The uncertainty associated with estimating future groundwater recharge: A summary of recent research and an example from a small unconfined aquifer in a northern humid-continental climate

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 492, Issue , 2013, Pages 244-253

  Kurylyk, Barret L ^a   MacQuarrie, Kerry T B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Climate change; Climate scenarios; Downscaling; Groundwater recharge; Snowmelt; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE SCENARIOS; DOWN-SCALING; GROUND WATER RECHARGE; SNOWMELT; UNCERTAINTY;

AQUIFERS; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE MODELS; DIGITAL STORAGE; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; METEOROLOGY; RESEARCH; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

RECHARGING (UNDERGROUND WATERS);

ALGORITHM; GROUNDWATER FLOW; GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; HUMID ENVIRONMENT; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; RECHARGE; SIMULATION; SOIL WATER; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; UNCONFINED AQUIFER; WATER BUDGET;

EID: 84878474673     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.043     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Aguilera H., Murillo J. The effect of possible climate change on natural groundwater recharge based on a simple model: a study of four karstic aquifers in SE Spain. Environ. Geol. 2009, 57:963-974.
2. Ali R., McFarlane D., Varma S., Dawes W., Emelyanova I., Hodgson G. Potential climate change impacts on the water balance of regional unconfined aquifer systems in south-western Australia. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 16:4581-4601.
3. Allard, S., 2008. Otter Brook Granular Aggregate Deposit (NTS 21 J/16), North-Central New Brunswick: Geotechnical Data and Ground-penetrating Radar Survey Results. New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources Open File Report 2008-10.
4. Allen R.G. Self-calibrating method for estimating solar radiation from air temperature. J. Hydrol. Eng. 1997, 2:56-67.
5. Allen D.M., Cannon A.J., Toews M.W., Scibek J. Variability in simulated recharge using different GCMs. Water Resour. Res. 2010, 46:W00F03.
6. Balland V., Pollacco J.A.P., Arp P.A. Modeling soil hydraulic properties for a wide range of soil conditions. Ecol. Model. 2008, 219:300-316.
7. Berger K. Validation of the hydrologic evaluation of landfill performance (HELP) model for simulating the water balance of cover systems. Environ. Geol. 2000, 39:1261-1274.
8. Chen Z., Grasby S.E., Osadetz K.G. Relation between climate variability and groundwater levels in the upper carbonate aquifer, southern Manitoba, Canada. J. Hydrol. 2004, 290:43-62.
9. Crosbie R.S., McCallum J.L., Walker G.R., Chiew F.H.S. Modelling climate-change impacts on groundwater recharge in the Murray-Darling basin, Australia. Hydrogeol. J. 2010, 18:1639-1656.
10. Crosbie R.S., Dawes W.R., Charles S.P., Mpelasoka F.S., Aryal S., Barron O., et al. Differences in future recharge estimates due to GCMs, downscaling methods and hydrological models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2011, 38:L11406.
11. Crosbie R.S., Pickett T., Mpelasoka F.S., Hodgson G., Charles S.P., Barron O. Diffuse recharge across Australia under a 2050 climate: Modelling results 2011, CSIRO: Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship Report, 64pp.
12. Crosbie R., Pickett T., Mpelasoka F., Hodgson G., Charles S., Barron O. An assessment of the climate change impacts on groundwater recharge at a continental scale using a probabilistic approach with an ensemble of GCMs. Clim. Change 2013, 117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0558-6.
13. Crosbie R.S., McCallum J.L., Walker G.R., Chiew F.H.S. Episodic recharge and climate change in the Murray-Darling basin, Australia. Hydrogeol. J. 2012, 20:245-261.
14. Cunjak, R.A., Caissie, D., El-Jabi, N., 1990. The Catamaran Brook Habitat Research Project: Description and General Design of Study. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1751.
15. Cunjak, R.A., Caissie, D., El-Jabi, N., Hardie, P., Conlon, J.H., Pollock, T.L., et al., 1993. The Catamaran Brook (New Brunswick) Habitat Research Project: Biological, Physical, and Chemical Conditions (1990-1992). Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1914.
16. Dams J., Salvadore E., Van Daele T., Ntegeka V., Willems P., Batelaan O. Spatio-temporal impact of climate change on the groundwater system. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 16:1517-1531.
17. de Elia R., Caya D., Cote H., Frigon A., Biner S., Giguere M., et al. Evaluation of uncertainties in the CRCM-simulated North American climate. Clim. Dyn. 2008, 30:113-132.
18. Döll P. Vulnerability to the impact of climate change on renewable groundwater resources: a global-scale assessment. Environ. Res. Lett. 2009, 4:035006.
19. EC,. Environment Canada Historical Weather Database. <> (accessed October, 2011). http://www.climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca.
