Prevention of pea lodging by intercropping barley with peas at different nitrogen fertilization levels

Field Crops Research

Volumn 149, Issue , 2013, Pages 95-104

  Podgórska Lesiak, Magdalena ^a   Sobkowicz, Piotr ^a  

^a WROC AW UNIVERSITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

Author keywords

Barley pea intercrop; Competition; Facilitation; LER; Plant lodging

Indexed keywords

BARLEY; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); CROP YIELD; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GROWTH RATE; INTERCROPPING; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; MATURATION; VEGETABLE;

FIDELIA; HORDEUM; HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE; PISUM SATIVUM;

EID: 84878518506     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.04.023     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Altieri M.A. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 1999, 74:19-31.
2. Andersen M.K., Hauggaard-Nielsen H., Ambus P., Jensen E.S. Biomass production, symbiotic nitrogen fixation and inorganic N use in dual and tri-component annual intercrops. Plant Soil 2004, 266:273-287.
3. Annicchiarico P., Iannucci A. Adaptation strategy, germplasm type and adaptive traits for field pea improvement in Italy based on variety responses across climatically contrasting environments. Field Crops Res. 2008, 108:133-142.
4. Bedoussac L., Justes E. A comparison of commonly used indices for evaluating species interactions and intercrop efficiency: application to durum wheat-winter pea intercrops. Field Crops Res. 2011, 124:25-36.
5. Belcher J.W., Keddy P.A., Twolan-Strut L. Root and shoot competition intensity along a soil depth gradient. J. Ecol. 1995, 83:673-682.
6. Berntsen J., Hauggaard-Nielsen H., Olsen J.E., Petersen B.M., Jensen E.S., Thomsen A. Modelling dry matter production and resource use in intercrops of pea and barley. Field Crops Res. 2004, 88:69-83.
7. Brooker R.W., Maestre F.T., Callaway R.M., Lortie C.L., Cavieres L.A., Kunstler G., Liancourt P., Tielbörger K., Travis J.M.J., Anthelme F., Armas C., Coll L., Corcet E., Delzon S., Forey E., Kikvidze Z., Olofsson J., Pugnaire F., Quiroz C.L., Saccone P., Schiffers K., Seifan M., Touzard B., Michalet R. Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. J. Ecol. 2008, 96:18-34.
8. Bruno J.F., Stachowicz J.J., Bertness M.D. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18:119-125.
9. Bulson H.A.J., Snaydon R.W., Stopes C.E. Effects of plant density on intercropped wheat and field beans in an organic farming system. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 1997, 128:59-71.
10. Callaway R.M. Positive interactions among plants. Botanical Rev. 1995, 61:306-349.
11. Callaway R.M., Walker L.R. Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 1997, 78:1958-1965.
12. Chen C., Westcott M., Neill K., Wichman D., Knox M. Row configuration and nitrogen application for barley-pea intercropping in Montana. Agron. J. 2004, 96:1730-1738.
13. Cochran V.L., Schlentner S.F. Intercropped oat and fababean in Alaska: dry matter production, dinitrogen fixation, nitrogen transfer, and nitrogen fertilizer response. Agron. J. 1995, 87:420-424.
14. Corre-Hellou G., Brisson N., Launay M., Fustec J., Crozat Y. Effect of root depth penetration on soil nitrogen competitive interactions and dry matter production in pea-barley intercrops given different soil nitrogen supplies. Field Crops Res. 2007, 103:76-85.
15. Corre-Hellou G., Dibet A., Hauggaard-Nielsen H., Crozat Y., Gooding M., Ambus P., Dahlmann C., von Fragstein P., Pristeri A., Monti M., Jensen E.S. The competitive ability of pea-barley intercrops against weeds and the interactions with crop productivity and soil N availability. Field Crops Res. 2011, 122:264-272.
16. 2 fixation, leaf expansion and crop growth in pea-barley intercrops. Plant Soil 2006, 282:195-208.
17. Fridley J.D. The influence of species diversity on ecosystem productivity: how, where and why?. Oikos 2001, 93:514-526.
18. Gibson D.J., Connolly J., Hartnett D.C., Weidenhamer J.D. Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plants. J. Ecol. 1999, 87:1-16.
19. Gomez K.A., Gomez A.A. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. An International Rice Research Institute Book 1984, 680. A Wiley-Interscience Publication. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 2nd ed.
20. Hauggaard-Nielsen H., Ambus P., Jensen E.S. Interspecific competition, N use and interference with weeds in pea-barley intercropping. Field Crops Res. 2001, 70:101-109.
21. 32P technique. Plant Soil 2001, 236:63-74.
22. 2-fixation, soil N acquisition and use of other nutrients in European organic cropping systems. Field Crops Res. 2009, 113:64-71.
