Frequency-specific adaptation in human auditory cortex depends on the spectral variance in the acoustic stimulation

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 109, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 2086-2096

  Herrmann, Björn ^a   Henry, Molly J ^a   Obleser, Jonas ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; Frequency specific adaptation; N1 component; Shortterm plasticity

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE POTENTIAL; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; SOUND;

EID: 84878486393     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00907.2012     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ahveninen J, Hämäläinen MS, Jääskeläinen IP, Ahlfors SP, Huang S, Lin FH, Raij T, Sams M, Vasios CE, Belliveau JW. Attention-driven auditorycortex short-term plasticity helps segregate relevant sounds from noise. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 4182-4187, 2011.
2. Bakeman R. Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behav Res Methods 37: 379-384, 2005.
3. Bartlett EL, Sadagopan S, Wang X. Fine frequency tuning in monkey auditory cortex and thalamus. J Neurophysiol 106: 849-859, 2011.
4. Bäuerle P, von der Behrens W, Kössl M, Gaese BH. Stimulus-specific adaptation in the gerbil primary auditory thalamus is the result of a fast frequency-specific habituation and is regulated by the corticofugal system. J Neurosci 31: 9708-9722, 2011.
5. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 57: 289-300, 1995.
6. Bitterman Y, Mukamel R, Malach R, Fried I, Nelken I. Ultra-fine frequency tuning revealed in single neurons of human auditory cortex. Nature 451: 197-201, 2008.
7. Boutros NN, Belger A. Midlatency evoked potentials attenuation and augmentation reflect different aspects of sensory gating. Biol Psychol 45: 917-922, 1999.
8. Butler RA. Effect of changes in stimulus frequency and intensity on habituation of the human vertex potential. J Acoust Soc Am 44: 945-950, 1968.
9. Buzsáki G, Anastassiou CA, Koch C. The origin of extracellular fields and currents-EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat Rev Neurosci 13: 407-420, 2012.
10. Costa-Faidella J, Grimm S, Slabu L, Diaz-Santaella F, Escera C. Multiple time scales of adaptation in the auditory system as revealed by human evoked potentials. Psychophysiology 48: 774-783, 2011.
11. Dahmen JC, Hartley DE, King AJ. Stimulus-timing-dependent plasticity of cortical frequency representation. J Neurosci 28: 13629-13639, 2008.
12. Dahmen JC, Keating P, Nodal FR, Schulz AL, King AJ. Adaptation to stimulus statistics in the perception and neural representation of auditory space. Neuron 66: 937-948, 2010.
13. Dean I, Harper NS, McAlpine D. Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics. Nat Neurosci 8: 1684-1689, 2005.
14. Dean I, Robinson BL, Harper NS, McAlpine D. Rapid neural adaptation to sound level statistics. J Neurosci 28: 6430-6438, 2008.
15. Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 15: 870-880, 2002.
16. Gorny JL, Butler RA. An evoked response study of the first-order difference tone in man. Acta Otolaryngol 80: 1-6, 1975.
17. Greenhouse SW, Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24: 95-112, 1959.
18. Hari R, Kaila K, Katila T, Tuomisto T, Varpula T. Interstimulus interval dependence of the auditory vertex response and its magnetic counterpart: implications for their neural generation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuro-physiol 54: 561-569, 1982.
19. Hillyard SA, Hink RF, Schwent VL, Picton TW. Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science 182: 177-180, 1973.
20. Hu B. Functional organization of lemniscal and nonlemniscal auditory thalamus. Exp Brain Res 153: 543-549, 2003.
21. Jääskeläinen IP, Ahveninen J, Andermann ML, Belliveau JW, Raij T, Sams M. Short-term plasticity as a neural mechanism supporting memory and attentional functions. Brain Res 1422: 66-81, 2011.
22. Jääskeläinen IP, Ahveninen J, Belliveau JW, Raij T, Sams M. Short-term plasticity in auditory cognition. Trends Neurosci 30: 653-661, 2007.
23. Kvale MN, Schreiner CE. Short-term adaptation of auditory receptive fields to dynamic stimuli. J Neurophysiol 91: 604-612, 2004.
24. Leek MR. Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research. Percept Psychophys 63: 1279-1292, 2001.
25. Loveless N, Hari R, Hämäläinen MS, Tiihonen J. Evoked responses of human auditory cortex may be enhanced by preceding stimuli. Electroen-cephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 74: 217-227, 1989.
26. Lu ZL, Williamson SJ, Kaufman L. Behavioral lifetime of human auditory sensory memory predicted by physiological measures. Science 258: 1688-1670, 1992a.
27. Lu ZL, Williamson SJ, Kaufman L. Human auditory primary and association cortex have differing lifetimes for activation traces. Brain Res 572: 236-241, 1992b.