20. EC, 2010b. Environment Canada Adjusted and Homogenized Daily Canadian Climate Data. <> (accessed 07/20 2011). http://www.ec.gc.ca/dccha-ahccd/default.asp.
21. 2 concentrations and canopy structure. Agric. Water Manage. 2010, 97:1039-1050.
22. Green T.R., Bates B.C., Charles S.P., Fleming P.M. Physically based simulation of potential effects of carbon dioxide-altered climates on groundwater recharge. Vadose Zone J. 2007, 6:597-609.
23. Green T.R., Taniguchi M., Kooi H., Gurdak J.J., Allen D.M., Hiscock K.M., et al. Beneath the surface of global change: impacts of climate change on groundwater. J. Hydrol. 2011, 405:532-560.
24. Gulden L.E., Rosero E., Yang Z., Rodell M., Jackson C.S., Niu G., et al. Improving land-surface model hydrology: is an explicit aquifer model better than a deeper soil profile?. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007, 34:09402.
25. Hargreaves G.H., Samani Z.A. Estimating potential evapotranspiration. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. ASCE 1982, 108:225-230.
26. Hazen, A., 1892. Some Physical Properties of Sands and Gravels, with Special Reference to their Use in Filtration. 24th Annual Report, Massachusetts State Board of Health, pp. 539-556.
27. Hazen, A., 1911. Discussions of 'Dams on Sand Foundations' by A.C. Koenig. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineering, pp. 199-203.
28. Herrera-Pantoja M., Hiscock K.M. The effects of climate change on potential groundwater recharge in Great Britain. Hydrol. Process. 2008, 22:73-86.
29. Holman I. Climate change impacts on groundwater recharge- uncertainty, shortcomings, and the way forward?. Hydrogeol. J. 2006, 14:637-647.
30. Holman I.P., Allen D.M., Cuthbert M.O., Goderniaux P. Towards best practice for assessing the impacts of climate change on groundwater. Hydrogeol. J. 2012, 20:1-4.
31. Holman I.P., Tascone D., Hess T.M. A comparison of stochastic and deterministic downscaling methods for modelling potential groundwater recharge under climate change in East Anglia, UK: implications for groundwater resource management. Hydrogeol. J. 2009, 17:1629-1641.
32. Huard, D., 2011. Climate Change Scenarios: Thermal Refuge for Salmonids. Ouranos Consortium on Regional Climatology and Adaption to Climate Change Report 2011-02.
33. Hughes J.D., Petrone K.C., Silberstein R.P. Drought, groundwater storage and stream flow decline in southwestern Australia. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2012, 39:L03408.
34. Jackson C.R., Meister R., Prudhomme C. Modelling the effects of climate change and its uncertainty on UK chalk groundwater resources from an ensemble of global climate model projections. J. Hydrol. 2011, 399:12-28.
35. Jeong D.I., St-Hilaire A., Ouarda T.B., Gachon P. Multisite statistical downscaling model for daily precipitation combined by multivariate multiple linear regression and stochastic weather generator. Clim. Change 2012, 114:567-591.
36. Jeong D.I., St-Hilaire A., Ouarda T.B., Gachon P. A multivariate, multi-site statistical downscaling model for daily maximum and minimum temperatures. Clim. Res. 2012, 54:129-148.
37. Jones, A.R., 1997. Characterization of Shallow Groundwater and Investigation of the Pre- and Post-harvest Water Table Response at Selected Sites in the Catamaran Brook Watershed in Central N.B. MScE Thesis, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB.
38. Jyrkama M.I., Sykes J.F. The impact of climate change on spatially varying groundwater recharge in the Grand River watershed (Ontario). J. Hydrol. 2007, 338:237-250.
39. Kay A.L., Davies H.N., Bell V.A., Jones R.G. Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England. Clim. Change 2009, 92:41-63.
40. Kingston D.G., Taylor R.G. Sources of uncertainty in climate change impacts on river discharge and groundwater in a headwater catchment of the Upper Nile basin, Uganda. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2010, 14:1297-1308.
41. Kundzewicz Z.W., Mata L.J., Arnell N.W., Döll P., Kabat P., Jiménez B., et al. Freshwater resources and their management. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contributions of the Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, 173-210. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Paluticof, P.J. van der Linden, C.E. Hanson (Eds.).
42. Kundzewicz Z.W., Döll P. Will groundwater ease freshwater stress under climate change?. Hydrol. Sci. J. - J. Des Sci. Hydrol. 2009, 54:665-675.
43. Lavergne, C., Hunter, M., 1982. Granular Aggregate Resources of Newcastle (21 I/13), Doaktown (21 J/9) and McKendrick Lake (21 J/16). Natural Resources New Brunswick Report # 82-3.
44. Leterme B., Mallants D., Jacques D. Sensitivity of groundwater recharge using climatic analogues and HYDRUS-1D. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 16:2485-2497.
45. Liggett J.E., Allen D.M. Comparing approaches for modeling spatially distributed direct recharge in a semi-arid region (Okanagan basin, Canada). Hydrogeol. J. 2010, 18:339-357.
46. Maraun D., Wetterhall F., Ireson A.M., Chandler R.E., Kendon E.J., Widmann M., et al. Precipitation downscaling under climate change: recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Rev. Geophys. 2010, 48:RG3003.
