Subcompartmentalization of extracellular extravascular space (EES) into permeability and leaky space with local arterial input function (AIF) results in improved discrimination between high- and low-grade glioma using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 677-688

  Sahoo, Prativa ^a   Rathore, Ram K S ^a   Awasthi, Rishi ^b   Roy, Bhaswati ^b   Verma, Sanjay ^a   Rathore, Divya ^a   Behari, Sanjay ^b   Husain, Mazhar ^c   Husain, Nuzhat ^d   Pandey, Chandra M ^b   Mohakud, Sudipta ^b   Gupta, Rakesh K ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

^b SANJAY GANDHI POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

^c Sahara Hospital   (India)

^d DR Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences Lucknow   (India)

Author keywords

DCE MRI; general tracer kinetic model; glioma; leaky tracer kinetic model; local AIF

Indexed keywords

TRACER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; EXTRAVASCULAR SPACE; FEMALE; GLIOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PLASMA CONCENTRATION-TIME CURVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

DCE-MRI; GENERAL TRACER KINETIC MODEL; GLIOMA; LEAKY TRACER KINETIC MODEL; LOCAL AIF;

ADULT; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CEREBRAL ARTERIES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; GLIOMA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEOPLASM GRADING; PERMEABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84878520053     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24021     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 2007; 114: 97-109.
2. Jackson A, Buckley D, Parker GJM,. Dynamic contrast enhanced imaging in oncology. Berlin, London: Springer; 2004.
3. Aronen HJ, Gazit IE, Louis DN, et al. Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. Radiology 1994; 191: 41-51.
4. Awasthi R, Pandey CM, Sahoo P, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived Kep as a potential biomarker of matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a pilot study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2012; 36: 125-130.
5. trans) is a surrogate marker of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) expression in brain tuberculomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 588-597.
6. Haris M, Husain N, Singh A, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced derived cerebral blood volume correlates better with leak correction than with no correction for vascular endothelial growth factor, microvascular density, and grading of astrocytoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008; 32: 955-965.
7. Kety SS,. The theory and applications of the exchange of inert gas at the lungs and tissues. Pharmacol Rev 1951; 3: 1-41.
8. Tofts PS,. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 91-101.
9. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced t1-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 223-232.
10. Donaldson SB, West CML, Davidson SE, et al. A comparison of tracer kinetic models for T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: application in carcinoma of the cervix. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 691-700.
11. Sourbron SP, Buckley DL,. Tracer kinetic modelling in MRI: estimating perfusion and capillary permeability. Phys Med Biol 2012; 57: R1-33.
12. Li KL, Zhu XP, Checkley DR, et al. Simultaneous mapping of blood volume and endothelial permeability surface area product in gliomas using iterative analysis of first-pass dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data. Br J Radiology 2003; 76: 39-50.
13. Patlak CS, Blasberg RG, Fenstermacher JD,. Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1983; 3: 1-7.
14. Kassner A, Roberts T, Taylor K, Silver F, Mikulis D,. Prediction of hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke using permeability MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 2213-2217.
15. Østergaard L, Sorensen AG, Kwong KK, Weisskoff RM, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR,. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part II: Experimental comparison and preliminary results. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 726-736.
16. Østergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR,. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 715-725.
17. Singh A, Haris M, Rathore D, et al. Quantification of physiological and hemodynamic indices using T1 dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in intracranial mass lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26: 871-880.
18. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A,. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 466-473.
19. Alsop DC, Wedmid A, Schlaug G,. Defining a local input function for perfusion quantification with bolus contrast MRI. In: Proc 10th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Honolulu; 2002 (abstract 659).
20. Calamante F, MâŠ̃rup M, Hansen LK,. Defining a local arterial input function for perfusion MRI using independent component analysis. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 789-797.
21. Lorenz C, Benner T, Chen PJ, et al. Automated perfusion-weighted MRI using localized arterial input functions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 1133-1139.
22. Singh A, Rathore RKS, Haris M, Verma SK, Husain N, Gupta RK,. Improved bolus arrival time and arterial input function estimation for tracer kinetic analysis in DCE-MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29: 166-176.
23. Rathore RKS, Singh A, Gupta RK, et al. Voxel-wise exact T1 estimation for accurate quantitation of perfusion indices using fast 3D-SPGR in intracranial mass lesion. In: Proc 14th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Seattle; 2006 (abstract 1538).
24. Ahearn TS, Staff RT, Redpath TW, Semple SIK,. The use of the Levenberg-Marquardt curve-fitting algorithm in pharmacokinetic modelling of DCE-MRI data. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50: N85.
25. Marquardt D,. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM J Numer Anal 1963; 15: 977-992.
26. Draper NR, Smith H,. Applied regression analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
27. Ewing JR, Brown SL, Lu M, et al. Model selection in magnetic resonance imaging measurements of vascular permeability: gadomer in a 9L model of rat cerebral tumor. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2006; 26: 310-320.
28. Brix G, Zwick S, Kiessling F, Griebel J,. Pharmacokinetic analysis of tissue microcirculation using nested models: multimodel inference and parameter identifiability. Med Phys 2009; 36: 2923-2933.
29. Folkman J,. Role of angiogenesis in tumor growth and metastasis. Semin Oncol 2002; 29: 15-18.
30. Carmeliet P, Jain RK,. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature 2000; 407: 249-257.
31. Awasthi R, Rathore RK, Soni P, et al. Discriminant analysis to classify glioma grading using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and immunohistochemical markers. Neuroradiology 2012; 54: 205-213.