An integrative approach to portfolio evaluation for teacher licensure

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 139-161

  Moss, Pamela A ^a   Schutz, Aaron M ^a   Collins, Kathleen M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54649083946     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008081027322     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alverno College Faculty. (1994). Student assessment-as-learning at Alverno College. Milwaukee, WI: Alverno College Institute.
2. Bernstein, R.J. (1985). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
3. Bleicher, J. (1980). Contemporary hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as method, philosophy, and critique. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
4. Cronbach, L.J., Linn, R.L., Brennan, R.L., & Haertel, E. (1995). Generalizability analysis for educational assessments. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation and the National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
5. Darling-Hammond, L. (1995). A license to teach: Building a profession for twenty-first-century schools. Boulder, COL: Westview Press.
6. Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action: Studies of schools and students at work. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Darling-Hammond, L., & Millman, J. (1990). The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8. Delandshere, G., & Petrosky, A.R. (1994). Capturing teachers' knowledge: Performance assessment a) and post-structuralist epistemology, b) from a post-structuralist perceptive, c) and post-structuralism, d) none of the above. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 11-18.
9. Gadamer, H.G. (1987). The problem of historical consciousness. In P. Rabinow & W.M. Sullivan (eds.), Interpretive social science: A second look (pp. 82-140). Berkeley: University of California Press. First published in 1963.
10. Good, T.L. (1996). Teaching effects and teacher evaluation. In J. Sikula (ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.) (pp. 617-665). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
11. Habermas, J. (1990). The hermeneutic claim to universality. In G.L. Ormiston & A.D. Schrift (eds.), The hermeneutic tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur (pp. 245-272). Albany: SUNY Press. First published in 1980.
12. Haertel, E.H. (1991). New forms of teacher assessment. In G. Grant (ed.), Review of Research in Education, 17, 3-29.
13. Haney, W., Madaus, G., & Kreitzer, A. (1987). Charms talismanic: Testing teachers for the improvement of American education. In E.Z. Rothkopf (ed.), Review of Research in Education, 14 (pp. 169-238). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
14. Hoy, D.C., & McCarthy, T. (1994). Critical theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC). (1992). Model standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Author and Council of Chief State School Officers.
16. Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (INTASC). (1995). Next steps: Moving towards performance-based licensing in teaching. Washington, DC: Author and Council of Chief State School Officers.
17. Jaeger, R.M. (1995). On the cognitive construction of standard-setting judgments: The case of configurai scoring. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Standard Setting in Large Scale Assessment. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board and the National Center for Education Statistics.
18. Jaeger, R.M., Mullis, I.V.S., Bourque, M., & Shakrani, S. (1995). Setting performance standards for performance assessments: Some fundamental issues, current practice, and technical dilemmas. In G. Phillips (ed.), Technical Issues in Performance Assessment. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
19. Kimball, W.H., & Hanley, S. (1995). Fair and defensible judging of teacher performance and understanding for certification and teacher improvement. Manuscript, University of Southern Maine.
20. Kogler, H. (1996). The power of dialogue: Critical hermeneutics after Gadamer and Foucault. Cambridge: MIT Press.
21. Lieberman, A. (1990). Introduction. In A. Lieberman (ed.), The changing contexts of teaching (pp. 1-10). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
22. Lieberman, A. (1995). Restructuring schools: The dynamics of changing practice, structure, and culture. In A. Lieberman (ed.), The work of restructuring schools: Building from the ground up (pp. 1-17). New York: Teachers College Press.
23. Little, Judith Warren. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129-151.
24. Lord, B. (1994). Teacher's professional development: Critical colleagueship and the role of professional communities. In N. Cobb (ed.), The future of education: Perspectives on national standards in America (pp. 175-204). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
25. Lyons, N., & Faculty of the University of Southern Maine's Extended Teacher Education Program. (1995). Which standards? What performance? For what vision of teaching and learning? Manuscript, University of Southern Maine.
26. Mabry, L. (1992). Alternative assessment in an American high school. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
27. Meier, D. (1995). The power of their ideas: Lessons for America from a small school in Harlem. Boston: Beacon Press.
28. Mislevy, R.J. (1994). Evidence and inference in educational assessment. Psychometrika, 59(4), 439-483.
29. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, (n.d.). What teachers should know and be able to do. Southfield, MI: NBPTS.
30. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1994). Report to the U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, and the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Education and Labor. Detroit, MI: Author.
31. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. Author: Washington, DC.
32. Ormiston, G.L., & Schrift, A.D. (eds.). (1990). The hermeneutic tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur. Albany: SUNY Press.
33. Richardson, Virginia. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 10-18.
34. Schmidt, L.K. (ed.). (1995). The specter of relativism: Truth, dialogue, and phronesis in philosophical hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
35. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Assessment for teaching: An initiative for the profession. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 38-44.
36. Taylor, C. (1987). Interpretation and the Sciences of Man. In P. Rabinow & W.M. Sullivan (eds.), Interpretive social science: a second look (pp. 33-81). Berkeley: University of California Press. First published in 1967.
37. Tellez, Kip. (1996). Authentic Assessment. In J. Sikula (ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.) (pp. 704-721). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
38. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward Utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Wiley, D.E., & Haertel, E.H. (1994). Extended assessment tasks: Purposes, definitions, scoring, and accuracy. In R. Mitchell & M. Kane (eds.), Implementing performance assessment: Promises, problems, and challenges. Washington, DC: Pelavin Associates.