207/S15328007SEM0802-6
37. RW Motl DE Conroy 2000 Validity and factorial invariance of the social physique anxiety scale Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 32 1007 1017 10795794 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3lsVyisw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30230685)
38. Chen, Y.; Rendina-Gobioff, G.; Dedrick, R. F. (2007). Detecting effects of positively and negatively worded items on a self-concept scale for third and sixth grade elementary students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Florida Educational Research Association (52nd, Tampa, FL, Nov 14-16, 2007).