Short-Term Adaptation of Auditory Receptive Fields to Dynamic Stimuli

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 604-612

  Kvale, Mark N ^a,b   Schreiner, Christoph E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CAT; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; NERVE CONDUCTION; NERVE POTENTIAL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SENSORY SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; CATS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0842327887     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00484.2003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abbas PJ and Gorga MP. AP responses in forward-masking paradigms and their relationshp to responses of auditory-nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 69: 492-499, 1981.
2. Abbott LF, Varela JA, Sen K, and Nelson SB. Synaptic depression and cortical gain control. Science 275: 220-224, 1997.
3. Chimento TC and Schreiner CE. Time course of adaptation and recovery from adaptation in the cat auditory nerve neurophonic. J Acoust Soc Am 88: 857-864, 1990.
4. Chimento TC and Schreiner CE. Adaptation and recovery from adaptation in single fiber responses of the cat auditory nerve. J Acoust Soc Am 90: 263-273, 1991.
5. DeWeese M and Zador A. Asymmetric dynamics in optimal variance adaptation. Neural Comput 10: 1179-1202, 1998.
6. Eggermont JJ and Spoor A. Cochlear adaptation in the guinea pig. Audiology 12: 193-220, 1982.
7. Escabi MA and Schreiner C. Nonlinear spectrotemporal sound analysis by neurons in the auditory midbrain. J Neurosci 22: 4114-4131, 2002.
8. Findlayson PG and Adam TJ. Short-term adaptation of excitation and inhibition shapes binaural processing. Acta Otolaryngol 117: 187-191, 1997.
9. Goldberg MJ and Brown PB. Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. J Neurophysiol 32: 613-636, 1969.
10. Golomb SW. Shift Register Sequences. Laguna Hills, CA: Aegean Park Press, 1982.
11. Harris DM and Dallos P. Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses. J Neurophysiol 42: 1083-1107, 1979.
12. Huang C. Time constants of acoustic adaptation. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 52: 394-399, 1981.
13. Kiang NYS, Watanabe T, Thomas EC, and Clark LF. Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat Auditory Nerve. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965.
14. Krishna BS and Semple MN. Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 84: 255-273, 2000.
15. Kvale M and Schreiner CE. Perturbative m-sequences for auditory systems identification. Acta Acustica 81: 653-658, 1997.
16. Langner G and Schreiner CE. Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 60: 1799-1822, 1988.
17. Lewicki MS. Bayesian modeling and classification of neural signals. Neural Comput 6: 1005-1029, 1994.
18. Malone BJ and Semple MN. Effects of auditory stimulus context on the representation of frequency in the gerbil inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 86: 1113-1130, 2001.
19. Marmarelis PZ and Marmarelis VZ. Analysis of Physiological Systems. New York: Plenum, 1978.
20. Oliver DL and Morest DK. The central nucleus of the inferior colliculus in the cat. J Comp Neurol 222: 237-264, 1984.
21. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, and Flannery BP. Numerical Recipes in C. New York: Cambridge, 1992.
22. Rees A and Moller AR. Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat to am and fm tones. Hear Res 10: 301-330, 1983.
23. Rhode WS and Smith PH. Characteristics of tone-pip response patterns in relationship to spontaneous rate in cat auditory fibers. Hear Res 18: 159-168, 1985.
24. Schreiner CE, Mendelson JR, and Sutter ML. Functional topography of cat primary auditory cortex: representation of tone intensity. Exp Brain Res 94: 65-87, 1992.
25. Smirnakis SM, Berry MJ, Warland DK, Bialek W, and Meister M. Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale. Nature 386: 69-73, 1997.
26. Smith RL. Adaptation, saturation, and physiological masking in single auditory nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 65: 166-177, 1979.
27. Smith RL and Brachman ML. Dynamic response of single auditory nerve fibers: some effects of intensity and time. In: Psycophysical, Physiological and Behavioral Studies in Hearing, edited by G van Brink and FA Bilsen. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University Press. 1980a, p. 312-319.
28. Smith RL and Brachman ML. Operating range and maximum response of single auditory nerve fibers. Brain Res 184: 499-505, 1980b.
29. Smith RL and Zwislocki JJ. Short-term adaptation and incremental responses of single auditory nerve fibers. Biol Cybern 17: 169-182, 1975.
30. Sokal RR and Rohlf FJ. Biometry (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Freeman, 1981.
31. Sokolich R. U. S. Patent 4, 251: 686, 1981.
32. Spoor A, Eggermont JJ, and Odenthal DW. Comparison of human and animal data concerning adaptation and masking of eighth nerve compound action potential. In: Electrocochleography, edited by RJ Ruber, J Elberling, and G Solomon G. Baltimore, MD: University Park, 1976, pp 183-198.
33. Ulanovsky N, Las L, and Nelken I. Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nat Neurosci 6: 330-332, 2003.
34. Westerman LA. Adaptation and Recovery of Auditory Nerve Responses (PhD thesis). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, 1985.
35. Westerman LA and Smith RL. Rapid and short-term adaptation in auditory nerve responses. Hear Res 15: 249-260, 1984.