A study of the feasibility of Internet administration of a computerized health survey: The headache impact test (HIT™)

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 953-961

  Bayliss, M S ^a   Dewey, J E ^a   Dunlap, I ^b   Batenhorst, A S ^b   Cady, R ^c   Diamond, M L ^d   Sheftell, F ^e  

^a QualityMetric Incorporated   (United States)

^b GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United States)

^c HEADACHE CARE CENTER   (United States)

^d DIAMOND HEADACHE CLINIC   (United States)

^e NEW ENGLAND CENTER FOR HEADACHE   (United States)

Author keywords

Depression; Headache impact; Headache impact test (HIT); Health behavior; Health related quality of life; HIT; Internet; Migraine

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DEPRESSION; DISABILITY; DYNAMIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HEADACHE IMPACT TEST; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; MIGRAINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 8 HEALTH SURVEY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE;

EID: 0242574563     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1026167214355     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bjorner JB, Kosinski M, Ware JE. Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: An application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT™) Quality Life Res 2003; 12: 913-933.
2. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, et al. Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact. Quality Life Res 2003; 12: 935-952.
3. Ware JE Jr, Bjorner JB, Kosinski M. Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: A brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. Med Care 2000; 38(Suppl 9): II73-II82.
4. Wainer H, Dorans NJ, Flaugher R, et al. Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.
5. Lipton RB, Hamelsky SW, Kolodner KB, et al. Migraine, quality of life, and depression: A population-based case-control study. Neurology 2000; 55(5): 610-611.
6. Silberstein S, Lipton R, Breslau N. Migraine: Association with personality characteristics and psychopathology. Cephalalgia 1995; 15: 358-369.
7. Merikangas K, Angst J, Isler H. Migraine and psychopathology: Results of the Zurich cohort study of young adults. Arch Gen Psychiat 1990; 47: 849-853.
8. Breslau N, Davis F. Migraine, major depression and panic disorder: A prospective epidemiologic study of young adults. Cephalalgia 1992; 12: 85-90.
9. Breslau N, Davis G, Schultz L, Peterson F. Joint 1994 Wolff Award Presentation. Migraine and major depression: A longitudinal study. Headache 1994; 34: 387-393.
10. Breslau N, Schultz L, Stewart W, et al. Headache and major depression: Is the association specific to migraine? Neurology 2000; 54: 308-313.
11. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE, Gandek B. How to Score and Interpret Single-Item Health Status Measures: A Manual for Users of the SF-8™ Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated, 2001.
12. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey J. How to Score Version 2 of SF-36® Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated, 2000.
13. Ware JE, Kosinski M. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A Manual for Users of Version. 2nd ed. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated, 2001.
14. Kosinski M, Cady R, Sheftell F, et al. Use of the Headache Impact Test (HIT™) with other Health Status Assessments to Identify Patients with Comorbid Depression. Presented at the 10th Congress of the International Headache Society, New York, 29 June-2 July, 2001.
15. International Headache Society. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 1988; 8(Suppl 7): 1-96.
16. Berwick DM, Murphy JM, Goldman PA, et al. Performance of a five-item mental health screening test. Med Care 1991; 29(2): 169-176.
17. Weinstein MC, Berwick DM, Goldman PA, et al. A comparison of three psychiatric screening tests using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Med Care 1989; 27(6): 593-607.
18. Sheehan K. E-mail survey response rates: A review. J Comput Mediated Commun 2001; 6(2) [online].