28. Maess B, Jacobsen T, Schröger E, Friederici AD. Localizing pre-attentive auditory memory-based comparison: magnetic mismatch negativity to pitch change. Neuroimage 37: 561-571, 2007.
29. Makeig S, Westerfield M, Jung TP, Enghoff S, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Sejnowski TJ. Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science 295: 690-694, 2002.
30. Mäkelä JP, Ahonen A, Hämäläinen MS, Hari R, Ilmoniemi RJ, Kajola M, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa OV, McEvoy L, Salmelin R, Salonen O, Sams M, Simola J, Tesche C, Vasama JP. Functional differences between auditory cortices of the two hemispheres revealed by whole-head neuromagnetic recordings. Hum Brain Mapp 1: 48-56, 1993.
31. May PJ, Tiitinen H, Ilmoniemi RJ, Nyman G, Taylor JG, Näätänen R. Frequency change detection in human auditory cortex. J Comput Neurosci 6: 99-120, 1999.
32. McEvoy L, Levänen S, Loveless N. Temporal characteristics of auditory sensory memory: neuromagnetic evidence. Psychophysiology 34: 308-316, 1997.
33. Montgomery N, Wehr M. Auditory cortical neurons convey maximal stimulus-specific information at their best frequency. J Neurosci 30: 13362-13366, 2010.
34. Näätänen R, Picton TW. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24: 375-425, 1987.
35. Näätänen R, Sams M, Alho K, Paavilainen P, Reinikainen K, Sokolov EN. Frequency and location specificity of the human vertex N1 wave. Electro-encephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 69: 523-531, 1988.
36. Okamoto H, Stracke H, Wolters CH, Schmael F, Pantev C. Attention improves population-level frequency tuning in human auditory cortex. J Neurosci 27: 10383-10390, 2007.
37. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97-113, 1971.
38. Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen JM. FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011: Article ID 156869, 2011.
39. Pantev C, Hoke M, Lehnertz K, Lütkenhöner B, Anogianakis G, Witt-kowski W. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 69: 160-170, 1988.
40. Picton TW, Woods DL, Proulx GB. Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 45: 198-210, 1978.
41. Reyes AD. Synaptic short-term plasticity in auditory cortical circuits. Hear Res 279: 60-66, 2011.
42. Rosburg T. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields. Clin Neurophysiol 115: 898-905, 2004.
43. Rosburg T, Trautner P, Korzyukov OA, Boutros NN, Schaller C, Elger CE, Kurthen M. Short-term habituation of the intracranially recorded auditory evoked potentials P50 and N100. Neurosci Lett 372: 245-249, 2004.
44. Rosburg T, Zimmerer K, Huonker R. Short-term habituation of auditory evoked potential and neuromagnetic field components in dependence of the interstimulus interval. Exp Brain Res 205: 559-570, 2010.
45. Sams M, Hari R, Rif J, Knuutila J. The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10 sec: neuromagnetic evidence. J Cogn Neurosci 5: 363-370, 1993.
46. Scholl B, Gao X, Wehr M. Level dependence of contextual modulation in auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 99: 1616-1627, 2008.
47. Schwent VL, Hillyard SA, Galambos R. Selective attention and the auditory vertex potential. II. Effects of signal intensity and masking noise. Electro-encephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 40: 615-622, 1976.
48. Smulders FT. Simplifying jackknifing of ERPs and getting more out of it: retrieving estimates of participants' latencies. Psychophysiology 47: 387-392, 2010.
49. Studebaker GA. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res 28: 455-462, 1985.
50. Taaseh N, Yaron A, Nelken I. Stimulus-specific adaptation and deviance detection in the rat auditory cortex. PloS One 6: e23369, 2011.
51. Tang J, Yang W, Suga N. Modulation of thalamic auditory neurons by the primary auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 108: 935-942, 2012.
52. Tavabi K, Obleser J, Dobel C, Pantev C. Auditory evoked fields differentially encode speech features: an MEG investigation of the P50m and N100m time courses during syllable processing. Eur J Neurosci 25: 3155-3162, 2007.
53. Ulanovsky N, Las L, Farkas D, Nelken I. Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons. J Neurosci 24: 10440-10453, 2004.
54. Ulanovsky N, Las L, Nelken I. Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nat Neurosci 6: 391-398, 2003.
55. von der Behrens W, Bäuerle P, Kössl M, Gaese BH. Correlating stimulus-specific adaptation of cortical neurons and local field potentials in the awake rat. J Neurosci 29: 13837-13849, 2009.
56. Wolff C, Schröger E. Activation of the auditory pre-attentive change detection system by tone repetitions with fast stimulation rate. Cogn Brain Res 10: 323-327, 2001.
57. Zouridakis G, Boutros NN. Stimulus parameter effects on the P50 evoked response. Biol Psychiatry 32: 839-841, 1992.