47. Maxwell R.M., Kollet S.J. Interdependence of groundwater dynamics and land-energy feedbacks under climate change. Nat. Geosci. 2008, 1:665-669.
48. McCallum J.L., Crosbie R.S., Walker G.R., Dawes W.R. Impacts of climate change on groundwater in Australia: a sensitivity analysis of recharge. Hydrogeol. J. 2010, 18:1625-1638.
49. Meehl G.A., Covey C., Delworth T., Latif M., McAvaney B., Mitchell J.F.B., et al. The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset - a new era in climate change research. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2007, 88:1383-1394.
50. Mileham L., Taylor R.G., Todd M., Tindimugaya C., Thompson J. The impact of climate change on groundwater recharge and runoff in a humid, equatorial catchment: sensitivity of projections to rainfall intensity. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2009, 54:727-738.
51. Special report on emissions scenarios. A special report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. N. Nakicenovic, R. Swart (Eds.).
52. NBADW, 2011. New Brunswick aquatic data warehouse. Canadian Rivers Institute. Available from: http://www.unb.ca/research/institutes/cri/nbaquatic/index.html, Accessed October 2012.
53. Noble T.G., Bray D. Stream Hydrograph Analysis for Estimating Groundwater Recharge. Unpublished report 1995, UNB Department of Civil Engineering.
54. Rivard C., Vigneault H., Piggott A.R., Larocque M., Anctil F. Groundwater recharge trends in Canada. Can. J. Earth Sci. 2009, 46:841-854.
55. Rowell D.P. A demonstration of the uncertainty in projections of UK climate change resulting from regional model formulation. Clim. Change 2006, 79:243-257.
56. Scanlon B.R., Christman M., Reedy R.C., Porro I., Simunek J., Flerchinger G.N. Intercode comparisons for simulating water balance of surficial sediments in semiarid regions. Water Resour. Res. 2002, 38:WR001233.
57. Schroeder, P.R., Dozier, T.S., Zappi, P.A., McEnroe, B.M., Sjostrom, J.W., Peyton, R., 1994. The Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model. Engineering Documentation for Version 3. EPA/600/R-94/168b.
58. Scibek J., Allen D.M. Modeled impacts of predicted climate change on recharge and groundwater levels. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42:W11405.
59. Serrat-Capdevila A., Valdés J.B., Pérez J.G., Baird K., Mata L.J., Maddock T. Modeling climate change impacts - and uncertainty - on the hydrology of a riparian system: The San Pedro Basin (Arizona/Sonora). J. Hydrol. 2007, 347:48-66.
60. Solomon S., Qin D., Manning M., Chen Z., Marquis M., Averyt K., et al. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contributions of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
61. Taylor R.G., Scanlon B., Döll P., Rodell M., van Beek R., Wada Y., et al. Groundwater and climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 2012, Published online, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1744.
62. Teng J., Vaze J., Chiew F.H.S., Wang B., Perraud J. Estimating the relative uncertainties sourced from GCMs and hydrological models in modeling climate change impact on runoff. J. Hydrometeorol. 2012, 13:122-139.
63. Teutschbein C., Seibert J. Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: Review and evaluation of different methods. J. Hydrol. 2012, 456-457:12-29.
64. Thampi S.G., Raneesh K.Y. Impact of anticipated climate change on direct groundwater recharge in a humid tropical basin based on a simple conceptual model. Hydrol. Process. 2012, 26:1655-1671.
65. Toews, M.W., 2007. Modelling Climate Change Impacts on Groundwater Recharge in a Semi-arid Region, Southern Okanagan, British Columbia. PhD Thesis, Simon Fraser University.
66. Toews M.W., Allen D.M. Simulated response of groundwater to predicted recharge in a semi-arid region using a scenario of modelled climate change. Environ. Res. Lett. 2009, 4:035003.
67. Toews M.W., Allen D.M. Evaluating different GCMs for predicting spatial recharge in an irrigated arid region. J. Hydrol. 2009, 374:265-281.
68. United States Soil Conservation Service and Water Resources, 1985. National Engineering Handbook: Hydrology. Littleton, Colo., Water Resources Publications.
69. Waterloo Hydrogeologic I. Visual HELP User's Manual: Predicting Landfill Hydrology and Optimizing Landfill Designs 2002, ON, Waterloo Hydrogeologic Inc., Waterloo.
70. Wegehenkel M., Kersebaum K. An assessment of the impact of climate change on evapotranspiration, groundwater recharge, and low-flow conditions in a mesoscale catchment in northeast Germany. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2009, 172:737-744.
71. Wilby R., Hay L., Gutowski W., Arritt R., Takle E., Pan Z., et al. Hydrological responses to dynamically and statistically downscaled climate model output. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2000, 27:1199-1202.
72. Wilby R., Wigley T. Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 1997, 21:530-548.
73. Xu C. From GCMs to river flow: a review of downscaling methods and hydrologic modelling approaches. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 1999, 23:229-249.