23. Hauggaard-Nielsen H., Jensen E.S. Evaluating pea and barley cultivars for complementarity in intercropping at different levels of soil N availability. Field Crops Res. 2001, 72:185-196.
24. Hauggaard-Nielsen H., Jensen E.S. Facilitative root interactions in intercrops. Plant Soil 2005, 274:237-250.
25. Holmgren M., Scheffer M., Huston M.A. The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communities. Ecology 1997, 78:1966-1975.
26. Iptas S. Effects of row spacing, support plant species and support plant mixture ratio on seed yield and yield characteristics of Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2002, 188:357-362.
27. 2 fixation and interspecific competition for inorganic N in pea-barley intercrops. Plant Soil 1996, 182:25-38.
28. Jensen E.S. Barley uptake of N deposited in the rhizosphere of associated field pea. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1996, 28:159-168.
29. Jolliffe P.A. The replacement series. J. Ecol. 2000, 88:371-385.
30. Kontturi M., Laine A., Niskanen M., Hurme T., Hyövelä M., Peltonen-Sainio P. Pea-oat intercrops to sustain lodging resistance and yield formation in northern European conditions. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B 2011, 61:612-621.
31. Li B., Watkinson A.R. Competition along a nutrient gradient: a case study with Daucus carota and Chenopodium album. Ecol. Res. 2000, 15:293-306.
32. Mead R., Willey R.W. The concept of a "land equivalent ratio" and advantages in yields from intercropping. Expl. Agric. 1980, 16:217-228.
33. Peltzer D.A., Wilson S.D., Gerry A.K. Competition intensity along a productivity gradient in low-diversity grassland. Am. Nat. 1998, 151:465-476.
34. Rauber R., Schmidtke K., Kimpel-Freund H. The performance of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and its role in determining yield advantages in mixed stands of pea and oat (Avena sativa L.). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2001, 187:137-144.
35. Revilla-Molina I.M., Bastiaans L., Van Keulen H., Kropff M.J., Hui F., Castilla N.P., Mew T.W., Zhu Y.Y., Leung H. Does resource complementarity or prevention of lodging contribute to the increased productivity of rice varietal mixtures in Yunnan, China?. Field Crops Res. 2009, 111:303-307.
36. Schouls J., Langelaan J.G. Lodging and yield of dry peas (Pisum sativum L.) as influenced by various mixing ratios of a conventional and a semi-leafless cultivar. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 1994, 172:207-214.
37. Semere T., Froud-Williams R. The effect of pea cultivar and water stress on root and shoot competition between vegetative plants of maize and pea. J. Appl. Ecol. 2001, 38:137-145.
38. Schmidtke K., Neumann A., Hof C., Rauber R. Soil and atmospheric nitrogen uptake by lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. nudum L.) as monocrops and intercrops. Field Crops Res. 2004, 87:245-256.
39. Sobkowicz P., Tendziagolska E. Competition and productivity in mixture of oats and wheat. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2005, 191:377-385.
40. Spies J.M., Warkentin T.D., Shirtliffe S.J. Variation in field pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars for basal branching and weed competition. Weed Sci. 2011, 59:218-223.
41. Stapper M., Fischer R.A. Genotype, sowing date and plant spacing influence on high-yielding irrigated wheat in southern New South Wales, II. Growth, yield and nitrogen use. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1990, 41:1021-1041.
42. Stern W.R. Nitrogen fixation and transfer in intercrop systems. Field Crops Res. 1993, 34:335-356.
43. Tofinga M.P., Paolini R., Snaydon R.W. A study of root and shoot interactions between cereals and peas in mixtures. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 1993, 120:13-24.
44. Uzun A., Açikgöz E. Effect of sowing season and seeding rate on the morphological traits and yields in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 1998, 181:215-222.
45. Uzun A., Bilgili U., Sincik M., Filya I., Acikgoz E. Yield and quality of forage type pea lines of contrasting leaf types. Eur. J. Agron. 2005, 22:85-94.
46. Vandermeer J. The Ecology of Intercropping 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
47. Wang T.F., Gossen B.D., Slinkard A.E. Lodging increases severity and impact of mycosphaerella blight on field pea. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2006, 86:855-863.
48. Weigelt A., Jolliffe P. Indices of plant competition. J. Ecol. 2003, 91:707-720.
49. Willey R.W., Rao M.R. A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Expl. Agric. 1980, 16:117-125.
50. Wilson J.B. Shoot competition and root competition. J. Appl. Ecol. 1988, 25:279-296.
51. Zhang F., Li L. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant Soil 2003, 248:305-312.