The evaluation of prospective teachers in teacher education

International Encyclopedia of Education

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 511-517

  Tigelaar, D E H ^a   Van Tartwijk, J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Learning oriented assessment; Peer assessment; Portfolio assessment; Reliability; Self assessment; Simulations; Standards based assessment; Teacher assessment; Teacher education; Teacher learning; Teacher professional development; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878621526     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00647-3     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Airasian P., Gullickson A., Hahn L., Farland D. Teacher Self-Evaluation: The Literature in Perspective 1995, Center for Research of Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation, Kalamazoo, MI.
2. Andrews T.E., Barnes S. Assessment of teaching. Handbook of Research on Teacher Education 1990, 569-598. Macmillan, New York. W.R. Houston (Ed.).
3. Boud D., Cohen R., Sampson J. Peer learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 1999, 24(4):413-426.
4. Carless D. Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual basis and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 2007, 44(1):57-66.
5. Darling-Hammond L., Snyder J. Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education 2000, 16:523-545.
6. Delandshere G., Petrosky A.R. Capturing teachers' knowledge: Performance assessment and post-structuralism. Educational Researcher 1994, 23(5):11-18.
7. Dierick S., Dochy F. New lines in edumetrics: New forms of assessment lead to new assessment criteria. Studies in Educational Evaluation 2001, 27:307-329.
8. Feiman-Nemser S., Remillard J. Perspectives on learning to teach. The Teacher Educator's Handbook: Building a Knowledge Base for the Preparation of Teachers 1996, 63-91. Josey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. F.B. Murray (Ed.).
9. Frederiksen J.R., Collins A. A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher 1989, 18(9):27-32.
10. Haertel E.H. New forms of teacher assessment. Review of Research in Education 1991, vol. 17:3-29. American Research Association, Washington, DC. G.E. Grant (Ed.).
11. Linn R.L., Baker E., Dunbar S. Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher 1991, 23(16):1-21.
12. Lustick D., Sykes G. National board certification as professional development: What are teachers learning?. Education Policy Analysis Archives 2006, 14(5). Retrieved August, 10, 2006 from. http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n5/.
13. Mansvelder-Longayroux D.D., Beijaard D., Verloop N. The portfolio as a tool for stimulating reflection by student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education 2007, 23(1):47-62.
14. Messick S. Validity. Educational Measurement 1989, Macmillan, Washington, DC, American Council on Education. 3rd edn. R. Linn (Ed.).
15. Moss P.M. Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for performance assessment. Review of Educational Research 1992, 62(3):229-258.
16. Moss P.M. Can there be validity without reliability?. Educational Research 1994, 23(2):5-12.
17. Moss P.M., Schutz A.M., Collins K.M. An integrative approach to portfolio evaluation for teacher licensure. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 1998, 12(2):139-161.
18. Ross J.A., Bruce C.D. Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education 2007, 23(2):146-159.
19. Sadler D.R. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 1989, 18:119-144.
20. Schutz A., Moss P.A. Reasonable decisions in portfolio assessment: Evaluating complex evidence of teaching. Education Policy Analysis Archives 2004, 12(33). Retrieved August 10, 2006 from. http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n33/.
21. Shulman L.S., Haertel E., Bird T. Toward alternative assessments of teaching 1988, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, A report of work in progress (report 4-20-88). Teacher Assessment Project, School of Education.
22. Sluijsmans D.M.A., Brand-Gruwel S., Merriënboer J.J.G. Peer assessment training in teacher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2002, 27(5):443-454.
23. Uhlenbeck A.M., Verloop N., Beijaard D. Requirements for an assessment procedure for beginning teachers: Implications from recent theories on teaching and assessment. The Teachers College Record 2002, 104(2):242-272.
24. van Tartwijk J., van Driessen E., van der Vleuten C., Stokking K.M. Factors influencing the successful introduction of portfolios. Quality in Higher Education 2007, 13(1):69-79.
25. Anderson J.R., Reder L.M., Simon H.A. Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher 1996, 25(4):5-11.
26. Bird T. The schoolteacher's portfolio: An essay on possibilities. The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Assessing Elementary and Secondary School teachers 1990, 241-256. Corwin Press Inc, Newbury Park, CA. J. Millman, L.E. Darling-Hammond (Eds.).
27. Cronbach L.J. Construct validation after thirty years. Intelligence: Measurement, Theory and Public Policy. (Proceedings of a symposium in honor of Lloyd G. Humphreys) 1989, 147-171. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL. R.J. Linn (Ed.).
28. Peterson K.D. Teacher Evaluation: A Comprehensive Guide to New Directions and Practices 1995, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
29. Porter A.C., Youngs P., Odden A. Advances in teacher assessments and their uses. Handbook of Research on Teaching 2001, 259-297. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC. V. Richardson (Ed.).
30. Assessment, Testing and Evaluation in Teacher Education 1995, Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ. S.W. Soled (Ed.).
31. - Educational Testing Service (ETS). http://www.ets.org.
32. - Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT). http://www.pacttpa.org.
33. - The Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC). http://www.ccsso.org.
34. - The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards in the United States (NBPTS). http://www.nbpts.org.